Advertisement

Social Movement as Cognitive Praxis: The Case of the Student Movement and the Labor Movement in Hong Kong

  • Benjamin K.P. Leung
Chapter
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)

Abstract

The study of social movements has until recently been concerned mainly with their causes, their course of development, and their demise. The major theoretical positions have been classified by Doug McAdam (1982) into three models: the classical model, the resource mobilization model, and the political process model. The theoretical advancement has proceeded from a focus on the social structural causes of social movements (classical model), to an emphasis on the resources and mobilization of challenger groups (resource mobilization model), culminating finally in an approach which perceives social movements as the end product of the confluence of political opportunities, the organizational strength of the challenger groups, and the cognitive liberation of the prospective movement participants (the political process model).

Keywords

Social Movement Union Membership Labor Movement Cultural Revolution Union Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chan, King-cheung. 1987. “The Hong Kong Student Movement.” in The Hong Kong Constitution and Politics, edited by Y. S. Cheng. Hong Kong: Cosmos Press (translation by author).Google Scholar
  2. Chuek, Chai. 1978. “Viewing the Hong Kong Student Movement through the Hong Kong University Student Union.” in The Hong Kong Student Movement—Retrospect and Examination, edited by Hong Kong Federation of Students. Hong Kong: Wide Angle Press (translation by author).Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, John. 1970. The Colony in Conflict. Hong Kong: SwindonGoogle Scholar
  4. England, Joe. 1979. “Trade Unionism and Industrial Disputes in Hong Kong: An Explanatory Framework.” in Social Tensions, Labor Market Conditions and Industrial Conflict, edited by Japan Institute of Labor. Japan: Institute of Labor.Google Scholar
  5. England, Joe. 1989. Industrial Relations and Law in Hong Kong. 2d ed. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eyerman, Ron and Andrew Jamieson. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Louie, Kin-Sheun. 1991. “Political Parties.” in The Other Hong Kong Report, edited by Y.-W. Sung and L. Ming-Kwan. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  8. McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations