Themes in Human Work Interaction Design

  • Rikke Orngreen
  • Annelise Mark Pejtersen
  • Torkil Clemmensen
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 272)

Abstract

This paper raises themes that are seen as some of the challenges facing the emerging practice and research field of Human Work Interaction Design. The paper has its offset in the discussions and writings that have been dominant within the IFIP Working Group on Human Work Interaction Design (name HWID) through the last two and half years since the commencement of this Working Group. The paper thus provides an introduction to the theory and empirical evidence that lie behind the combination of empirical work studies and interaction design. It also recommends key topics for future research in Human Work Interaction Design.

Keywords

work analysis interaction design HCI tools new ways of working 

References

  1. Anacleto Coutinho, Ferreira, Pereira (2007) “Promoting Culture Sensitive Education through a Common Sense Based Game” in Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (Eds.) (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human-Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  2. Bondarenko & Janssen (2005). “Affinity diagram method: Bringing users’ context into the system design”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.34-37.Google Scholar
  3. Campos & Nunes (2005). “A human-work interaction design approach by modeling the user’s work styles”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.44-47.Google Scholar
  4. Campos & Nunes (2006): “Principles and Practice of Work Style Modeling: Sketching Design Tools”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, Rikke Orngreen, Annelise Mark 44 Pejtersen, Torkil Clemmensen W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 203-220Google Scholar
  5. Clemmensen (2006): “A simple design for a complex work domain”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 221-240Google Scholar
  6. Clemmensen (2007) “The Cultural Usability (CULTUSAB)” in Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (Eds.) (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human-Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007 conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  7. Craft & Cairns (2006): “Using Sketching to Aid the Collaborative Design of Information Visualisation Software”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 103-122Google Scholar
  8. Duignan, Noble & Biddle (2006): “Activity Theory for Design: From Checklist to Interview”, Clemmensen, Campos, ørngreen, Pejtersen, & Wong (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, N. Y.. p. 1-26Google Scholar
  9. Erlandsson & Jansson (2007) “Collegial verbalisation – a case study on a new method on information acquisition” in Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (Eds.) (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human- Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  10. España, Pederiva, Ignacio Panach, Abrahão & Pastor (2006): “Linking requirements specification with interaction design and implementation”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.:Springer, New York. p. 123-134Google Scholar
  11. Gaspar, Ventura, Pereira & Santos (2006): “Continuous fitness at home: Designing exercise equipment for the daily routine” Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.:Springer, New York. p. 147-160Google Scholar
  12. Ham, Wong & Amaldi (2005). “Comparison of three methods for analyzing human work in terms of design approaches”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p7-11.Google Scholar
  13. Jansson, Olsson & Erlandsson (2007): “Bridging the gap between analysis and design: Improving existing driver interfaces with tools from the framework of cognitive work analysis” in Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (Eds.) (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human-Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  14. Johansson & Sandblad (2006): “VIHO - Efficient IT Support in Home Care Services”, Clemmensen, Campos, ørngreen, Pejtersen, & Wong, (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York.p. 47-66Google Scholar
  15. Kimani, Gabrielli & Catarci (2005).“Designing for primary tasks in mobile computing”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human- Work Interaction, at the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.11-17.Google Scholar
  16. Lewandowski & Bourguin (2006): “Improving collaboration support in software development activities” in Campos, Clemmensen, Orngreen, Wong, Mark-Pejtersen (2006) the Pre-conference proceedings of HWID’06.p. 33-45Google Scholar
  17. Lopes (2006): “Design as Dialogue – a New Design Framework”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 241-250Google Scholar
  18. Mark-Pejtersen & Fidel (2005). ”A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Describing Digital Library Users in Context”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.18-26.Google Scholar
  19. Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human-Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  20. McMorrow, Amaldi & Boiardi (2005). “Approaches to designing for highly collaborative, distributed and safety-critical environments”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.38-43.Google Scholar
  21. Nielsen, Yssing, Clemmensen, Orngreen, Nielsen, Levinsen (2006):” The human being in the 21st century– Design perspectives on the representation of users in IS” Clemmensen, Campos, ørngreen, Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 93-102Google Scholar
  22. Nocera, Dunckley & Hall (2005). “Reconfiguring producers and users through human-work interaction”, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, at the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.27-33.Google Scholar
  23. O’Hargan & Guerlain (2006): Design of a Ressource Allocation Planning System” Clemmensen, Campos, ørngreen, Pejtersen, & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York.p. 67-92Google Scholar
  24. Orngreen (2006): “The Design Sketching Process”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.:Springer, New York. p. 185-202Google Scholar
  25. Orngreen, Clemmensen, Nielsen, Christiansen, Levinsen, Nielsen & Yssing (2005) “The Human Being in the 21st Century –Design perspectives on the representation of users in IS development, Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Contex – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, at the INTERACT 205, Rome, Italy, p.54-59.Google Scholar
  26. Pereira, Malca, Gaspar & Ventura (2006): “Human Motion Analysis in Treadle Pump Devices”, Clemmensen, Campos, ørngreen., Pejtersen, & Wong (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York.p. 135-146Google Scholar
  27. Rasmussen (2007), “Internet Use in Eastern Europe A Case Study” in Mark-Pejtersen, Clemmensen et al (Eds.) (2007): Proceedings of the workshop: Social, Organisational and Cultural aspects of Human-Work Interaction Design, at the INTERACT 2007 conference, Rio, Brazil.Google Scholar
  28. Rasmussen, Jens, Pejtersen,A.M. and Goodstein, L.P. (1994): Cognitive Systems Engineering. JohnWiley, London.Google Scholar
  29. Rozzi & Wong (2006)” Design Sketching for Space and Time”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 161-184Google Scholar
  30. Stanard & Wampler (2005). “Work-centered user interface patterns” Proceedings of the workshop: Describing Users in Context – Perspectives on Human-Work Interaction, at the INTERACT 2005, Rome, Italy, p.48-53.Google Scholar
  31. Upton & Doherty: “Visual Representation of Complex Information Structures in High Volume manufacturing”, Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., ørngreen, R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Wong, W. (Eds.). (2006). Human work interaction design - designing for human work.: Springer, New York. p. 27-46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rikke Orngreen
    • 1
  • Annelise Mark Pejtersen
    • 2
  • Torkil Clemmensen
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Applied ICT, CBSDenmark
  2. 2.Chair of IFIP TC 13Denmark
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsCBSDenmark

Personalised recommendations