Advertisement

EU Free Trade Agreements as an Instrument of Promoting the Rule of Law in Third Countries: A Framework Paper

  • Maryna RabinovychEmail author
Chapter
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR, volume 10)

Abstract

This contribution explores the EU FTAs as an instrument of promoting the rule of law to third states. The background to this research is formed by the trend towards the rise of normative contestation globally and EU-wide; the EU’s shift to the “deep” bi- and plurilateral trade liberalization agenda following the deadlock of the WTO Doha Round and its ongoing efforts to strengthen the coherence of its external action. First, the paper refers to the rule of law as a fundamental value of the EU and operationalizes it. Next, it explores the foundational (“framework”) foreign policy and legal prerequisites behind the EU’s promotion of the rule of law through FTAs (the interplay between economic and normative objectives in the EU external action, the nature of EU power in external trade relations, its bargaining power in trade negotiations, legal basis and scope of FTAs that can be instrumentalised by the EU to promote values). Finally, the paper uses the example of administrative cooperation and public procurement chapters of three categories of EU FTAs (SAAs with Western Balkans, AAs with Eastern Neighbours and EU-CARIFORUM EPA) to illustrate the rule of law promotion potential of the EU FTAs.

References

  1. Aggestam E (2013) Global norms and European power. In: Jorgensen E et al (eds) Routledge handbook on the European Union and international institutions. Palgrave McMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo B (2014) The EU’s deep trade agenda: stumbling block or stepping stone towards multilateral liberalization? In: Herrmann C, Krajewski M, Terhechte J (eds) European yearbook of international economic law 2014. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo B (2016) The EU deep trade agenda: law and policy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biscop S (2016) The EU global strategy: Realpolitik with European characteristics. Egmont Institute Security Policy Brief 75Google Scholar
  5. Bovens M (2007) Public accountability. In: Ferlie E et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Busuioc E (2013) European agencies: law and practices of accountability. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cianetti L, Dawson J, Hanley S (2018) Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe: looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East Eur Polit 34(3):243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clapham C (1996) Africa and the international system: the politics of state survival. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damro C (2012) Market power Europe. J Eur Public Policy 19(5):682–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dicey A (1985) Introduction to the study of the law of the Constitution, 10th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncombe C, Dunne T (2018) After liberal world order. Int Aff 94:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erbeznik K (2011) Money can’t buy you law: the effects of foreign aid on the rule of law in developing countries. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud 18:873–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freyburg T, Lavenex S, Schimmelfennig F, Skripka T, Wetzel A (2011) Democracy promotion through functional cooperation? The case of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Democratization 18(4):1026–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gammage C (2017) North-South regional trade agreements as legal regimes. A critical assessment of the EU-SADC Economic Partnership Agreement. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grimm S, Mathis O (2017) Democratization via aid? The European Union’s democracy promotion in the Western Balkans 1994–2010. Eur Union Polit 19(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hachez N (2015) “Essential Elements” clauses in EU trade agreements: making trade work in a way that helps human rights. Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies No 158. https://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/working_papers/2015/158hachez. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  17. Hallstein W (1979) Die Europäische Gemeinschaft. ECON, MunichGoogle Scholar
  18. Haukkala H (2011) The European Union as regional normative hegemon: the case of European Neighbourhood Policy. In: Whitman R (ed) Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 1601–1622Google Scholar
  19. Heinemann A (2007) International antitrust and intellectual property. In: Heath C, Sanders A (eds) Intellectual property and free trade agreements. Bloomsbury, Oxford, pp 261–283Google Scholar
  20. Hirschmann A (1980) National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofmann CH (2008) Mapping the European administrative space. West Eur Polit 31(4):662–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooghe L, Marks G (2016) Europe’s crises and political contestation. Paper presented at the Conference, “Theory Meets Crisis”, pp 2–4, Robert Schuman Center, EUI. http://www.euengage.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Hooghe-Marks-Europes-Crises-and-Political-Contestation.pdf. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  23. Juncos A (2017) Resilience as a new European foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? Eur Secur 26(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karageorgou V (2014) Transparency as an evolving principle of EU law: regulative contours and implications. Rights2Info. https://www.right2info.org/resources/publications/eu-karageorgou-vasiliki-transparency-principle-as-an-evolving-principle-of-eu-law. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  25. Kube V (2016) The European Union’s external human rights commitment: what is the legal value of Art. 21 TEU? EUI Law 2016/10. http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/40426. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  26. Lamprecht J (2014) Bargaining power in multilateral trade negotiations: Canada and Japan in the Uruguay Round and Doha Development Agenda. London School of Economics. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/903/1/Lamprecht_Bargaining_power_multilateral_trade_negotiations.pdf. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  27. Larik L (2016) Foreign policy objectives in European constitutional law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lavenex S (2015) The external face of differentiated integration: third country participation in EU sectoral bodies. J Eur Public Policy 22(6):836–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Mark Stud 40(2):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meunier S, Nicolaïdis K (2006) The European Union as a conflicted trade power. J Eur Public Policy 13(6):906–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pech L (2009) The rule of law as a constitutional principle of the European Union. Jean Monnet Working Paper Series 4, pp 22–47. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1463242. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  32. Pech L (2012/2013) Rule of law as a guiding principle of the European Union’s external action. CLEER Working Papers 2012/2013. https://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/2102012_33322cleer2012-3web.pdf. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  33. Petrov R, Van der Loo G, Van Elsuwege P (2015) The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: a new instrument of integration without membership. Kyiv-Mohyla Law Polit J (1):1–15Google Scholar
  34. Rabinovych M (2017) The rule of law promotion through trade in the “Associated Neighbourhood”. Polish Yearb Int Law. XXXVII:71–101Google Scholar
  35. Risse T, Babayan N (2015) Democracy promotion and the challenge of illiberal regional powers: introduction to the special issue. Democratization 22:381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodrik D (2006) Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A review of the World Bank’s economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform. J Econ Lit XLIV:973–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schimelfennig F, Sedelmeier U (2004) Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. J Eur Public Policy 11(4):669–687Google Scholar
  38. Sheppele K, Pech L (2018) What is rule of law backsliding? Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/what-is-rule-of-law-backsliding/. Last accessed 8 Feb 2019
  39. Torma A (2011) The European Administrative Space (EAS). Eur Integr Stud 9(1):149–161Google Scholar
  40. Tussie D, Saguier M (2013) The sweep of asymmetric trade negotiations: introduction and overview. In: Bilal S et al (eds) Asymmetric trade negotiations. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  41. Van der Loo G (2016) The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and deep and comprehensive free trade area: a new legal instrument for integration without membership. Brill, NijhofGoogle Scholar
  42. Wetzel A (2015) The substance of EU democracy promotion: introduction and conceptual framework. In: Wetzel A, Orbie J (eds) The substance of EU democracy promotion: concepts and cases. Palgrave McMillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations