Biologically Inspired Approaches to Network Systems

Invited Contribution
  • T. Suda
  • T. Nakano
  • M. Moore
  • K. Fujii
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

This chapter describes two branches of biologically inspired approaches to networks: biologically inspired computer networks (i.e., the bio-networking architecture) and biologically inspired nanoscale biological networks (i.e., molecular communication). The first branch, biologically inspired computer networks, applies techniques and algorithms from biological systems to the design and development of computer networks. The second branch, biologically inspired nanoscale biological networks, applies techniques and algorithms from biological systems to the design and engineering of nanoscale biological networks.

Keywords

Virtual Machine Intercellular Communication Molecular Motor Network Application Carrier Molecule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Aickelin, U., J. Greensmith, and J. Twycross, “Immune System Approaches to Intrusion Detection – A Review”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, LNCS 3239, 316–329, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Alberts, B., A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th Bk8Cdr edition, Garland Science, London, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Di Caro, G., and M. Dorigo, “AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 9, 317–365, 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Dorigo, M., G. Di Caro, and L. M. Gambardella, “Ant Algorithms for Discrete Optimization”, Artificial Life, 5(3), 137–172, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Elowitz, M. B., and S. Leibler, “A Synthetic Oscillatory Network of Transcriptional Regulators”, Nature, 403, 335–338, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Enomoto, A., M. Moore, T. Nakano, R. Egashira, T. Suda, A. Kayasuga, H. Kojima, H. Sakibara, and K. Oiwa, “A Molecular Communication System Using a Network of Cytoskeletal Filaments Communication”, 2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference, May 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Forrest, S., S. Hofmeyr, and A. Somayaji, “Computer Immunology”, Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 88–96, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Freitas Jr, R. A., Nanomedicine, Vol. I: Basic Capabilities, Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX 1999.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    George, S., D. Evans, and S. Marchette, “A Biological Programming Model for Self-Healing”, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Workshop on Survivable and Self-Regenerative Systems, 72–81, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hariri, S., B. Khargharia, H. Chen, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, M. Parashar, and H. Liu, “The Autonomic Computing Paradigm”, Cluster Computing: The Journal of Networks, Software Tools, and Applications, 9(1), 5–17, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Head, T., M. Yamamura, and S. Gal, “Aqueous Computing – Writing on Molecules”, Proceedings of CEC’99, 1006–1010, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hiyama, S., Y. Isogawa, T. Suda, Y. Moritani, and K. Suto, “A Design of an Autonomous Molecule Loading/Transporting/Unloading System Using DNA Hybridization and Biomolecular Linear Motors in Molecular Communication”, European Nano Systems, December 2005.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hiyama, S., Y. Moritani, T. Suda, R. Egashira, A. Enomoto, M. Moore, and T. Nakano, “Molecular Communication”, Proceedings of the 2005 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hofmeyr, S. A., and S. Forrest, “Architecture for an Artificial Immune System”, Evolutionary Computation, 8(4), 443–473, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Itao, T., S. Tanaka, T. Suda, and T. Aoyama, “A Framework for Adaptive UbiComp Applications Based on the Jack-in-the-Net Architecture”, Kluwer/ACM Wireless Network Journal, 10(3), 287–299, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kephart, J. O., “A Biologically Inspired Immune System for Computers”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, 130–139, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kephart, J. O., and D. M. Chess, “The Vision of Autonomic Computing”, IEEE Computer, 36(1), 41–50, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mao, C., T. H. Labean, J. H. Reif, and N. C. Seeman, “Logical Computation Using Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA Triple-Crossover Molecules”, Nature, 407, 493–496, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Montresor, A., “Anthill: a Framework for the Design and Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Systems”, Proceedings of the 4th European Research Seminar on Advances in Distributed Systems, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Moore., M., A. Enomoto, T. Nakano, R. Egashira, ,T. Suda, A. Kayasuga, H. Kojima, H. Sakakibara, and K. Oiwa, “A Design of a Molecular Communication System for Nanomachines Using Molecular Motors”, Fourth Annual IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications and Workshops, March 2006.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Moritani, Y., S. Hiyama, and T. Suda, “Molecular Communication Among Nanomachines Using Vesicles”, 2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference, May 2006.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Nakano, T., and T. Suda, “Self-Organizing Network Services with Evolutionary Adaptation”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(5), 1269–1278, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Nakano, T., T. Suda, M. Moore, R. Egashira, A. Enomoto, and K. Arima, “Molecular Communication for Nanomachines Using Intercellular Calcium Signaling”, IEEE NANO 2005, June 2005.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Sasaki, Y., M. Hashizume, K. Maruo, N. Yamasaki, J. Kikuchi, Y. Moritani, S. Hiyama, and T. Suda, “Controlled Propagation in Molecular Communication Using Tagged Liposome Containers”, BIONETICS (Bio-Inspired mOdels of NEtwork, Information and Computing Systems) 2006, December 2006.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Suda, T., T. Itao, and M Matsuo, “The Bio-Networking Architecture: The Biologically Inspired Approach to the Design of Scalable, Adaptive, and Survivable/Available Network Applications”, In K. Park (ed.), The Internet as a Large-Scale Complex System, The Santafe Institute Book Series, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Suzuki, J., and T. Suda, “A Middleware Platform for a Biologically-Inspired Network Architecture Supporting Autonomous and Adaptive Applications”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC), Special Issue on Intelligent Services and Applications in Next Generation Networks, 23(2), 249–260, 2005.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Wang, M., and T. Suda, “The Bio-Networking Architecture: A Biologically Inspired Approach to the Design of Scalable, Adaptive, and Survivable/Available Network Applications”, Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Weiss, R., S. Basu, S. Hooshangi, A. Kalmbach, D. Karig, R. Mehreja, and I. Netravali, “Genetic Circuit Building Blocks for Cellular Computation, Communications, and Signal Processing”, Natural Computing, 2, 47–84, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Suda
    • 1
  • T. Nakano
    • 1
  • M. Moore
    • 1
  • K. Fujii
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations