Skip to main content

Basic Steps for the Development of Decision Support Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites

Abstract

There is a growing desire to develop effective and efficient computational methods and tools that facilitate environmental analysis, evaluation and problem solving. Environmental problems of interest may include concerns as apparently dissimilar as revitalization of contaminated land, and effective management of inland and coastal waters. The approach to effective problem solving in both of these examples can involve the development of what are commonly called Decision Support Systems (DSSs).

Standard DSSs might be characterized as computational systems that provide access to a wealth of information pertaining to a specific problem. The types of information that might be available include information content, maps, and data. This information can be contained in databases and geographic information systems (GIS). Access is often provided through interfaces to queries that ease the task of sifting through the often large amounts of information available. These DSSs facilitate some numerical analysis (e.g., overlays of data on GIS images, rudimentary statistical analysis of data), but usually only indirectly affect evaluation and problem solving. Currently, DSSs of this form are the most common. However, an option exists to incorporate evaluation and problem solving directly into a DSS by using statistical decision tools such as sensitivity analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis. These systems may be thought of as decision analysis (MCDA) support systems.

Development of a DSS requires consideration of both the problem to be solved and the computational tools that are appropriate or needed. In terms of the problem, important components include: definition of objectives; links to the legislative or regulatory context; model structuring including identification of, and relationships between, parameters; cost factors; and value judgments. These should encompass environmental, economic and socio-political concerns. This is the standard approach to performing decision analysis using MCDA tailored specifically to environmental problem solving. A further consideration is how to gather and present case studies, once the DSS is developed. Computational issues that are faced include: database management (e.g., information, data, GIS); analysis tools (statistics, fate and transport modeling, risk assessment, MCDA); visualization of the problem; presentation of results; document production; feedback mechanisms; help; and advice. The user interface to each of these components, the navigation through these components, and degree of openness of each component of the DSS must also be considered. Openness, including communication and stakeholder involvement, is very important for maintaining transparency and defensibility in all aspects of the DSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wikipedia provides a web page on Decision Support Systems, with many related references and examples of DSSs.

References

  • Berger J (1985) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernado JM, Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian Theory. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Chichester, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berry D (1996) Statistics: A Bayesian Perspective. Duxbury Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Black PK (1996a) An Examination of Belief Functions and Other Monotone Capacities, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  • Black PK (1996b) Geometric Structures of Lower Probability, in Applications and Theory of Random Sets, August 22–24. Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications (IMA), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ (1999) Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • CRWMS M&O (Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System, Management and Operating Contractor) (1996) Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Analysis for Yucca Mountain, Nevada, BA0000000-1717-2200-00082, Rev. 0, June 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giarratano JC, Riley G (2005) Expert Systems Principles and Programming. PWS Publishing Company, Boston MA

    Google Scholar 

  • GoldSim Technology Group (accessed 2008) GoldSim. <http://www.goldsim.com>

  • Goodman IR (1994) A new characterization of fuzzy logic operators producing homomorphic-like relations with one-point coverages of random sets. In: Wang P (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Theory and Technology Vol. 2. Duke University, Durham NC, pp. 133–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckerman D (1986) Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN’s certainty factors. In: Kanal LN, Lemmer JF (eds) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 167–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrion M (2006) Open-Source Policy Modeling. Lumina Decision Systems, Inc. <http://www.lumina.com/>

  • Howard RA, Matheson JE (1981) Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds) (1984) Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis Vol. 2. Menlo Park, CA, pp. 719–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker G, Bridges T, Varghese AS, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental management. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1(2):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumina Decision Systems, Inc. (accessed 2008) Analytica. < http://www.lumina.com/ >

  • Modelkey Partnership (accessed 2008) Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key Pollutants on Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity. <http://www.modelkey.ufz.de/>

  • Molchanov I (2005) The Theory of Random Sets (Probability and its Applications). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Source Geospatial Foundation (accessed 2008) Geographic Resources Analysis Support System. <http://grass.itc.it/>

  • Open Source Initiative (accessed 2008) Open Source Initiative. <http://www.opensource.org>

  • Papamarcou A, Fine TL (1986) A Note on undominated lower probabilities. Annals of Probability 14(2):710–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PostgreSQL Global Development Group (accessed 2008) PostgreSQL. <http://www.postgresql.org>

  • Refractions Research (accessed 2008) PostGIS. <http://postgis.refractions.net>

  • Regents of the University of Minnesota (accessed 2008) MapServer. <http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu>

  • Ripley, BD (1996) Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers M, Bruen M (1998) A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III. European Journal of Operational Research 107:552–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfeld T (1992) Fisher's fiducial argument and Bayes' Theorem. Statistical Science 7:358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • The Apache Software Foundation (accessed 2008) Cocoon. <http://cocoon.apache.org>

  • The Mozilla Organization (accessed 2008) Bugzilla. <http://www.bugzilla.org>

  • The R Foundation for Statistical Computing (accessed 2008) The R Project for Statistical Computing. <http://www.r-project.org>

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Causal Analysis/Diagnosis Decision Information System. <http://cfpub.epa.gov/caddis/>

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (accessed 2008) Sustainable Management Approaches and Revitalization Tools – electronic (SMARTe). <http://www.smarte.org>

  • Von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley P (1991) Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • WebMD LLC (accessed 2008) WebMD. <http://webmd.com>

  • World Wide Web Consortium (accessed 2008) World Wide Web Consortium. <http://www.w3c.org>

  • Zadeh LA (1983) The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11:199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The value of reviews by Dr. Paul Bardos (The University of Reading) and Dr. Neil Stiber (EPA)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Black, P., Stockton, T. (2009). Basic Steps for the Development of Decision Support Systems. In: Marcomini, A., Suter II, G., Critto, A. (eds) Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics