Skip to main content

Soil Aquifer Treatment System Design Equation for Organic Micropollutant Removal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwater in the Nile Delta

Abstract

Rapid population growth and mass migration from rural to urban centers have contributed to a new era of water sacristy, and a significant drop in per capita freshwater availability, resulting in the reuse of wastewater emerging as a viable alternative. The reuse of wastewater after treatment using the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) has recently gained popularity due to low operating/maintenance cost of the method. However, the presence of organic micropollutants (OMPs) may present a health risk if the SAT is not adequately designed to ensure required attenuation of the OMPs. An important aspect of the design of the SAT system is the large degree of natural variability in the OMP concentrations/loads in the wastewater and the uncertainty associated with the current methods for calculation of the removal efficiency of the SAT for the OMPs. This study presents a novel model for more accurate prediction of the removal efficiency of the SAT system for the OMPs and the fate of the OMPs trapped within the vadose zone. A large data set is compiled covering a broad range of aquifer conditions, and the SAT system parameters, including hydraulic loading rate and dry/wet ratio. This study suggests that removal of OMPs in SAT systems is most affected by biodegradation rate and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, in addition to dry to wet ratio. This conclusion is reached by the application of the developed prediction model using data sets from the case study SAT systems in Egypt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sattar AM, Dickerson JR, Chaudhry MH (2009) Wavelet-Galerkin solution to the water hammer equations. J Hydraul Eng 135(4):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foda A, Sattar A (2013) Morphological changes in river Nile at Bani-Sweif for probable flood flow releases. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fluvial hydraulics, RIVER FLOW 2014, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sattar AM (2013) Using gene expression programming to determine the impact of minerals on erosion resistance of selected cohesive Egyptian soils. Experimental and computational solutions of hydraulic problems, part of the series geoplanet: earth and planetary sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–387

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Sattar AM (2014) Predicting morphological changes ds new Naga-Hammadi barrage for extreme Nile flood flows: a Monte Carlo analysis. J Adv Res 5(1):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sattar AM (2014) Gene expression models for prediction of dam breach parameters. J Hydroinf 16(3):550–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sattar AM (2014) Gene expression models for the prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficients in transitional and turbulent pipe flow. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract ASCE 5(1):04013011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Hakeem M, Sattar AM (2015) An entrainment model for non-uniform sediment. Earth Surf Process Landf 4(9):1216–1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B (2015) Gene expression models for prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in streams. J Hydrol 524:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Najafzadeh M, Sattar AM (2015) Neuro-fuzzy GMDH approach to predict longitudinal dispersion in water networks. Water Resour Manag 29:2205–2219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0936-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B, McBean E (2016) Prediction of timing of watermain failure using gene expression models. Water Resour Manag 30(5):1635–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sattar AM (2016) Prediction of organic micropollutant removal in soil aquifer treatment system using GEP. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 21(9):04016027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sattar AM (2016) A probabilistic projection of the transient flow equations with random system parameters and internal boundary conditions. J Hydraul Res 54(3):342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1140682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sattar AM (2016) Closure to “gene expression models for the prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficients in transitional and turbulent pipe flow” by Ahmed M. A. Sattar. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 7(4):07016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson J, Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B, Richard W (2016) Event based total suspended sediment particle size distribution model. J Hydrol 536:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabouri F, Gharabaghi B, Sattar AM, Thompson AM (2016) Event-based stormwater management pond runoff temperature model. J Hydrol 540:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atieh M, Taylor G, Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B (2017) Prediction of flow duration curves for ungauged basins. J Hydrol 545:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gharabaghi B, Sattar AM (2017) Empirical models for longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.022

  18. Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B, Sabouri F, Thompson AM (2017) Urban stormwater thermal gene expression models for protection of sensitive receiving streams. Hydrol Process 31(13):2330–2348. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Hakeem M, Sattar AM (2017) Explicit solution for the specific flow depths in partially filled pipes. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 8(4):06017004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sattar AM, Ertuğrul ÖF, Gharabaghi B, McBean EA (2017) Extreme learning machine model for water network management. Neural Comput Applic, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2987-7DO

  21. Sattar AM, Beltagy M (2016) Stochastic solution to the water hammer equations using polynomial chaos expansion with random boundary and initial conditions. J Hydraul Eng 143(2):04016078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Drillia P, Stamatelatou K, Lyberatos G (2005) Fate and mobility of pharmaceuticals in solid matrices. Chemosphere 60(8):1034–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Wu L, Chang AC (2009) Degradation and adsorption of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in agricultural soils. Chemosphere 77(10):1299–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maeng SK, Sharma SK, Amy G (2011) Framework for assessment of organic micropollutant removals during managed aquifer recharge and recovery. Riverbank filtration for water security in desert countries. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu Y, Liu Y, Wu L (2013) Sorption and degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(6):4261–4267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin C, Shacahr Y, Banin A (2004) Heavy metal retention and partitioning in a large-scale soil-aquifer treatment (SAT) system used for wastewater reclamation. Chemosphere 57(9):1047–1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fox P, Aboshanp W, Alsamadi B (2005) Analysis of soils to demonstrate sustained organic carbon removal during soil aquifer treatment. J Environ Qual 34(1):156–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Amy G, Drewes J (2007) Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) as a natural and sustainable wastewater reclamation/reuse technology: fate of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) and trace organic compounds. Environ Monit Assess 129:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma SK, Harun CM, Amy G (2008) Framework for assessment of performance of soil aquifer treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 57:941–946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Caballero MH (2010) Soil aquifer treatment as pre-treatment for organic micropollutant removal during membrane filtration. MSc thesis, MWI 2019-5, UNESCO-IHE, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abel CDT, Sharma SK, Malolo YN, Maeng SK, Kennedy MD, Amy GL (2012) Attenuation of bulk organic matter, nutrients (N and P), and pathogen indicators during soil passage: effect of temperature and redox conditions in simulated soil aquifer treatment (SAT). Water Air Soil Pollut 223:5205–5220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Onesios-Barry KM, Berry D, Proescher JB, Sivakumar IA, Bouwer EJ (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products during water recycling: microbial community structure and effects of substrate concentration. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(8):2440–2450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suzuki R, Kameda I, Takabe Y, Nishimura F, Itoh S (2015) Removal of dissolved organic matter and disinfection by-products formation potential in the upper layer during soil aquifer treatment. J Water Environ Technol 13(2):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Abokifa A (2013) Modeling soil aquifer treatment processes during managed aquifer recharge considering soil heterogeneity and parameter uncertainty. MSc thesis, Department of Irrigation and Hydraulics, Cairo University, Giza

    Google Scholar 

  36. Regional Institute for Groundwater Modeling (RIGW) (2006) Evaluation of different uses for the groundwater in Sadat city. Technical Report No. 3, Research Institute for Groundwater

    Google Scholar 

  37. El Arabi N, Mohamed A, Dawoud A (2012) Groundwater aquifer recharge with treated wastewater in Egypt: technical, environmental, economical and regulatory considerations. Desalin Water Treat 47:266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fadlelmawal A, Halem M, Vissers M (1999) Preliminary plans for artificial recharge with reclaimed wastewater in Egypt. In: Proceedings, 9th biennial symposium on the artificial recharge of groundwater, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  39. Abu Zeid K (2009) Assessment of groundwater potential in Alexandria governorate. Report submitted to sixth framework programme, CEDARE International

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmed MA, Abdel Samie SG, El-Maghrabi HM (2011) Recharge and contamination sources of shallow and deep groundwater of pleistocene aquifer in El-Sadat industrial city: isotope and hydrochemical approaches. Environ Earth Sci 62:751–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Safadoust A, Amiri Khaboushan E, Mahboubi AA, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghi MR, Ahrens B, Hassanpour Y (2016) Comparison of three models describing bromide transport as affected by different soil structure types. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(5):674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2015.1074184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gharabaghi B, Safadoust A, Mahboubi AA, Mosaddeghi MR, Unc A, Ahrens B, Sayyad G (2015) Temperature effect on the transport of bromide and E. coli NAR in saturated soils. J Hydrol 522:418–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Safadoost A, Yousefi G, Mahboubi A, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghi M, Yousefi G, Safadoust A, Mahboubi AA, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghi MR, Ahrens B, Shirani H (2014) Bromide and lithium transport in soils under long-term cultivation of alfalfa and wheat. Agric Ecosyst Environ 188:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Safadoust A, Mahboubi AA, Mossaddeghi MR, Gharabaghi B, Unce A, Voroney P, Heydari A (2012) Effect of regenerated soil structure on unsaturated transport of Escherichia coli and bromide. J Hydrol 430–431:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Safadoust A, Mahboubi AA, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghic MR, Voroney P, Unce A, Khodakaramian G (2012) Significance of physical weathering of two-texturally different soils for the saturated transport of E. coli and bromide. J Environ Manag 107:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Abdel Sattar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abdel Sattar, A.M., Bonakdari, H., Negm, A., Gharabaghi, B., Elhakeem, M. (2018). Soil Aquifer Treatment System Design Equation for Organic Micropollutant Removal. In: Negm, A. (eds) Groundwater in the Nile Delta . The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 73. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_136

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics