Ideal-Gas Like Markets: Effect of Savings

  • Arnab Chatterjee
  • Bikas K Chakrabarti
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

We discuss the ideal gas like models of a trading market. The effect of savings on the distribution have been thoroughly reviewed. The market with fixed saving factors leads to a Gamma-like distribution. In a market with quenched random saving factors for its agents we show that the steady state income (m) distribution P(m) in the model has a power law tail with Pareto index v equal to unity. We also discuss the detailed numerical results on this model. We analyze the distribution of mutual money difference and also develop a master equation for the time development of P(m). Precise solutions are then obtained in some special cases.

Keywords

Income Distribution Master Equation Pareto Distribution Wealth Distribution Trading Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pareto V (1897) Cours d’economie Politique. F. Rouge, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moss de Oliveira S, de Oliveira PMC, Stauffer D (1999) Evolution, Money, War and Computers. B. G. Tuebner, Stuttgart, LeipzigCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy M, Solomon S (1997) New evidence for the power-law distribution of wealth, Physica A 242:90–94; Drăgulescu AA, Yakovenko VM (2001) Exponential and Power-Law Probability Distributions of Wealth and Income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A 299:213–221; Aoyama H, Souma W, Fujiwara Y (2003) Growth and fluctuations of personal and company’s income, Physica A 324:352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Matteo T, Aste T, Hyde ST (2003) Exchanges in Complex Networks: Income and Wealth Distributions, cond-mat/0310544; Clementi F, Gallegati M (2005), Power Law Tails in the Italian Personal Income Distribution. Physica A 350:427–438Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinha S (2005) Evidence for Power-law Tail of the Wealth Distribution in India, cond-mat/0502166Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakrabarti BK, Marjit S (1995) Self-organization in Game of Life and Economics,Indian J. Phys. B69:681–698; Ispolatov S, Krapivsky PL, Redner S (1998) Wealth distributions in asset exchange models, Eur. Phys. J. B 2:267Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drăgulescu AA, Yakovenko VM (2000) Statistical Mechanics of Money, Eur. Phys. J. B 17:723–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chakraborti A, Chakrabarti BK (2000) Statistical Mechanics of Money: Effects of Saving Propensity, Eur. Phys. J. B 17:167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chakraborti A (2002) Distributions of money in model markets of economy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13:1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayes B (2002) Follow the Money, American Scientist, USA, 90:(Sept–Oct)400–405Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chakraborti A, Pradhan S, Chakrabarti BK (2001) A Self-organizing Market Model with single Commodity, Physica A 297:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK, Manna SS (2004) Pareto Law in a Kinetic Model of Market with Random Saving Propensity, Physica A 335:155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK; Manna SS (2003) Money in Gas-like Markets: Gibbs and Pareto Laws, Physica Scripta T 106:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chakrabarti BK, Chatterjee A (2004) Ideal Gas-Like Distributions in Economics: Effects of Saving Propensity, in Application of Econophysics, Proc. 2nd Nikkei Econophys. Symp., Ed. Takayasu H, Springer, Tokyo, pp. 280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinha S (2003) Stochastic Maps, Wealth Distribution in Random Asset Exchange Models and the Marginal Utility of Relative Wealth, Phys. Scripta T106:59–64; Ferrero JC (2004) The statistical distribution of money and the rate of money transference, Physica A 341:575; Iglesias JR, Gonçalves S, Abramson G, Vega JL (2004) Correlation between risk aversion and wealth distribution, Physica A 342:186; Scafetta N, Picozzi S, West BJ (2004) A trade-investment model for distribution of wealth, Physica D 193:338–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slanina F (2004) Inelastically scattering particles and wealth distribution in an open economy, Phys. Rev. E 69:046102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    See e.g, Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1968), Statistical Physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samuelson PA (1980) Economics. Mc-Graw Hill Int., Auckland.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Willis G, Mimkes J (2004) Evidence for the Independence of Waged and Unwaged Income, Evidence for Boltzmann Distributions in Waged Income, and the Outlines of a Coherent Theory of Income Distribution, cond-mat/0406694Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Das A, Yarlagadda S (2003) Analytic treatment of a trading market model, Phys. Scripta T106:39–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patriarca M, Chakraborti A, Kaski K (2004) A Statistical model with a standard Γ distribution, Phys. Rev. E 70:016104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Repetowicz P, Hutzler S, Richmond P (2004) Dynamics of Money and Income Distributions, cond-mat/0407770Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ding N, Xi N, Wang Y (2003) Effects of saving and spending patterns on holding time distribution, Eur. Phys. J. B 36:149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bak P (1997) How Nature works. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK, Stinchcombe RB (2005) Master equation for a kinetic model of trading market and its analytic solution, cond-mat/0501413Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK, Stinchcombe RB (2005) Analyzing money distributions in ‘ideal gas’ models of markets, in ‘Practical Fruits of Econophysics’, Ed. Takayasu H, Springer-Berlag, Tokyo Proc. Third Nikkei Symposium on Econophysics, Tokyo, Japan, 2004, cond-mat/0501413Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dynan KE, Skinner J, Zeldes SP (2004) Do the rich save more ?, J. Pol. Econ. 112: 397–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnab Chatterjee
    • 1
  • Bikas K Chakrabarti
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics Division and Centre for Applied Mathematics and Computational ScienceSaha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations