Bandwithing Together: Municipalities as Service Providers in a Policy Environment

  • Andrea H. Tapia
  • Julio Angel Ortiz
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 267)


In this paper we have highlighted three things. First, that public organizations are engaged in a technologically driven servitization of their traditional service products. Second, that public organizations must approach this servitization differently because of the decision-making role of citizens in the process. Third, it is essential to study the influence citizens have on this process through studying the public policy process around decisions concerning the delivery of technology and technologically driven services. In this paper we provide an overview of four constituencies and their relationships involved in municipal wireless broadband policy. The idea that the growth of information technology-dependent services and activities (education, healthcare, and Web 2.0, for instance) are dependent on wide-scale availability of broadband access, and that local governments are jumping into this market to establish the necessary infrastructures for such services, makes this a very hotly contested space. While national and international political issues are debated on the Internet daily, new avenues for very local, political speech and action on the Internet seem to go hand-in-hand with municipal wireless broadband issues. The creation of public policy, while normally seen as a top-down process, has always drawn varying input from the outside through avenues such as lobbying, town meetings, referendums, and public action. We claim that in the case of municipal wireless broadband policy, policy efforts have been turned upside-down, with the majority of policy making now happens at the local level.


Municipal wireless servitization public policy broadband access 


  1. Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects,” in Shaping Technology/Building Society, W. E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205-224.Google Scholar
  2. Akrich, M., and Latour, B. 1992. “A Summary of Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies,” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, W.E.Bijker and J.Law (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 259-264.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bleha, T. 2005. “Down to the Wire,” Foreign Affairs, May/June, pp. 111-125.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, S. 1989. Public Policy in Canada: An Introduction, Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
  6. Buncombe, A. 2006. “FCC Investigates Fake News,” The Independent UK - Online Edition, May 31 (
  7. Callon, M. 1992. “The Dynamics of Techno-Economic Networks,” In Technology Change and Company Strategies: Economic and Sociological Perspectives, R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, and V. Walsh (eds.), London: Academic Press, pp. 72-102.Google Scholar
  8. Chrispeels, J. H. 1997. “Educational Policy Implementation in a Shifting Political Climate: The California Experience,” American Educational Research Journal (34:3), pp. 453-481.Google Scholar
  9. Christman, J. B., and Rhodes, A. 2002. Civic Engagement and Urban Improvement: Hard to Learn Lessons from Philadelphia, Philadelphia: Research for Action.Google Scholar
  10. Chung, J. 2001. “Vertical Support, Horizontal Linkages, and Regional Disparities in China Typology, Incentive,” Issues and Studies (37), pp. 121-148.Google Scholar
  11. Clay, E. J., and Schaffer, B. B. 1986. Room for Manoeuvre: An Explanation of Public Policy in Agriculture and Rural Development, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Considine, M. 1994. Public Policy: A Critical Approach, Melbourne, Australia: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, C., McMaster, J., and Nowak, J. 2002. “IT-Enabled Services as Development Drivers in Low- Income Countries: The Case of Fiji,” The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries (9:4), pp. 1-18.Google Scholar
  14. Demsetz, J. 1999. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry and Public Policy,” Journal of Law and Economics (16), pp. 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunn, W. N. (ed.). 1994. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Dunsire, A. 1978. Implementation in a Bureaucracy, Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  17. Dye, T. R. 1972. Understanding Public Policy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, F. 1995. Evaluating Public Policy, Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Frederich, C. J. 1963. Man and His Government, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Gerston, L. N. 1997. Public Policy Making: Process and Principles, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  21. Gillett, S. E., and Lehr, W. H. 1999. “Availability of Broadband Internet Access: Empirical Evidence,” paper presented at the 27th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, VA, September 25-27, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. Gillett, S. E., Lehr, W. H., and Osorio, C. 2004. “Local Government Broadband Initiatives,” Telecommunications Policy (28), pp. 537-558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillmor, D. 2004. We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People, New York: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A. O. M., Lester, J., and O’Toole, L. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice, New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  25. Grindle, M., and Thomas, J. 1990. “After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries,” World Development (18:8), pp. 1163-1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groosman, L., and Hamilton, A. 2004. “Meet Joe Blog,” Time, June 24 (
  27. Guiraudon, V. 2000. “European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Making as Venue Shopping,” Journal of Common Market Studies (38), pp. 249-269.Google Scholar
  28. Kubler, D., Schenkel, W., and Leresche, J. P. 2003. “Bright Lights, Big Cities? Metropolisation, Intergovernmental Relations and the New Federal Urban Policy in Switzerland,” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (9:1), pp. 261-282.Google Scholar
  29. Lafferty, W. M., and Hovden, E. 2003. “Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework,” Environmental Politics (12:3), pp. 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (ed.). 1992. Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Arti-facts. Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lehr, W., and McKnight, L. 2003. “Wireless Internet Access: 3G vs.WiFi?,” Telecommuni-cations Policy (27:5/6), pp. 351-370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehr, W., Osorio, C., Gillet, S., and Sirbu, M. 2005. “Measuring Broadband’s Economic Impact,” paper presented at the 33rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), Arlington, VA, September 23-25; revised October 4 (
  33. Lehr, W., Sirbu, M., and Gillet, S. 2004. “Municipal Wireless Broadband: Policy and Business Implications of Emerging Access Technologies,” unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (
  34. Lenard, T. M. 2004. “Government Entry into the Telecom Business: Are the Benefits Commensurate With the Costs?,” Progress on Point, February (
  35. Lewis, D. A. 1997. “The Two Rhetorical Presidencies: An Analysis of Televised Presidential Speeches 1947-1991,” American Politics Quarterly (25:3), pp. 380-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Morris, H. J. 2001. “Blogging Burgeons as a Form of Web Expression,” US News & World Report (130), p. 52.Google Scholar
  39. Nielsen/NetRatings. 2004. “Three Out of Four Americans Have Access to the Internet,” March 18 (
  40. Ortiz, J.,and Tapia, A. 2008. “Deploying for Deliverance: The Digital Divide Discourse in Municipal Wireless Networks,” Sociological Focus (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  41. Patton, C. V., and Sawicki, D. S. (eds.). 1993. Basic Methods of Public Policy Analysis and Planning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Pew Internet. 2006. “Home Broadband Adoption 2006,” May 28 (
  43. Pross, A. P. 1986. Group Politics and Public Policy, Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ragsdale, L. 1984. “The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking.” American Political Science Review (78), pp. 971-984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). 1999. Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schlager, E., and Blomquist, W. 1996. “A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process,” Political Research Quarterly (49), pp. 651-672.Google Scholar
  47. Stokey, E., and Zeckhauser, R. 1978. “Thinking about Policy Choices and Putting Analysis to Work,” Chapter 1 in A Primer for Policy Analysis, New York: W. W. Norton and Company, pp. 320-329.Google Scholar
  48. Stone, D. A. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Sundquist, J. L., and Davis, D. W. 1969. Making Federalism Work, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  50. Sutton, R. 1999. “The Policy Process: An Overview,” ODI Working Paper No. 118, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  51. Tapia, A., Stone, M., and Maitland, C. 2005. “Public-Private Partnerships and the Role of State and Federal Legislation in Wireless Municipal Networks,” paper presented at the 33rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Washington, DC, September 23-25.Google Scholar
  52. Tapia, A., Maitland, C., and Stone, M. 2006. “Making IT Work for Municipalities: Building Municipal Wireless Networks,” Government Information Quarterly (23:3/4), pp. 359-380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2002. “Understanding Broadband Demand: A Review of Critical Issues,” Office of Technology Policy, September 23 (
  54. Williams, J., and Griffin, T. 1996. “Evolution of Vertical Policy: US Steel’s Century of Commitment to the Mesabi,” Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change (5:1), pp. 147-173.Google Scholar
  55. Vandermerwe, S., and Rada, J. 1988. “Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services,” European Management Journal (6:4), pp. 315-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea H. Tapia
    • 1
  • Julio Angel Ortiz
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Sciences & TechnologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations