Abstract

This paper rejects the hypothesis of Thomas Friedman that ICT-enabled globalization is driving us toward a flat world. Instead, it is argued that the world remains uneven, full of seams, culturally heterogeneous, locally specific, inequitable, not well-integrated and constantly changing. This argument is supported by an analysis of three areas of ICT-enabled global working, namely global software outsourcing, global IS roll-out, and global virtual teams. The paper then builds on these analyses to put forward an agenda for future IS research on ICTs and global working based on three research themes: identity and cross-cultural working; globalization, localization and standardization; and power, knowledge, and control. The paper concludes that the area of ICTs and global working offers the IS field a major research opportunity to make a significant contribution to our understanding of a set of crucial issues in our more globalized world.

Keywords

Flat world globalization global software outsourcing global IS roll-out global virtual teams IS research agenda identity cross-cultural working standardization power knowledge control 

References

  1. Adam, M., and Myers, M. 2003. “Have You Got Anything to Declare? Neo-Colonialism, Information Systems, and the Imposition of Customs and Duties in a Third World Country,” in Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, M. Korpela, R. Montealegre, and A. Poulymenakou (eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 101-116.Google Scholar
  2. Ailon-Souday, G., and Kunda, G. 2003. “The Local Selves of Global Workers: The Social Construction of National Identity in the Face of Organizational Globalization,” Organization Studies (24:7), pp. 1073-1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Avgerou, C. 2002. Information Systems and Global Diversity, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. 2000. What Is Globalization?, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., and Shaw, V. 2007. “Developing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries: The Flexible Standards Strategy,” MIS Quarterly (31:2), pp. 381-402.Google Scholar
  7. Brannen, M. Y., and Salk, J. E. 2000. “Partnering Across Borders: Negotiating Organizational Culture in a German-Japan Joint Venture,” Human Relations (53:4), pp. 451-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society (1st ed.), Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity (1st ed.), Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. 1998. End of Millennium (1st ed.), Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Crowston, K., Sieber, S., and Wynn, E. (eds.). 2007. Virtuality and Virtualization, Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Davenport, T. H. 1998 “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 121-131.Google Scholar
  13. D’Mello, M. 2005. “‘Thinking Local, Acting Global’: Issues of Identity and Related Tensions in Global Software Organizations in India,” Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (22:2), pp. 1-20.Google Scholar
  14. D’Mello, M. 2006. Understanding Selves and Identities of Information Technology Professionals: A Case Study from India, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  15. D’Mello, M., and Sahay, S. 2007. “‘I Am Kind of a Nomad Where I Have to Go Places and Places’ …Understanding Mobility, Place and Identity in Global Software Work from India,” Information and Organization (17:3), pp. 162-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dubé, L., and Paré, G. 2001. “Global Virtual Teams,” Communications of the ACM (44:12), pp. 71-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, T. 2005. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, C. B., and Gibbs, J. L. 2006. “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (51:3), pp. 451-495.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  21. Jagun, A., Heeks, R., and Whalley, J. 2007. “Mobile Telephony and Developing Country MicroEnterprise: A Nigerian Case Study,” Working Paper No 29, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  22. Joshi, S., Barrett, M, Walsham, G., and Cappleman, S. 2007. “Balancing Local Knowledge Within Global Organizations Through Computer-Based Systems: An Activity Theory Approach,” Journal of Global Information Management (15:3), pp. 1-19.Google Scholar
  23. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K-K. 2007. “Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems (23:3), pp. 237-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kayworth, T. R., and Leidner, D. E. 2002. “Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:3), pp. 7-40.Google Scholar
  25. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A., and Willmott, H. 2007. “A Dark Side of Institutional Entrepreneurship: Soccer Balls, Child Labour and Postcolonial Impoverishment,” Organization Studies (28:7), pp. 1055-1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krishna, S., Sahay, S., and Walsham, G. 2004. “Managing Cross-Cultural Issues in Global Software Outsourcing,” Communications of the ACM (47:4), pp. 62-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishna, S., and Walsham, G. 2005. “Implementing Public Information Systems in Developing Countries: Learning from a Success Story,” Information Technology for Development (11:2), pp. 123-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leamer, E. E. 2007. “A Flat World, a Level Playing Field, a Small World after All, or None of the Above? A Review of Thomas L. Friedman’s The World is Flat,” Journal of Economic Literature (XLV), pp. 83-126.Google Scholar
  29. Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., Stamps, J., and Lipnack, J. 2004. “Can Absence Make a Team Grow Stronger?,” Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 131-137.Google Scholar
  30. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., and Maynard, M. T. 2004. “Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here?,” Journal of Management (30:6), pp. 805-835.Google Scholar
  31. McAfee, A. P. 2006. “Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration,” MIT Sloan Management Review (47:3), pp. 21-28.Google Scholar
  32. Miscione, G. 2007. “Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: Interplay with Local Health Care Practices,” MIS Quarterly (31:2), pp. 403-425.Google Scholar
  33. Nicholson, B., and Sahay, S. 2001. “Some Political and Cultural Issues in the Globalization of Software Development: Case Experience from Britain and India,” Information and Organization (11:1), pp. 25-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orlikowski, W. J., and Barley, S. R. 2001. “Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?,” MIS Quarterly (25:2), pp. 145-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmisano, S. 2006. “Multinationals Have Been Superseded,” Financial Times, June 12, p. 19.Google Scholar
  36. Pan, S. L., and Leidner, D. E. 2003. “Bridging Communities of Practice with Information Technology in Pursuit of Global Knowledge Sharing,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (12:1), pp. 71-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollock, N., Williams, R., and Procter, R. 2003. “Fitting Standard Software Packages to NonStandard Organizations: The Biography of an Enterprise-Wide System,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management (15:3), pp. 317-332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pollock, N., Williams, R., and D’Adderio, L. 2007. “Global Software and its Provenance: Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages,” Social Studies of Science (37:2), pp. 254-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qureshi, S., and Zigurs, I. 2001. “Paradoxes and Prerogatives in Global Virtual Collaboration,” Communications of the ACM (44:12), pp. 85-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rolland, H. H., and Monteiro, E. 2002. “Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems,” The Information Society (18:2), pp. 87-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sahay, S., Nicholson, B., and Krishna, S. 2003. Global IT Outsourcing: Software Development Across Borders, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tan, B. C. Y. 2007. “Leveraging Virtual Communities for Global Competitiveness,” Journal of Global Information Management (15:3), pp. i-iii.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson, M. 2004. “Discourse, ‘Development’ and the ‘Digital Divide’: ICT and the World Bank,” Review of African Political Economy (31:9), pp. 103-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson, M. 2007. “ICT and Development Studies: Towards Development 2.0,” Working Paper 27/2007, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge (http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2007/wp0727.pdf).
  45. Urry, J. 2000. “Mobile Sociology,” British Journal of Sociology (51:1), pp. 185-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walsham, G. 2001. Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context, Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Walsham, G. 2002. “Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (26:4), pp. 359-380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoff Walsham
    • 1
  1. 1.Judge Business SchoolUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations