Advertisement

Understanding the Exchange Intention of an Individual Blogger

  • Wee-Kek Tan
  • Chuan-Hoo Tan
  • Hock-Hai Teo
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 267)

Abstract

This research explores the issue of how ablogring, a circle/community of blogs with a common theme (Xanga 2008; Chua and Xu 2007), could be utilized to form a loosely distributed exchange of products for monetary and nonmonetary returns. Specifically, we present a research model that identifies factors influencing a blogger’s intention to participate in a commercial exchange, a commercial activity involving a blogger and a reader within a blogring.

A blogring is conceptualized as a natural segmentation of user-alike whereby members (i.e., bloggers and readers) converge toward common interests reflected in the blog contents (Kumar et al. 2004; Gumbrecht 2004). The formation of this social network provides bloggers with the social capital to engage in collaboration and cooperation with other members (Putnam 2000; Peece 2002). Economizing on this social capital, bloggers could engage in product, service, and/or money exchanges. We term this process the economic leverage of personal blog (Balasubramanian and Mahajan 2001). Such an economic leverage includes selling, barter trading, and outright giving away items that can be identified or associated with the shared interests of the blogring. In other words, any exchange between bloggers and readers need not necessarily be for monetary returns but could also involve an exchange of knowledge or expertise in return for approval-related utility (Balasubramanian and Mahajan 2001). With this understanding, we next present our research model.

The research model (Figure 1) draws from three streams of literature. First, we reference the similarity attraction theory (Byrne 1971), which posits that people prefer to interact with like-minded others. For instance, salespeople generally prefer to sell to prospects sharing characteristics (e.g., gender and age) with themselves (Dwyer et al. 1998). Hence, we conjecture that bloggers could be more inclined to commercial exchange with readers who have similar interests. We term this blogger-reader similarity. Second, the general premise of the social network dictates that members could place higher priority on relationships and ties with other members within a blogring compared with individuals’ personality attributes. Hence, we could posit that the stronger the tie (Frenzen and Davis 1990; Marsden and Campbell 1984) between a buyer and a seller, the higher the likelihood for purchase (Frenzen and Davis). Additionally, the closer a reader is to the blogger, the greater the ease of engaging in an exchange due to greater influence exerted by the blogger over the reader (Burkhardt 1994).

Third, building on the decision-making framework proposed by Luce, Bettman, and Payne (2001), we hypothesize that the decision of whether to engage in an exchange depends on the appraisal of the exchange situation, which in turn is influenced by blogger-reader similarity and social network. A positive appraisal should lead to a higher exchange intention from the blogger. However, any negative peer pressure against commercialism exerted by other blogring members could negatively moderate the appraisal (Luce et al. 2001), thus leading to lower exchange intention.

Keywords

Social Capital Research Model Exchange Intention Commercial Exchange Money Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Balasubramanian, S., and Mahajan, V. 2001. “The Economic Leverage of the Virtual Community,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (5:3), Spring, pp. 103-138.Google Scholar
  2. Burkhardt, M. E. 1994. “Social Interaction Effects Following a Technological Change: A Longitudinal Investigation,” Academy of Management Journal (37:(4), August, pp. 869-898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne, D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chau, M., and Xu, J. 2007. “Mining Communities and Their Relationships in Blogs: A Study of Online Hate Groups,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (65:1), pp. 57-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dwyer, S., Richard, O., and Shepherd, C. D. 1998. “An Exploratory Study of Gender and Age Matching in the Salesperson-Prospective Customer Dyad: Testing Similarity-Performance Predictions,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management (18:4), Fall, pp. 55-69.Google Scholar
  6. Frenzen, J. K., and Davis, H. L. 1990. “Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets,” Journal of Consumer Research (17), June, pp. 1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gumbrecht, M. 2004. “Blogs as ‘Protected Space,’” presentation at the WWW 2004 Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis and Dynamics, New York May 18.Google Scholar
  8. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Raghavan, P., and Tomkins, A. 2004. “Structure and Evolution of Blogspace,” Communications of the ACM (47:12), December, pp. 35-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., and Payne, J. W. Emotional Decisions: Tradeoff Difficulty and Coping in Consumer Choice, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marsden, P. V., and Campbell, K. E. 1984. “Measuring Tie Strength,” Social Forces (63:2), December, pp. 482-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Preece, J. 2002. “Supporting Community and Building Social Capital,” Communications of the ACM (45:4), April, pp. 37-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Xanga. 2008. “Xanga Help Blogrings FAQ,” (http://www.xanga.com; accessed March 25, 2008).

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wee-Kek Tan
    • 1
  • Chuan-Hoo Tan
    • 2
  • Hock-Hai Teo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsCity University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations