Advertisement

pp 1-17 | Cite as

Fluorescent Probes for Diagnostics of β-Galactosidase: From Micro to Macro

  • Anyao Bi
  • Xinchen Jiang
  • Tang Gao
  • Shuqi Yang
  • Yi Liu
  • Xiaohui Liu
  • Wenbin Zeng
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Medicinal Chemistry book series

Abstract

β-Galactosidase (β-gal) is an enzyme commonly served as a reporter for the examination of transcription and transfection efficiencies. Due to its overexpression in primary and metastatic ovarian cancers, β-gal was also usually regarded as a molecular target for visualizing peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancers. Moreover, β-gal has been studied as a potential therapeutic target for lactose intolerance via gene replacement therapy in recent years. Interestingly, there were some reports that β-gal has been abnormally accumulated in senescent cells, which allowing this senescence-associated β-gal to be a significant biomarker for senescence. The great significance of β-gal has attracted many researchers’ attentions in developing highly selective and sensitive approaches to monitor the activity of this enzyme in vitro and in vivo. In this review, we reported the recent development of the various materials for β-gal detection and their application in disease progression monitoring, with a focus on fluorescent probe, nanomaterials, and biomolecules. Finally, the trends for the further development of the probe for fluorescence-guided diagnosis in clinical cases and its preclinical potential value were proposed.

Keywords

β-Galactosidase AIE Fluorescence Nanomaterials Tumor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971678, 81671756), Key Research Project of Science and Technology Foundation of Hunan Province (2017SK2093 and 2019SK2211), Key Research Project of Science and Technology Foundation of Changsha (kq1801063), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2018zzts041, 2018dcyj067).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest: There are no conflicts to declare.

Ethical Approval: There is no ethical approval to declare.

Informed Consent: There is no informed consent to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Alam J, Cook JL (1990) Reporter genes: application to the study of mammalian gene transcription. Anal Biochem 188(2):245Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chatterjee SK, Bhattacharya M, Barlow JJ (1979) Glycosyltransferase and glycosidase activities in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Res 39(6):1943Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salehi S, Eckley L, Sawyer GJ et al (2009) Intestinal lactase as an autologous beta-galactosidase reporter gene for in vivo gene expression studies. Hum Gene Ther 20(1):21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kodibagkar VD, Yu J, Liu L et al (2006) Imaging β-galactosidase activity using 19F chemical shift imaging of LacZ gene-reporter molecule 2-fluoro-4-nitrophenol-β-d-galactopyranoside. Magn Reson Imaging 24(7):959Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Dort ME, Lee KC, Hamilton CA et al (2008) Radiosynthesis and evaluation of 5-[125i]iodoindol-3-yl-β-d-galactopyranoside ([125i]IBDG) as a β-galactosidase imaging radioligand. Mol Imaging 7(4):187Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Celen S, Deroose C, De Groot T et al (2008) Synthesis and evaluation of F-18- and C-11-labeled phenyl-galactopyranosides as potential probes for in vivo visualization of LacZ gene expression using positron emission tomography. Bioconjug Chem 19(2):441Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamamoto A, Adachi S, Kawamura S et al (1974) Localized β-galactosidase deficiency. Arch Intern Med 134(4):627Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang YZ, Naleway JJ, Larison KD et al (1991) Detecting lacZ gene expression in living cells with new lipophilic, fluorogenic beta-galactosidase substrates. FASEB J 5(15):3108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Feng B, Cao X et al (2019) A novel “AIE + ESIPT” near-infrared nanoprobe for the imaging of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase in living cells and the application in precision medicine. Analyst 144:5136–5142.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c9an00773cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wehrman TS, Von DG, Krutzik PO et al (2006) Luminescent imaging of beta-galactosidase activity in living subjects using sequential reporter-enzyme luminescence. Nat Methods 3(4):295Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee HW, Heo CH, Sen D et al (2014) Ratiometric two-photon fluorescent probe for quantitative detection of β-galactosidase activity in senescent cells. Anal Chem 86(20):10001Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirabayashi K, Hanaoka K, Takayanagi T et al (2015) Analysis of chemical equilibrium of silicon-substituted fluorescein and its application to develop a scaffold for red fluorescent probes. Anal Chem 87(17):9061Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asanuma D, Sakabe M, Kamiya M et al (2015) Sensitive β-galactosidase-targeting fluorescence probe for visualizing small peritoneal metastatic tumours in vivo. Nat Commun 6:6463Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang XX, Wu H, Li P et al (2016) A versatile two-photon fluorescent probe for ratiometric imaging E. coli β-galactosidase in live cells and in vivo. Chem Commun 52(53):8283Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Redykeisar O, Kisinfinfer E, Ferber S et al (2014) Synthesis and use of QCy7-derived modular probes for the detection and imaging of biologically relevant analytes. Nat Protoc 9(1):27Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han J, Han MS, Tung CH (2013) A fluorogenic probe for β-galactosidase activity imaging in living cells. Mol BioSyst 9(12):3001Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gu K, Xu Y, Li H et al (2016) Real-time tracking and in vivo visualization of β-galactosidase activity in colorectal tumor with a ratiometric near-infrared fluorescent probe. J Am Chem Soc 138(16):5334Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berezin MY, Achilefu S (2010) Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging. Chem Rev 110(5):2641Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsieh CC, Cheng YM, Hsu CJ et al (2008) Spectroscopy and femtosecond dynamics of excited-state proton transfer induced charge transfer reaction. J Phys Chem A 112(36):8323Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murale DP, Kim H, Choi WS et al (2013) Highly selective excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT)-based superoxide probing. Org Lett 15(15):3946Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Otsubo T, Minami A, Fujii H et al (2013) 2-(Benzothiazol-2-yl)-phenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside derivatives as fluorescent pigment dyeing substrates and their application for the assay of β-d-galactosidase activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 23(7):2245Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cellier M, Fazackerley E, James AL, Orenga S, Perry JD, Turnbull G, Stanforth SP (2014) Synthesis of 2-arylbenzothiazole derivatives and their application in bacterial detection. Bioorg Med Chem 22(4):1250Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei X, Wu Q, Zhang J et al (2016) Synthesis of precipitating chromogenic/fluorogenic β-glucosidase/β-galactosidase substrates by a new method and their application in the visual detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Chem Commun 53(1):103Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mei J, Leung NLC, Kwok RTK et al (2015) Aggregation-induced emission: together we shine, united we soar! Chem Rev 115(21):11718Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    He XP, Zang Y, James TD et al (2016) Fluorescent glycoprobes: a sweet addition for improved sensing. Chem Commun 53(1):82Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dong Y, Wang W, Zhong C et al (2014) Investigating the effects of side chain length on the AIE properties of water-soluble TPE derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett 55(8):1496Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cao D, Yang L, Wang L (2014) Application of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) systems in sensing and bioimaging. Curr Org Chem 18(8):1028Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng L, Gao M, Cai X et al (2015) A fluorescent light-up probe based on AIE and ESIPT processes for β-galactosidase activity detection and visualization in living cells. J Mater Chem B 3(47):9168Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang G, Zeng G, Zhu W et al (2017) A selective and light-up fluorescent probe for β-galactosidase activity detection and imaging in living cells based on an AIE tetraphenylethylene derivative. Chem Commun 53(32):4505Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang Y, Feng H, Liu W et al (2017) Cation-driven luminescent self-assembled dots of copper nanoclusters with aggregation-induced emission for β-galactosidase activity monitoring. J Mater Chem B 5:5120Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jia X, Li J, Wang E (2013) Cu nanoclusters with aggregation induced emission enhancement. Small 9(22):3873Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jia X, Yang X, Li J et al (2014) Stable Cu nanoclusters: from an aggregation-induced emission mechanism to biosensing and catalytic applications. Chem Commun 50(2):237Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu Z, Liu J, Gao Y et al (2015) Assembly-induced enhancement of Cu nanoclusters luminescence with mechanochromic property. J Am Chem Soc 137(40):12906Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen PC, Li YC, Ma JY et al (2016) Size-tunable copper nanocluster aggregates and their application in hydrogen sulfide sensing on paper-based devices. Sci Rep 6:24882Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Agostini A, Mondragón L, Bernardos A et al (2012) Targeted cargo delivery in senescent cells using capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(42):10556Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Antropova YG, Bryantsev AL, Kalinina NI et al (2002) Proliferative activity and expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 and p53 protein in endothelial cells of human aorta during replicative aging in vitro. Bull Exp Biol Med 134(1):81Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee BY, Han JA, Im JS et al (2006) Senescence-associated β-galactosidase is lysosomal β-galactosidase. Aging Cell 5(2):187Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leckaczernik B, Moerman EJ, Shmookler Reis RJ et al (1997) Cellular and molecular biomarkers indicate precocious in vitro senescence in fibroblasts from SAMP6 mice. Evidence supporting a murine model of premature senescence and osteopenia. J Gerontol 52(6):B331Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gu Y, Wu Q, Zhu M et al (2011) Efficient pipeline configuration in distributed heterogeneous computing environments. Aging Cell 10(2):338Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chigira S, Sugita K, Kita K et al (2003) Increased expression of the Huntingtin interacting protein-1 gene in cells from Hutchinson Gilford Syndrome (Progeria) patients and aged donors. J Gerontol 58(10):B873Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cabrera S, Haskouri JE, Guillem C et al (2000) Generalised syntheses of ordered mesoporous oxides: the atrane route. Solid State Sci 2(4):405Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vallet-Regí M, Balas F, Arcos D (2007) Mesoporous materials for drug delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed 46(40):7548Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Auvray X, Petipas C, Anthore R et al (1995) X-ray diffraction study of the ordered lyotropic phases formed by sugar-based surfactants. Langmuir 11(2):433Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tang C, Zhou J, Qian Z et al (2017) A universal fluorometric assay strategy for glycosidases based on functional carbon quantum dots: β-galactosidase activity detection in vitro and in living cells. J Mater Chem B 5(10):1971Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen Y, Zhu C, Yang Z et al (2012) A new “turn-on” chemodosimeter for Hg2+: ICT fluorophore formation via Hg2+-induced carbaldehyde recovery from 1,3-dithiane. Chem Commun 48(42):5094Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zheng XT, Ananthanarayanan A, Luo KQ et al (2015) Glowing graphene quantum dots and carbon dots: properties, syntheses, and biological applications. Small 11(14):1620Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev 44(1):362Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kim EJ, Kumar R, Sharma A et al (2017) In vivo imaging of β-galactosidase stimulated activity in hepatocellular carcinoma using ligand-targeted fluorescent probe. Biomaterials 122:83Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Prost M, Hasserodt J (2014) “Double gating” – a concept for enzyme-responsive imaging probes aiming at high tissue specificity. Chem Commun 50(94):14896Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thorn-Seshold O, Vargas-Sanchez M, McKeon S et al (2012) A robust, high-sensitivity stealth probe for peptidases. Chem Commun 48(50):6253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anyao Bi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinchen Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tang Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuqi Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yi Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaohui Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wenbin Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Molecular Imaging Research Center, Central South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations