# Pushing Probability and Statistics Tasks in a New Direction

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Teacher Education book series (MTEN, volume 4)

Along with the increased emphasis on probability and statistics in the school curricula of countries across the world has come increased research on how primary and secondary students reason about these topics. Slower to emerge has been research aimed at what preservice teachers know about probability and statistics, and how best to develop their conceptions of key aspects of these content strands. Specifically, while attention is often paid to notions of randomness, graph sense, and the meaning of an average, less attention is paid to developing the critical notion of variation, or variability in data and chance. Therefore, the activities and tasks profiled in this chapter, while embracing several contexts in the realm of probability and statistics, are based on recommendations from emerging research suggesting that a focus be put on variability.

## Keywords

Preservice Teacher Prospective Teacher Statistics Task Initial Arrangement Elementary Preservice Teacher
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## References

1. Batanero, C., Godino, J., Valecillos, A., Green, D., & Holmes, P. (1994). Errors and difficulties in understanding elementary statistical concepts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 25(4), 527–547.
2. Canada, D. (2004). Elementary preservice teachers' understanding of variation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Portland State University, Portland, OR. (Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/?iase/publications/dissertations/dissertations.php)
3. Canada, D. (2006). Variability in a probability context: Developing preservice teachers' understanding. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
4. Canada, D., & Makar, K. (2006). Preservice teachers' informal descriptions of variation. Paper delivered at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
5. Cobb, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematics Monthly, 104(9), 801–824.
6. Makar, K., & Canada, D. (2005). Preservice teachers' conceptions of variation. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
7. Shaughnessy, J. (1997). Missed opportunities in research on the teaching and learning of data and chance. In F. Bidduch & K. Carr (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 6–22). Rotorua, NZ: MERGA.Google Scholar
8. Shaughnessy, M., & Arcidiacono, M. (1993). Visual encounters with chance (Unit VIII, Math and the Mind's Eye). Salem, OR: The Math Learning Centre.Google Scholar
9. Shaughnessy, J. M., Ciancetta, M., & Canada, D. (2004). Types of student reasoning on sampling tasks. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
10. Shaughnessy, J., Garfield, J., & Greer, B. (1996). Data handling. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Part 1) (pp. 205–237). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
11. Torok, R., & Watson, J. (2000). Development of the concept of statistical variation: An exploratory study. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 12(2), 147–169.Google Scholar
12. Watson, J., Kelly, B., Callingham, R., & Shaughnessy, J. (2003). The measurement of school students' understanding of statistical variation. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 1–29.
13. Watson, J., & Moritz, J. (2000). Developing concepts of sampling.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 44–70.
14. Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67, 233–265.Google Scholar