Probing Semiconductor Technology and Devices with Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy

  • P. Eyben
  • W. Vandervorst
  • D. Alvarez
  • M. Xu
  • M. Fouchier

Abstract

As the downscaling in semiconductor industry continues, the correct operation of devices becomes critically dependent on the precise location and activation of the dopants in two dimensions. For Si technology, Duane had already determined in 1996 that, in the 0.25-μm CMOS technology, a 10-nm decrease in the channel length was responsible for a more than 10% increase in the gate-to-drain overlap capacitance [1]. In the 65-nm devices processed today, effects of shifts in lateral position of a few nanometers or of variations in concentration of a few percent in the channel are drastically more pronounced.

Keywords

Oxide Thickness Gate Length Spreading Resistance Concentration Sensitivity Gate Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Duane, P. Nunan, M. ter Beek, and R. Subrahmanyan, JVST B14, 218 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. G. Wilson, F. A. Stevie and C. W. Magee, Wiley, New York (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. G. Mazur and D. H. Dickey, J. Electrochem. Soc. 113, 255 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Vandervorst and T. Clarysse, JVST B10(1), 302 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Pawlik, JVST B10(1), 388 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Borden, L. Bechtler, K. Lingel and R. Nijmeijer in Handbook of Silicon Semiconductor Metrology, edited by A. C. Diebold, Dekker Inc., NY (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Vandervorst and M. Meuris, EP-466274, Jan. 15 (1992).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Vandervorst and M. Meuris, US-5369372, Nov. 29 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. De Wolf, J. Snauwaert, T. Clarysse, W. Vandervorst, and L. Hellemans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1530 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium (1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. N. Nxumalo, D. T. Shimizu, and D. J. Thomson, JVST B 14, 386 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Shafai, D. J. Thomson, M. Simard-Nomardin, G. Mattiussi, and P. J. Scanlon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 342 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Hantschel, S. Slesazeck, P. Niedermann, P. Eyben, W. Vandervorst, Microelec. Eng. 57–58, 749 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Fouchier, P. Eyben, D. Alvarez, N. Duhayon, M. Xu, J. Lisoni, S. Brongersma and W. Vandervorst, Proc. of SPIE 5116, 607 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Clarysse, P. De Wolf, H. Bender and W. Vandervorst, JVST B 14(1), 358 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. De Wolf, T. Clarysse and W. Vandervorst, JVST B 16(1), 320 (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Eyben, S. Denis, T. Clarysse and W. Vandervorst, Mat. Sci. & Eng. B, 102(1–3), 132 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Eyben, M. Xu, N. Duhayon, T. Clarysse, S. Callewaert and W. Vandervorst, JVST B 20(1), 471 (2002).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Eyben, N. Duhayon, D. Alvarez and W. Vandervorst, AIP Conf. Proc. 683, 678 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Eyben, D. Alvarez, T. Clarysse and W. Vandervorst, AIP Conf. Proc. 683, 685 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Yang and F. C. J. Kong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4973 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Eyben, M. Fouchier, P. Albart, J. Charon-Verstaffen and W. Vandervorst Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 717, C7.7 (2003).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Goghero, F. Giannozzo, V. Raineri, E-MRS Proc. 2002, (2002).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Hantschel, P. Niedermann, T. Trenkler, W. Vandervorst, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1603 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    See: http://www.nanosensors.com/diamondcoatedsensors.html Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Trenkler, T. Hantschel, R. Stephenson, P. De Wolf, W. Vandervorst, L. Hellimans, A. Malavi, D. Büchel, E. Oesters-chulze, W. Kulisch, P. Niedermann, T. Sulzbach and O. Ohlsson. JVST B 18, 418 (2000).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. Alvarez, J. Hartwich, M. Fouchier, P. Eyben and W. Vandervorst, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(11), 1724 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. Clarysse, M. Caymax, P. De Wolf, T. Trenkler, W. Vandervorst, J. S. McMurray, J. Kim, C. C. Williams, J. G. Clark and G. Neubauer, JVST B 16, 394 (1998).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Clarysse, P. Eyben, N. Duhayon, and W. Vandervorst, JVST B21(2), 729 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. S. Sheiko, M. Moeller, E. M. C. M. Reuvekamp and H. W. Zandbergen, Phys. Rev. B 48(8), 5675 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Holm, “Electrical Contacts Handbook”, Springer, Berlin, 17 (1958).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    See: http://ece-ww.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch37.htm Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. M. Sze, John Wiley & Sons (1981).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, S. Pinhas, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6207 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y. V. Sharvin, JETP (21), 655 (1965).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Brandbyge, J. Schiøtz, M. R. Sørensen, P. Stoltze, K.W. Jacobsen, J. K. Nørskov, L. Olesen, E. Laegsgaard, I. Stensgaard and F. Besenbacher, Phys. Rev. B52, 8499 (1995).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    See: http://www.ise.ch/products/dessis/ Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    S. Denis, Master’s Thesis, Université de Liège, 15 (2002).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. H. Pointdexter, G. J. Gerardi, M.-E. Rueckel, P. J. Caflan, N. M. Johnson and D. K. Biegelsen, JAP 56(10), 2844 (1984).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    E. R. Weppelmann, J. S. Field, and M. V. Swain, J. Mater. Res. 8, 830 (1993).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    G. M. Pharr, W. C. Oliver, R. F. Cook, P. D. Kirchner, M. C. Kroll, T. R. Dinger and D. R. Clarke. J. Mat. Res. 7, 961 (1992).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Z. Hu, L. D. Merkle, C. S. Menoni, and I. L. Spain, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4679 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. C. Gupta and A. L. Ruo, JAP 51, 1072 (1980).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 97–101 (1998).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 103–106 (1998).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 91 (1998).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. J. Marchand and Van Khiem Truong, JAP 54(12), 7034 (1983).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    See: http://www.marc.com/ Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    T. A. Laursen and J. C. Simo, Mat. Res. 7, 618 (1992).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    C. Raskon internal report, LETI (2003).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thurber W. R., Mattis R., Liu Y. M. and Filliben J. J, Semic. Meas. Techn., NBS Special Publi. 400-64 (1981).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    S.M. Hu, JAP 53, 1499 (1982).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    T. Clarysse, D. Vanhaeren, I. Hoflijk and W. Vandervorst. Mat. Sci. & Eng. Reports 47(5–6), 123 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    P. De Wolf, T. Clarysse and W. Vandervorst, JVST B 16, 335 (1998).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    P. A. Schumann and E. E. Gardner, Solid St. Electron. 12, 371 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. Meuris, W. Vandervorst, and P. De Wolf, US-5585734 (Dec. 17, 1996) and EP-466174 (Oct. 18, 1996) (1996).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    P. De Wolf, T. Clarysse, and W. Vandervorst, US-5995912 (Apr. 29, 1997), (1997).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 142 (1998).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    J. Yang and F. C. J. Kong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(26), 4973 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    P. De Wolf, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 133–134 (1998).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    N. Duhayon, T. Clarysse, D. Alvarez, P. Eyben, M. Fouchier, W. Vandervorst and L. Hellemans, Proc. ALTECH 2003, J.1, 743 (2003).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    O. Douheret, S. Bonsels and S. Amand, JVSTB 23(1), 61 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    H. Fukutome, T. Saiki, M. Hori, T. Tanaka, R. Nakamura and H. Arimoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43(4B) (2004).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    P. Eyben, H. Fukutome, D. Alvarez and W. Vandervorst, Proc. ESSDREC 2004, 101–104 (2004).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    S. C. Jain, W. Schoenmaker, R. Lindsay, P. A. Stolk, S. Decoutere, M. Willander and H. E. Maes, JAP 91(11), 8919 (2002).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    S. Severi, K. Henson, R. Lindsay and K. De Meyer, Proc. ULIS 2004, Leuven, 69 (2004).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    S. Severi, K. G. Anil, J. B. Pawlak, R. Duffy, K. Henson, R. Lindsay, A. Lauwers, A. Veloso, J.-F. deMarneffe, J. Ramos, B. Sijmus, K. Devriendt, R. A. Camillo-Castillo, P. Eyben, W. Vandervorst, M. Jurezak, S. Biesemansm and K. DeMeyer, Proc. IEDM 2004 (2004).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    W. Vandervorst, D. Alvarez, P. Eyben, M. Fouchier, J. Hartwich, S. Slesazeck, P. Verheyen and S. Hogg, Proc. ULIS 2004, 63 (2004).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    S. Kluth, D. Alvarez, St. Trellenkamp, J. Moers, S. Mantl, J. Kretz, W, Vandervorst, JVST B. 23(1), 76 (2005).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    M. W. Xu, T. Hantschel and W. Vandervorst, Proc. 2001 Int. Conf. on InP and Rel. Mat., Nara, Japan, 2001.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    C. Y. Chang and S. M. Sze. 13, 727 (1970).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    P. DeWolf, M. Geva, C. L. Reynolds, T. Hantschel, W. Vandervorst and R. B. Bylsma, JVST A. 17, 1285 (1999).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ching-Yuan Wu. JAP 51, 3786 (1980).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    P. Speier, K. Wunstel, and F. Tegude. Electron. Lett. 23(25), 1363 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    D. Bertone and G. Fornuto, Proc. 7th Intern. Conf. on InP and Rel. Mat., 279 (1995).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    T. Tanbun-ek, R. A. Logan, and J. P. van der Ziel. Electron. Lett. 24(24), 1483 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    T. Kallstenius, U. Smith, and B. Stoltz. Journal of the Electrochem. Soc., 146(2), 749 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    P. Harde, R. Gibis, R. Kaiser, H. Kizuki, and H. Kunzel, J. of Crystal Growth 201–202, 719 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Eyben
    • 1
  • W. Vandervorst
    • 1
  • D. Alvarez
    • 2
  • M. Xu
    • 1
  • M. Fouchier
    • 3
  1. 1.LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Infineon TechnologiesEssex JunctionUSA
  3. 3.Z. I. de la GaudréeVeeco instruments S.A.S.DourdanFrance

Personalised recommendations