Tool Point Dynamics Prediction

Keywords

Compatibility Condition Receptance Coupling Assembly Response Timoshenko Beam Model Rigid Body Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bishop, R. and Johnson, D., 1960, The Mechanics of Vibration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jetmundsen, B., Bielawa, R., and Flannelly, W., 1988, Generalized Frequency-Domain Substructure Synthesis, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 33: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmitz, T. and Donaldson, R., 2000, Predicting High-Speed Machining Dynamics by Substructure Analysis, Annals of the CIRP, 49/1: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmitz, T., Davies, M., and Kennedy, M., 2001, Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction for High-Speed Machining by RCSA, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 123: 700–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitz, T., Davies, M., Medicus, K., and Snyder, J., 2001, Improving High-Speed Machining Material Removal Rates by Rapid Dynamic Analysis, Annals of the CIRP, 50/1: 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns, T., Schmitz, T., 2004, Receptance Coupling Study of Tool-Length Dependent Dynamic Absorber Effect, Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2004-60081, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmitz, T., and Duncan, G.S., 2005, Three-Component Receptance Coupling Substructure Analysis for Tool Point Dynamics Prediction, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 127/4: 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duncan, G.S., Tummond, M., and Schmitz, T., 2005, An Investigation of the Dynamic Absorber Effect in High-Speed Machining, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45: 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, C.-H., Schmitz, T., Arakere, N., and Duncan, G.S., 2005, An Approach for Micro End mill Frequency Response Predictions, Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2005-81215, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burns, T. and Schmitz, T., 2005, A Study of Linear Joint and Tool Models in Spindle-Holder-Tool Receptance Coupling, Proceedings of 2005 American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2005-85275, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmitz, T., Powell, K., Won, D., Duncan, G.S., Sawyer, W.G., Ziegert, J., 2007, Shrink Fit Tool Holder Connection Stiffness/Damping Modeling for Frequency Response Prediction in Milling, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47/9: 1368–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng, C.-H., Duncan, G.S., and Schmitz, T., 2007, Rotating Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction using RCSA, Machining Science and Technology, 11/3: 433–446.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ewins, D., 1986, Analysis of Modified or Coupled Structures using FRF Properties, Report No. 86002, Imperial College London, Dynamics Section, Mechanical Engineering, London, England.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira, J. and Ewins, D., 1995, Nonlinear Receptance Coupling Approach Based on Describing Functions, Proceedings of the 14th International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, MI, 1034–1040.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lui, W. and Ewins, D., 2002, Substructure Synthesis via Elastic Media, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 257/2: 361-379.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmitz, T., Davies, M., and Kennedy, M., 2000, High-Speed Machining Frequency Response Prediction for Process Optimization, Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Improving Machine Tool Performance, La Baule, France.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, S., Altintas, Y., and Movahhedy, M., 2003, Receptance Coupling for End Mills, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43: 889–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomson, W. and Dahleh, M., 1998, Theory of Vibration with Application, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Section 9.5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chapra, S. and Canale, R., 1985, Numerical Methods for Engineers with Personal Computer Applications, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, Section 7.1.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomson, W. and Dahleh, M., 1998, Theory of Vibration with Application, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Section 3.9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beards, C., 1996, Structural Vibration: Analysis and Damping, Arnold, London, Section 2.2.5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weaver, W., Jr., Timoshenko, S., and Young, D., 1990, Vibration Problems in Engineering, 5th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, Section 5.12.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutchinson, J., 2001, Shear Coefficients for Timoshenko Beam Theory, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 68: 87–92.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmitz, T., and Duncan, G.S., 2005, Three-Component Receptance Coupling Substructure Analysis for Tool Point Dynamics Prediction, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 127/4: 781-790, Appendix A: Beam Receptance Modeling.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tlusty, J., Smith, S., and Winfough, W.R., 1996, Techniques for the Use of Long Slender End Mills in High-speed Milling, Annals of the CIRP, 45/1: 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davies, M., Dutterer, B., Pratt, J., and Schaut, A., 1998, On the Dynamics of High-Speed Milling with Long, Slender Endmills, Annals of the CIRP, 47/1: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sattinger, S., 1980, A Method for Experimentally Determining Rotational Mobilities of Structures, Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 50: 17–27.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ewins, D., 2000, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application, 2nd Ed., Research Studies Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kops, L. and Vo, D., 1990, Determination of the Equivalent Diameter of an End Mill Based on its Compliance, Annals of the CIRP, 39/1: 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kivanc, E. and Budak, E., 2004, Structural Modeling of End Mills for Form Error and Stability Analysis, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44: 1151–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesville
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science Dept.University of North CarolinaCharlotte

Personalised recommendations