Introduction The Multi-Layered Transitions of Knowledge Production and University Education in Science and Mathematics

  • Paola Valero
  • Ole Ravn Christensen
  • Ole Skovsmose

More than ever, our time is characterized by rapid changes in the organization and the production of knowledge. This movement is deeply rooted not only in the evolution of the scientific endeavour, but also and especially in the transformation of the political, economic and cultural organization of society. In other words, the production of scientific knowledge is changing both with regards to the internal development of science and technology, and with regards to the function and role science and technology fulfill in society.

Knowledge production has, for some time, stopped being the exclusivity of universities, founded as bastions and guardians of truth and knowledge. This production can now be owned by a variety of institutions and organizations with interests other than the production and maintenance of knowledge for its own sake. This general social context in which universities and knowledge production are placed has been given numerous names: the knowledge society, the informational society, the learning society, the post-industrial society, the risk society, or even the post-modern society (e.g., Castells, 1996, 1997, 1998; Beck, 1992, 1999; Lyotard, 1984).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
  3. Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume II, The Power of Identity. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (1998). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume III, End of Millennium. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (2003). Communication from the Commission: The role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved May 2008.ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/documents_r5/natdir0000038/s _1940005_20030317_144432_GERC031941en.pdf
  7. European Ministers of Education (1999). The Bologna Declaration on the European space for higher education. Brussels: European Ministers of Education. Retrieved May 2008. http://ec. europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf
  8. Knight, P.T. (2002). Being a Teacher in Higher Education. Buckingham: SHRE —Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Krogh, L. (in press). Nye udfordringer i undervisningen ved universiteterne-en professionel strategi for undervisningen, set i lyset af aktuelle samfundsmæssige krav [New challenges for Teaching at Universities—A Professional Strategy for Teaching in the Light od Current Social Demands]. In P. Rasmussen & A.A. Jensen (Eds.), Læring og forandring. Aalborg: Aalborg University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Poulos, A. & Mahony, J. (2008). Effectiveness of Feedback: The Students' Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Snow, C.P. (1969). The Two Cultures: And a Second Look. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Valero
    • 1
  • Ole Ravn Christensen
    • 2
  • Ole Skovsmose
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematics Education at the Department of Education, Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Education, Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations