Externalization of Consciousness. Scientific Possibilities and Clinical Implications
The paper starts by analyzing recent advancements in neurotechnological assessment of residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness and in neurotechnology-mediated communication with them. Ethical issues arising from these developments are described, with particular focus on informed consent. Against this background, we argue for the necessity of further scientific efforts and ethical reflection in neurotechnological assessment of consciousness and ‘cerebral communication’ with verbally non-communicative patients.
KeywordsConsciousness Disorders of consciousness Neurotechnology Informed consent
This work was done within the European Human Brain Project. The text reflects solely the views of its authors. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
- American Psychiatric Association (1998) Guidelines for assessing the decision-making capacities of potential research subjects with cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry 155:1649–1650Google Scholar
- Appelbaum PS-Grisso T (1988) Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 319(25):1635–1638Google Scholar
- Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR., Casarotto S, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Tononi G, Massimini M (2013) A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Trans Med 5:198ra105. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294
- Dehaene S, Changeux JP, Naccache L (2011) The global neuronal workspace model of conscious access: from neuronal architectures to clinical applications. In: Dehaene S, Christen Y (eds) Characterizing consciousness: from cognition to the clinic research and perspectives in neurosciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 55–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Faden RR, Beauchamp TL (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Grisso T, Appelbaum PS (1998) Assessing competence to consent to treatment. A guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford University Press, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Laureys S, Boly M, Tononi G (2009) Functional neuroimaging. In: Laureys S, Tononi G (eds) The neurology of consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropathology. Elsevier, London, pp 31–42Google Scholar
- Lulé D, Noirhomme Q, Kleih SC, Chatelle C, Halder S, Demertzi A, Bruno MA, Gosseries O, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Thonnard M, Soddu A, Kübler A, Laureys S (2013) Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol 124(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peterson A, Naci L, Weijer C, Cruse D, Fernández-Espejo Davinia, Graham Makenzie, Owen AM (2013) Assessing decision-making capacity in the behaviorally nonresponsive patient with residual covert awareness. AJOB Neurosci 4(4):3–14Google Scholar
- Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Moonen G, Laureys S (2009b) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-35 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar