Do We All Face the Same Constraints?

  • Mishael Milaković
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


There seems to be widespread agreement on the functional form of wealth and income distributions observing a power law tail [3, 13, 9, 14], while the left part of wealth and income distributions is somewhat more controversial and typically found to follow an exponential or Gamma-like distribution [1, 3, 13, 11]. The presentations by Clementi, Galegatti, Fujiwara, Souma, Sinha, and Yakovenko at this conference certainly point in the same direction but the evidence on income distributions clearly outweighs that on wealth—which is hardly surprising because it is much easier to observe income flows than the stock of wealth. None the less, we would like to focus our attention on the distribution of wealth and argue that the observed distributional regularities are statistical equilibrium outcomes of two distinct economic processes.


Wealth Distribution Maximum Entropy Principle Wealth Level Personal Wealth Mortgage Debt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dagum C, Zenga M (1990) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davies JB, Shorrocks AF (2000), The Distribution of Wealth, Handbook of Income Distribution, Eds. Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F, Elsevier Science BV, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drăgulescu AA, Yakovenko VM (2001) Exponential and Power Law Probability Distributions of Wealth and Income in the UK and US, Physica A 299:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Folbre N (1995) The New Field Guide to the U.S. Economy, The New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foley DK (1994) A Statistical Equilibrium Theory of Markets, Journal of Economic Theory, 62:321–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaynes ET (1989) Where Do We Stand on Maximum Entropy? in Rosenkrantz RD Ed. E. T. Jaynes: Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kapur JN (1989) Maximum-Entropy Models in Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kapur JN, Kesavan HK (1992) Entropy Optimization Principles with Applications, Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy M, Solomon S (1997) New Evidence for the Power Law Distribution of Wealth, Physica A 242:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milaković M (2003) Towards a Statistical Equilibrium Theory of Wealth Distribution, Ph. D Thesis, New School University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Persky JJ (1992) Pareto’s Law, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shorrocks AF (1982) The Portfolio Composition of Asset Holdings in the UK, Economic Journal 92:268–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva AC, Yakovenko VM (2005) Temporal Evolution of the “Thermal” and “Superthermal” Income Classes in the USA during 1983–2001, Europhysics Letters 69:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolff EN (1987) Ed. International Comparisons of the Distribution of Household Wealth, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolff EN (1996) Top Heavy: The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in America and What Can Be Done about It, The New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolff EN (2000) Why Has Median Wealth Grown So Slowly in the 1990s? Working Paper, New York University, November.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mishael Milaković
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KielKiel

Personalised recommendations