Postscript

  • A. J. Meadows
Chapter
Part of the Macmillan Science book series (MACSCI)

Abstract

In the years since this book was first published, research has marched inexorably onwards. The spread of Lockyer’s interests was broad, and all the topics that concerned him have received attention, though some more than others. The purpose of this postscript is to explore how the more recent studies reflect on his life and work. (The numbers in square brackets indicate the pages in the main text of this book relevant to the discussion.)

Keywords

Solar Eclipse Stellar Evolution Royal Astronomical Society American Astronomer Ancient Monument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    S. Sheets-Pyenson ‘Popular science periodicals in Paris and London: the emergence of a low scientific culture, 1820–1875’ Annals of Science, 42, 549–72. (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Hentschel Mapping the Spectrum: Techniques of Visual Representation in Research and Teaching (Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2002), p. 217.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Barton ‘Just before Nature: the purposes of science and the purposes of popularization in some English popular science journals of the 1860s’ Annals of Science, 55, 1–33 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. J. Worth Macmillans Magazine, 1859–907: ‘No Flippancy or Abuse Allowed’ (Ashgate, Aldershot; 2003), p. 33.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Barton ‘Scientific authority and scientific controversy in Nature: North Britain against the X club’ In: L. Henson, G. Cantor, G. Dawson, R. Noakes, S. Shuttleworth and J. R. Topham (eds.) Culture and Science in the Nineteenth-century Media (Ashgate, Aldershot; 2004), pp. 223–35.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Dawson ‘Victorian periodicals and the making of William Kingdom Clifford’s posthumous reputation’ In: G. Cantor and S. Shuttleworth (eds.) Science Serialized: Representations of the Sciences in Nineteenth-century Periodicals (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.; 2004), pp. 259–84.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Gooday ‘Sunspots, weather, and the unseen universe: Balfour Stewart’s anti-materialist representations of “energy” in British periodicals’ In: G. Cantor and S. Shuttleworth (eds.) op. cit., pp. 111–47.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Barton op. cit.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Lightman ‘Knowledge confronts Nature: Richard Proctor and popular science periodicals’ In: L. Henson et al. (eds.) op. cit., pp. 199–210. For further discussion of Proctor and of Victorian popular science writing in general, see: B. Lightman Victorian Popularisers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences (University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Beer ‘The Academy: Europe in England’ In: G. Cantor and S. Shuttleworth (eds.) op. cit., pp. 181–98.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. MacLeod ‘The support of Victorian science: the Endowment of Research Movement in Great Britain, 1868–1900’ In: R. MacLeod Public Science and Public Policy in Victorian England (Ashgate Variorum, Aldershot; 1996), Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. MacLeod ibid. p. 209.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. A. Roos ‘The “aims and intentions” of Nature’ In: J. Paradis and T Postlewait (eds.) Victorian science and Victorian values: literary perspectives (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ; 1985), pp. 159–80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R White ‘Cross-cultural encounters: the co-production of science and literature in mid-Victorian periodicals’ In: R. Luckhurst and J. McDonagh (eds.) Transactions and Encounters: Science and Culture in the Nineteenth Century (Manchester University Press, Manchester; 2002), pp. 75–95.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Aubin and C. Bigg Neither genius nor context incarnate: Norman Lock-yer, Jules Janssen and the astrophysical self In: T Söderqvist (ed.) The History and Poetics of Scientific Biography (Ashgate, Aldershot; 2007), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. MacLeod ‘Science for Imperial efficiency and social change: reflections on the British Science Guild, 1905–1936’ Public Understanding of Science, 3, 155–93 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. MacLeod ibid. p. 170.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. MacLeod ibid. p. 180.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. MacLeod ‘Science and the Treasury: principles, personalities and poli-cies, 1870–1885’ In: R. MacLeod Public Science and Public Policy in Victorian England (Ashgate Variorum, Aldershot; 1996), Chapter 7, p. 150.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. MacLeod ibid. p. 151.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. MacLeod ibid.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. MacLeod ‘The Royal Society and the Government Grant: notes on the administration of scientific research, 1849–1914’ In: R. MacLeod Public Science and Public Policy in Victorian England (Ashgate Variorum, Aldershot; 1996), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. MacLeod ibid. p. 356.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. S.-K. Pang Empire and the Sun: Victorian Solar Eclipse Expeditions (Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif; 2002), p. 66.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. S.-K. Pang ibid. p. 45.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. S.-K. Pang ibid. p. 22.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. S.-K. Pang ibid. p. 110.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P Amalric ‘Jules Janssen (1824–1907): from ophthalmology to astronomy’ Documenta Ophthalmoligica, 81, 37–42 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Aubin and C. Bigg op. cit.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. A. Russell Edward Frankland: chemistry, controversy and conspirancy in Victorian England (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1996).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. A. Russell ibid. p. 437.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. J. Meadows ‘The origins of astrophysics’ In: O. Gingerich (ed.) Astrophysics and Twentieth-Century Astronomy to 1950: Part A (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1984), p. 5.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    B. J. Becker ‘Visionary memories: William Huggins and the origins of astrophysics’ Journal for the History of Astronomy, 32, 43–62 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. J. Meadows ‘The new astronomy’ In: O. Gingerich (ed.) op. cit. p. 61.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. J. Meadows ‘The origins of astrophysics’ In: O. Gingerich (ed.) op. cit. p. 8Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. Schaffer ‘Where experiments end: table top trials in Victorian astronomy’ In: J. Z. Buchwald (ed.) Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1995), pp. 257–99.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. J. Becker Eclecticism, opportunism, and the evolution of a new research agenda: William and Margaret Huggins and the origins of astrophysics Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University (1993), Chapter 6, Part 1, Ref. 11. [https://eee.uci.edu/clients/bjbecker/huggins/]Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    K. Hentschel op. cit. p. 165.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    K. Hentschel ibid. p. 224Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. T. Brück Agnes Mary Clerke and the Rise of Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2002), p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    B. J. Becker Eclecticism, opportunism, and the evolution of a new research agenda: William and Margaret Huggins and the origins of astrophysics op. cit. Chapter 4, Part 2.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. T. Brück op. cit. p. 82.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    D. DeVorkin ‘Stellar evolution and the origin of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram’ In: O. Gingerich (ed.) op. cit. p. 93.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. DeVorkin Henry Norris Russell, Dean of American Astronomers (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; 2000), p. 30.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. DeVorkin ibid. p. 94.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. DeVorkin ibid. p. 96.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    D. DeVorkin ibid. p. 95.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. B. Hearnshaw The Analysis of Starlight: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Astronomical Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1986), p. 286.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    J. B. Hearnshaw op. cit. p. 76.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    D. DeVorkin Henry Norris Russell, Dean of American Astronomers op. cit. p. 136.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    D. DeVorkin Henry Norris Russell, Dean of American Astronomers op. cit. p.337Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. Gay The History of Imperial College London 1907–2007: Higher Education and Research in Science, Technology and Medicine (Imperial College Press, London; 2007), p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    C. A. Russell op. cit. p. 307.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    K. Hentschel op. cit. p. 388.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    ibid. p. 409.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    V Trajkovska and S. Ninkovic ‘Lockyer’s “Astronomy” among Serbs in the second half of the 19th century’ Publications of the Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, 56, 51–7 (1997).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    K. Anderson Predicting the Weather: Victorians and the Science of Meteorology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 2005), p. 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    W. J. Burroughs Weather Cycles Real or Imaginary? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1992), p. 8.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    S. M. R. Ansari ‘The establishment of observatories and the socio-economic conditions of scientific work in nineteenth century India’ Indian Jour-nal of History of Science, 13, 62–71 (1978).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. K. Kochhar ‘The growth of modern astronomy in India, 1651–1960’ Vistas in Astronomy, 34, 69–105 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    ibid. p. 95.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    ibid. p. 96.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/citd/holtorf/5.3.4.html.
  65. 65.
    C. Chippindale Stonehenge Complete (Thames and Hudson, London; 1983), p. 240.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    G. S. Hawkins Stonehenge Decoded (Souvenir Press, London; 1966), p. 90.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    M. Shaltout and J. A. Belmonte ‘On the orientation of ancient Egyptian temples I: Upper Egypt and Lower Nubia’ Journal for the History of Astronomy, 36, 273–98 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    G. Wilkins ‘The history and development of the Norman Lockyer Observatory’ In: K. Sheldon Federation of Astronomical Societies Handbook 1997, pp. 5–10 (F.A.S., Norwich; 1997).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    G. A. Wilkins ‘The Lockyer ladies’ The Antiquarian Astronomer, Issue 3, 101–6 (2006).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    M.T. Brück op. cit. p. 85.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    ibid. p. 173.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    http://www.nature.com/nature/history/timeline_1910s.html.
  73. 73.
    A. Chapman The Victorian Amateur Astronomer: Independent Astronomical Research in Britain, 1820–1920 (John Wiley, Chichester; 1998).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    A. J. Meadows ‘Sir Joseph Norman Lockyer’ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2004).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    B. J. Becker ‘Sir William Huggins’ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2004).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    J. Lankford ‘Amateurs and astrophysics: a neglected aspect in the development of a scientific speciality’ Social Studies of Science, 11, 275–303 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    K. Hufbauer ‘Amateurs and the rise of astrophysics 1840–1910’ Berichte zu Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 9, 183–90 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Additional reading Google Scholar
  79. Besides the material cited in the references above, the following books, published since the first edition, provide information on some of the people and institutions relevant to Lockyer’s life.Google Scholar
  80. W. H. Brock, William Crookes (1832–1919) and the commercialization of science (Ashgate, Aldershot; 2008).Google Scholar
  81. W. H. Brock, N. D. McMillan and R. C. Mollan (eds.) John Tyndall: Essays on a Natural Philosopher (Royal Dublin Society, Dublin; 1981).Google Scholar
  82. A. Desmond Huxley: the Devivs Disciple (Michael Joseph, London; 1994).Google Scholar
  83. A. R. Hall Science for Industry: a Short History of the Imperial College of Science and Technology and its Antecedents (Imperial College Press, London; 1982).Google Scholar
  84. M. B. Hall AH Scientists Now: the Royal Society in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1984).Google Scholar
  85. J. Meadows The Victorian Scientist: the Growth of a Profession (British Library, London; 2004).Google Scholar
  86. C. Smith and M. N. Wise Energy and Empire (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1989).Google Scholar
  87. D. B. Wilson Kelvin and Stokes: a Comparative Study in Victorian Physics (Adam Hilger, Bristol; 1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© A. J. Meadows 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Meadows

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations