Advertisement

Methodology development of human task simulation as PLM solution related to OCRA ergonomic analysis

  • M. Annarumma
  • M. Pappalardo
  • A. Naddeo
Part of the The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 277)

In the current demanding global marketplace, ensuring that human fit, form and function are comprehensively addressed, is becoming an increasingly important aspect of design and, in particular, obliges the most important automotive industries to develop more flexible assembly lines and better methods for PLM solution. In the meantime, designers attempt to elaborate product development methodologies that conform health and safety standards while still maximizing the productivity. The aim of this work consists in developing a methodology based on preventive ergonomics and feasibility analyses of assembly tasks, simulating a work cell, in which acts a digital human model (manikin), in order to maximize human safety and performance and analyze manikin interaction in the virtual environment. In ergonomic analyses the OCRA protocol will be used, evaluating different involvement degrees of upper limb segments. The methodology is carried out by ergonomic tool of DELMIA software, using Digital Human Models technology.

Keywords

PLM solution ergonomic analysis OCRA protocol Digital Human Models 

References

  1. 1.
    Laring J., Christmansson M., Dukic T. et al.: Simulation for Manufacturing Engineering (ViPP), Digital Human Modelling for Design and Engineering Symposium, Iowa City (Iowa), 14-16 June (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller D. M., Park Y.: Simulation and Analysis of an Automotive Assembly Operation, Southern Automotive Manfacturing Conference & Exposition, Nashville (Tennessee), 11-13 August (1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DELMIA WORLD NEWS, Managing Change Across Virtual Design and Manufacturing, Delmia World News, n. 14 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Pardo M., Riccio A., Sessa F.: Intelligent Design of Ergonomic Workplace, CRF, ELASIS, Proceedings of IPMM, in The 6th International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials, Salerno, 25-29 June (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Temple R., Adams T.: Ergonomic Analysis of a Multi-Task Industrial Lifting Station Using the NIOSH Method. Journal of Industrial Technology, vol. 16(2), (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu E. Y., Oriet L. P.: Proactive Ergonomic Verification Through Human Biodynamic Modeling and Digital Simulation, Southern Automotive Manufacturing Conference and Exposition Birmingham, Alabama, 28-30 September (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Albers K. M., Abshire K. J.: Virtual Human Modeling for Manufacturing and Maintenance, in Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Conference and Exposition, Dayton (Ohio), 28-29 April (1998).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geyer M., Rösch B.: Human Modeling and e-Manufacturing, Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Conference and Exposition, Arlington, Virginia, 26-28 June, (also SAE Paper n. 2001-01-2119) (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stephens A., Godin C.: The Truck that Jack Built: Digital Human Models and Their Role in the Design of Work Cells and Product Design, in Digital Human Modelling for Design and Engineering Conference, Lyon (France), 4-6 July (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Annarumma
    • 1
  • M. Pappalardo
    • 1
  • A. Naddeo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalernoItaly

Personalised recommendations