The Benefit of Direct-Acting Antiviral HCV Cure Therapies

  • Paul J. PockrosEmail author
Part of the Topics in Medicinal Chemistry book series (TMC, volume 32)


Although more than 600,000 patients in the USA have now been cured of HCV, the clinical benefits of cure have been seen primarily in patients with more advanced liver disease. This has resulted in a reduced incidence of liver cancers and reduced liver-related mortality. Benefits of cure in patients without cirrhosis have not been seen yet in systemic review, but are likely to be seen in the future years. There remain unresolved issues regarding patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who are cured of their HCV. It is not clear if fibrosis reverses after cure in everyone, if so by how much, and for how long patients with cirrhosis need to be monitored after cure. We have shown that 62% had improved liver stiffness measured by transient elastography (TE) that was consistent with regression of at least one stage of fibrosis over 1 year. Fifteen patients with matched liver biopsies prior to SVR underwent a biopsy after SVR. However, the post-SVR liver biopsies of only 4 patients showed F1–F2, while 11 patients still showed F3–F4, indicating that TE improvements are overstated when compared to histologic staging and that patients with cirrhosis before DAA therapy need to be monitored for hepatocellular carcinoma after cure.


Chronic hepatitis C Cirrhosis regression Hepatocellular carcinoma Morphometry Transient elastography 



Direct-acting antiviral therapy


Advanced fibrosis


Hepatocellular carcinoma


Hepatitis C virus




Sustained virologic response


Vibration-controlled transient elastography


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Paul J. Pockros has received research grants from Gilead, AbbVie, BMS, Merck, Conatus and has received a honorarium for speaking and consulting to PJP from Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, Conatus. He is Intercept Board of Directors member at Conatus.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Scripps institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its comparable standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study which was approved by the Scripps Human Subject committee IRB.


  1. 1.
    Jakobsen JC, Nielsen EE, Feinberg J et al (2017) Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD012143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwo PY, Shiffman ML, Bernstein DE (2018) The cochrane review conclusion for hepatitis C DAA therapies is wrong. Am J Gastroenterol 113(1):2–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flemming JA, Kim WR, Brosgart CL, Terrault NA (2017) Reduction in liver transplant wait-listing in the era of direct acting anti-viral therapy. Hepatology 65(3):804–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belli LS, Berenguer M, Cortesi PA et al (2016) Delisting of liver transplant candidates with chronic hepatitis C after viral eradication: a European study. J Hepatol 65:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim WR, Osinusi A, Mannalithara A et al (2018) Survival benefits of direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with decompensated hepatitis C cirrhosis. J Hepatol 68(4):S84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvaruso V, Pe'a S, Cacciola I, on behalf of resist-HCV et al (2018) Disease outcomes after DAA-induced SVR: data from the resist-HCV cohort. J Hepatol 68(4):S83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Meer AJ, Wedemeyer H, Feld JJ et al (2014) Life expectancy in patients with chronic HCV infection and cirrhosis compared with a general population. JAMA 312(18):1927–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee M-H, Yang P, Chen C et al (2012) Chronic hepatitis C virus infection increases mortality from hepatic and extrahepatic diseases: a community-based long-term prospective study. J Infect Dis 206:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allison RD, Tong X, Moorman AC et al (2015) Increased incidence of cancer and cancer-related mortality among persons with chronic hepatitis C infection, 2006-2010. J Hepatol 63(4):822–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch S et al (2017) Risk of HCC in HCV patients treated with direct acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology 153(4):996–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruix J, Sherman M (2011). Hepatology 53:1020–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis GL, Alter MJ, El-Serag H, Poynard T, Jennings LW (2010) Aging of hepatitis C (HCV)-infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology 138:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 41:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tapper EB, Cohen EB, Patel K, Bacon B, Gordon S, Lawitz E et al (2012) Levels of alanine aminotransferase confound use of transient elastography to diagnose fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:932–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castera L (2012) Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. Gastroenterology 142:1293–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh S, Facciorusso A, Loomba R, Falck-Ytter YT (2018) Magnitude and kinetics of decrease in liver stiffness after anti-viral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bachofner JA, Valli PV, Kröger A, Bergamin I, Künzler P, Baserga A et al (2017) DAA treatment of chronic hepatitis C results in rapid regression of transient elastography and fibrosis markers FIB-4 and APRI. Liver Int 37:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tada T, Kumada T, Toyoda H, Mizuno K, Sone Y, Kataoka S et al (2017) Improvement of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who received direct-acting antiviral therapy and achieved sustained virological response. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:1982–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knop V, Hoppe D, Welzel T, Vermehren J, Herrmann E, Vermehren A et al (2016) Regression of fibrosis and portal hypertension in HCV-associated cirrhosis and sustained virologic response after interferon-free antiviral therapy. J Viral Hepat 23:994–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dolmazashvili E, Abutidze A, Chkhartishvili N, Karchava M, Sharvadze L, Tsertsvadze T (2017) Regression of liver fibrosis over a 24-week period after completing direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving care within the national hepatitis C elimination program in Georgia: results of hepatology clinic HEPA experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 29:1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crissien AM, Minteer WB, Pan JJ, Waalen J, Frenette CT, Paul PJ (2015) Regression of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis measured by elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved sustained virologic response after treatment for HCV. Hepatology 62:264A–265AGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mallet V, Gilgenkrantz H, Serpaggi J, Verkarre V, Vallet-Pichard A, Fontaine H, Pol S (2008) Brief communication: the relationship of regression of cirrhosis to outcome in chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med 149:399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shiratori Y, Imazeki F, Moriyama M, Yano M, Arakawa Y, Yokosuka O et al (2000) Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 132:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tachi Y, Hirai T, Miyata A, Ohara K, Iida T, Ishizu Y et al (2015) Progressive fibrosis significantly correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with a sustained virological response. Hepatol Res 45:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    European Association for the Study of Liver (2015) EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C. J Hepatol 63:199–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    European Association for the Study of the Liver, Asociación Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Hígado (2015) EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 63:237–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lim JK, Flamm SL, Singh S, Falck-Ytter YT (2017) American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the role of elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 152:1544–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsochatzis EA, Gurusamy KS, Ntaoula S, Cholongitas E, Davidson BR, Burroughs AK (2011) Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. J Hepatol 54:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Poynard T, Vergniol J, Ngo Y, Foucher J, Munteanu M, Merrouche W et al (2014) Staging chronic hepatitis C in seven categories using fibrosis biomarker (FibroTest™) and transient elastography (FibroScan®). J Hepatol 60:706–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Batts KP, Ludwig J (1995) Chronic hepatitis. An update on terminology and reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 19:1409–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bedossa P, Poynard T (1996) An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 24:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pan JJ, Bao F, Du E, Skillin C, Frenette C, Waalen J, Alaparthi L, Goodman ZD, Pockros PJ (2018) Transient Elastography Overestimates Fibrosis Regression from Sustained Virologic Response to Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C. Hepatol Commun. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D’Ambrosio T, Aghemo A, Fraquelli M, Rumi MG, Donato MF, Paradis V et al (2013) The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan for cirrhosis is influenced by liver morphometry in HCV patients with a sustained virological response. J Hepatol 59:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Donato MF, Cristina R, Invernizz F, Colucci G, Fraquelli M, Maggioni M et al (2016) Paired liver biopsy, Fibrotest and Fibroscan before and after treatment with DAA in liver transplanted recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: diagnostic accuracy and concordance. Hepatology 64:134A–135AGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marino Z, Mensa L, Crespo G, Miquel R, Bruquera M, Perez-Del-Pulqar S et al (2014) Early periportal sinusoidal fibrosis is an accurate marker of accelerated HCV recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatology 61:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chevallier M, Guerret S, Chossegreos P, Gerard F, Grimaud JA (1994) A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparison with morphometric studies. Hepatology 20:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goodman ZD, Becker RL, Pockros PJ, Afdhal NH (2007) Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: evaluation by morphometric image analysis. Hepatology 45:886–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chan J, Gogela N, Zheng H, Lammert S, Ajayi T, Fricker Z et al (2018) Direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection results in liver stiffness regression over 12 months post-treatment. Dig Dis Sci 63:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology/HepatologyScripps Clinic La JollaUSA
  2. 2.The Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.The Scripps Translational Science InstituteLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations