Policies That Work for Sustainable Agriculture in Egypt

  • Moataz Elnemr
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 77)


Sustainable agriculture is economically, environmentally, and technically viable. Sustainable agriculture has different practices than traditional. Policies should be designed and planned to serve the goals of sustainable agriculture. Policies have to consider the local Egyptian environment and properties. There is a need for a framework lead to create a national policy for sustainable agriculture. Sustainable agriculture planning should be in participatory way not in sectorial level. Farmers are essential in planning for sustainability as they are the source of the research and extension needs, and they are mainly concerned by implementing sustainable agriculture practices. Policies will be created depending on three main considerations acting sustainable agriculture elements that need to be integrated: reforming external institutions and professional approach, supporting local groups for community action, and supporting resource-conserving technologies and practices. There is a need for a framework of policies to attract investments to the agricultural sector. Application of these policies requires suitable implementation mechanisms and pack of laws and regulations. Promising impacts are expected to increase production and reach self-sufficiency from applying sustainable agriculture practices and supportive policies.

This chapter suggests 22 policies that are suitable for the Egyptian agricultural sector to support transition to sustainable agriculture and self-reliance. It is recommended to monitor and evaluate the impacts of such policies to clarify the needs of modifications or replanning.


Agriculture Egypt Policies Sustainable agriculture Working policies 



Agricultural Bank of Egypt


Gross domestic products


Integrated pest management


Information technology


Egyptian pound = 0.06 United States Dollar


Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation


Nongovernmental organizations


Nominal rate of assistance


Science and Technology Development Fund in Egypt


  1. 1.
    Thompson M, Trisoglio A (1993) Managing the unmanageable. Paper presented at 2nd Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas Conference, Baltimore Maryland. 10–13 November 1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD (2016) Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2016, OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson K, Valenzuela E (2008) Estimates of global distortions to agricultural incentives, 1955 to 2007, World Bank, Washington, DC, October 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dewbre D, Godoy C, Sorescu S (2011) Agricultural Progress and Poverty Reduction: Synthesis Report, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 49, OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pretty JN (1999) Regenerating agriculture, policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. Earthscan, London, Sterrling, VAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christiaensen L, Demery L (2007) Down to earth agriculture and poverty reduction in Africa, The World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ligon E, Sadoulet E (2008) Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Agricultural Growth on the Distribution of Expenditures, Background paper for the World Development Report 2008, World BankGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holzman R, Jorgensen S (2001) Social risk management: a new conceptual framework for social protection, and beyond, International Tax and public Finance, No 8(4):529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arab Republic of Egypt (2009) Ministry of Agriculture & Land Reclamation. Sustainable Agricultural Development Strategy towards 2030 (SADS). Agricultural Research & Development Council. Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Agriculture & Land Reclamation. Oct. 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loayza N, Raddatz N (2006) The composition of growth matters for poverty alleviation, WPS-4 077, The World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Bank (1996) World Bank Discussion Paper No. 309Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joly P, Colinet L, Gaunand A, Lemarie S, Matt M (2016) Agricultural research impact assessment: issues, methods and challenges, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 98, OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    FAO (2009) FAO’s Information System on Water and Agriculture (online) Viewed 4th April 2014
  14. 14.
    Chaia A, Dalal A, Goland T, Gonzalez M, Morduch J, Schiff R (2009) Half the World is Unbanked. Financial Access Initiative Framing Note October 2009. Viewed at 8th September 2017
  15. 15.
    Asli, D, Leora K (2012) Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Fundex Database. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 6025. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World BankGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cervantes-Godoy D, Kimura S, Antón J (2013) Smallholder Risk Management in Developing Countries. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 61, OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    James L (1988) Principles of farm irrigation system design. Willey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    OECD (2013) Policy framework for investment in agriculture. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bunch R (1993) EPAGRI’s work in the state of Santa Catarina, Major New possibilities for resource-poor farmers. COSECHA, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupples P (1994) Farmer-driven research and the Project Agro-Forestier in Burkina Faso. In: Scoones I, Simpson J (eds) Beyond Farmer first. Intermediate Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah P (1994) A village managed extension systems in India: implications for policy and practice. In: Scoones I, Simpson J (eds) Beyond farmer first. IT, Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krishna A (1994) Large-scale government programs: Watershed development in Rajasthan, India. Paper for IIED New Horizons conference, Bangalore, India, Nov 1994. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    SWCB (1994) The impact of the catchment approach to soil and water conservation: a study of six catchments in Western, Rift Valley and Central Provinces, Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Development and Marketing in NairobiGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DIOP A (1992) Farmer-extensionist-research partnerships: Rodale international’s experience. Paper for joined IIED/IDS, Beyond Farmer First: Rural People’s knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice. Conference, 27–29 October 1992Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rands B (1992) Experiences in soil conservation work amongst pastoral people in North Eastern Mali. In: Tato K, Hurni H (eds) Soil conservation for survival. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    UNDP (1992) The benefits diversity. An incentive toward sustainable agriculture. United Nations Development Program, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Devavaram J (1994) Paraikulum Watershed, Tamil Nadu. Case study for IIED collaborative research project New Horizons: the economic and environmental benefits of participatory watershed development. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureDamietta UniversityDamiettaEgypt

Personalised recommendations