Victor-Spaces: Virtual and Remote Experiments in Cooperative Knowledge Spaces

  • S. Cikic
  • S. Jeschke
  • N. Ludwig
  • U. Sinha
  • C. Thomsen
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

Cooperative knowledge spaces create new potentials for the experimental fields in natural sciences and engineering because they enhance the accessibility of experimental setups through virtual laboratories and remote technology, opening them for collaborative and distributed usage. A concept for extending existing virtual knowledge spaces for the means of the technological disciplines (“ViCToR-Spaces” – Virtual Cooperation in Teaching and Research for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Engineering) is presented. The integration of networked virtual laboratories and remote experiments will be described.

Keywords

Semantic Description Virtual Laboratory Service Broker Knowledge Space Virtual Room 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    U. M. Borghoff and J. H. Schlichter. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Introduction to Distributed Applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Cikic, S. Jeschke, and U. Sinha. “{ViCToR}-{S}paces: cooperative knowledge spaces for mathematics and natural sciences”. In T. C. Reeves and S. F. Yamashita, editors, Proceedings of the E-Learn 2006, pages 2358–2365. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Deleuze and F. Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN 1987.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Greenberg and M. Roseman. “Using a room metaphor to ease transitions in groupware”. In M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf, editors, Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, pages 203–256. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Jan. 2003.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. M. Haake, T. Schümmer, A. Haake, M. Bourimi, and B. Landgraf. “Two-level tailoring support for {CSCL}”. In J. Favela and D. Decouchant, editors, Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, volume 2806 of LNCS, pages 74–81, Springer, Berlin, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. M. Haake, T. Schümmer, A. Haake, M. Bourimi, and B. Landgraf. “Supporting flexible collaborative distance learning in the {CURE} platform”. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. IEEE Computer Society, Alamitos, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Hampel and R. Keil-Slawik. “sTeam: structuring information in a team – distributed knowledge management in cooperative learning environments”. J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 1(2):3, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Jeschke and T. Richter. “Mathematics in virtual knowledge spaces – user adaptation by intelligent assistants”. In R. Kaschek and K.-P. Jantke, editors, Intelligent Assistant Systems. Idea Group, Hershey, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Jeschke, T. Richter, H. Scheel, R. Seiler, and C. Thomsen. “The experiment in eLearning: magnetism in virtual and remote experiments”. In Conference Proceedings ICL 2005, Interactive Computer Aided Learning, Villach/Austria, Kassel/Germany, September 2005. Kassel University Press, Germany, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Jeschke, T. Richter, and R. Seiler. “VideoEasel: architecture of virtual laboratories for mathematics and natural sciences”. In A. Méndez-Vilas, B. González-Pereira, J. Mesa González, and J. A. Mesa González, editors, Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies, page 874 ff. FORMATEX, Badajoz, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Stahl. Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Thomsen, H. Scheel, and S. Morgner. “Remote experiments in experimental physics”. In Proceedings of the ISPRS E-Learning 2005, June 1–3, Potsdam, Germany, June 2005.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Wessner. “Kontextuelle Kooperation in virtuellen Lernumgebungen”, volume 8 of Schriften zu Kooperations- und Mediensystemen. Josef Eul Verlag, Lohmar–Köln, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Wessner, W. Shumar, G. Stahl, J. Sarmiento, M. Mühlpfordt, and S. Weimar. “Designing an online service for a math community”. In ICLS ’06: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, pages 818–824. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Cikic
    • 1
  • S. Jeschke
    • 2
  • N. Ludwig
    • 1
  • U. Sinha
    • 1
  • C. Thomsen
    • 1
  1. 1.MuLF-Center Technische Universität BerlinGermany
  2. 2.RUS - Center of Information TechnologiesUniversity of StuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations