Advertisement

Differentiated Pricing Policies in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

  • Shamik SenguptaEmail author
  • Mainak Chatterjee
Chapter

Keywords

Service Provider Nash Equilibrium Access Network User Satisfaction Heterogeneous Wireless Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CDMA Development Group, “CDMA2000 and WiFi: Making a business case for interoperability,” Sep. 2003, http://www.cdg.org.
  2. 2.
    J. Mitola and G.Q. Maguire Jr., “Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 13-18, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    GTRAN, “GTRAN dual-mode 802.11/CDMA wireless modem,” http://www.gtranwireless.com.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    P. J. Seok and K.S. Rye, “Developing MVNO market scenarios and strategies through a scenario planning approach,” in Proc. of 7th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT’05), vol. 1, pp. 137-142.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Cocchi, S. Shenker, D. Estrin, and L. Zhang, “Pricing in computer networks: Motivation, formulation, and example,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 1, no. 6, Dec. 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Parris, S. Keshav, and D. Ferrari, “A framework for the study of pricing in integrated networks,” Institute of Computer Science, Berkeley, California, TR-92-016, Mar. 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Odlyzko, “Paris Metro pricing: The minimalist differentiated services solution,” in Proc. of Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS), pp. 159-161, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. K. Mackie-Mason and H.R. Varian, “Economic FAQs about the Internet,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 3, pp.24-36, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. McMillan, “Selling spectrum rights,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 145-162, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Shakkottai and R. Srikant, “Economics of network pricing with multiple ISPs,” in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 1, pp. 184-194, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Mandjes, “Pricing strategies under heterogeneous service requirements,” inProc. of IEEE INFOCOM’03, vol. 2, pp. 1210-1220, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Keller, T. Lohmar, R. Tonjes, and J. Thielecke, “Convergence of cellular and broadcast networks from a multi-radio perspective,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51-56, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Shabany, K. Navaie, and E.S. Sousa, “Downlink resource allocation for data traffic in heterogeneous cellular CDMA networks,” in Proc. of Ninth International Symposium on Computers and Communications, vol. 1, pp. 436-441, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Zemlianov and G. de Veciana, “Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks with infrastructure support,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 23, no. 3, pp.657-667, March 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Zemlianov and G. de Veciana, “Cooperation and decision-making in a wireless multi-provider setting,” in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 1, pp. 386-397, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. K. Chau and K. M. Sim, “Analyzing the impact of selfish behaviors of Internet users and operators,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 463-465, Sept. 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Wang and B. Li, “Market-driven bandwidth allocation in selfish overlay networks,” in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 4, pp. 2578-2589, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Lin, M. Chatterjee, S. K. Das, and K. Basu, “ARC: An integrated admission and rate control framework for CDMA data networks based on non-cooperative games,” in Proc. of 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom 2003), San Diego, pp. 326-338, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. He and J. Walrand, “Pricing Internet services with multiple providers,” inProc. of Allerton Conference 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Musacchio and J. Walrand, “WiFi access point pricing as a dynamic game,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 289-301, April 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. C. M. Lee, J. W. J. Jiang, J. C. S. Lui, and C. D.-Ming, “Interplay of ISPs: Distributed resource allocation and revenue maximization,” in Proc. of 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    X. Wang and H. Schulzrinne, “Pricing network resources for adaptive applications,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 506-519, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. F. Nash, “Equilibrium points in N-person games,” Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 48-49, 1950.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    P. Bender, P. Black, M. Grob, R. Padovani, N. Sindhushyana, and S. Viterbi, “CDMA/HDR: A bandwidth efficient high speed wireless data service for nomadic users,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 38, issue 7, pp. 70-77, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    3GPP TR25.848 V0.5.0, “Physical Layer Aspects of UTRA High Speed Downlink Packet Access(HSDPA),” ANNEX B, TSGR1#18(01)186, Jan. 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. Bonald and A. Proutiere, “Wireless downlink data channels: User performance and cell dimensioning,” in Proc. of ACM MobiCom, pp. 339-352, 2003.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Faizullah and I. Marsic, “Charging for QoS in internetworks,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1957-1962, 2001.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Felegyhazi, M. Cagalj, and J.-P. Hubaux, “Multi-radio channel allocation in competitive wireless networks,” in Proc. of 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, July 2006.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Kikuchi, “(M+1)st-price auction protocol,” inProc. of the 5th International Conference on Financial Cryptography, pp. 351-363, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ETSI, “Requirements and architectures for intenvorking between HIPEKLANI3 and 3rd generation cellular systcms,” Tech. rep. ETSI TR 191 957, Aug.2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Stevens Institute of TechnologyHoboken
  2. 2.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of Central FloridaOrlando

Personalised recommendations