Advertisement

SALTMED Model and Its Application on Field Crops, Different Water and Field Management and Under Current and Future Climate Change

  • R. RagabEmail author
  • R. Choukr-Allah
  • A. Nghira
  • A. Hirich
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 53)

Abstract

Models can be very useful tools in agriculture water management. They could help in irrigation scheduling and crop water requirement estimation and to predict yields and soil salinization. SALTMED model is a generic model that can be used for a variety of irrigation systems, soil types, crops and trees, water application strategies and different water qualities. The early version was successfully tested against field experimental data. The current version, SALTMED 2015, includes additional sub-models, crop growth according to heat units/degree days, crop rotations, nitrogen dynamics, soil temperature, dry matter and yield, subsurface irrigation, deficit irrigation including the Partial Root Drying, PRD, drainage flow to tile or open drains systems, presence of shallow groundwater, evapotranspiration (ET) using Penman–Monteith equation, with different options to obtain the canopy conductance. The current version allows up to 20 fields or treatments to run simultaneously.

The model was applied on field experiments in Agadir in the Souss-Massa river basin. These experiments included several crops, such as quinoa, sweetcorn and chickpea; different water qualities, such as saline water, treated waste water and fresh water; different irrigation strategies, such as deficit irrigation (applying less water than the total crop water requirement) and applied water stress during certain growth stages. The model was successful in predicting the soil moisture, yield and dry matter for all the crops under different water qualities and all the water application strategies. The results showed that quinoa is the most drought and salt tolerant cereal crop. The results also showed the possibility of significant fresh water saving when using treated waste water and applying moderate water deficit/stress especially during the non-sensitive growth stages.

The SALTMED model, for three growing seasons, supplied “baseline data” for sweetcorn. The SALTMED model was run in forecasting mode to obtain future projections of crop ET and crop productivity under changing climate. The results suggested that, with increasing temperature, the crop ET is expected to increase by 15% while crop water requirement is expected to decrease by 13%, due to the shortening growth season of corn. The results also show that the crop harvest is expected to be 20 days earlier. Crop productivity in terms of dry matter and yield could exhibit a reduction of 2.5% towards the end of the twenty-first century. This study was applied on corn but it is likely that a similar trend could be found for other crops grown in the Souss region. These results indicate that climate change could have a negative impact on water availability in this water poor region and subsequently may pose a serious threat to the region’s food security.

Keywords

Agadir Agricultural water management Climate change impact on yield and crop water requirement Modelling SALTMED model Souss-Massa basin Yield 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this chapter is based on the results of the EU funded project SWUP-MED, Sustainable Water Use securing food Production in dry areas of the Mediterranean (KBBE-2008-212337), SALTMED: A systems approach to a sustainable increase in irrigated vegetable crop production in salinity prone areas of the Mediterranean region. EU funded project. Contract No. ERB351PL972469, SAFIR: Safe and High Quality Food Production using Low Quality Waters and improved Irrigation Systems and Management. EU funded project. Contract No. Food-CT-2005-023168 and Water 4 crops “Integrating bio-treated wastewater with enhanced water use efficiency to support the Green Economy in EU and India” Grant agreement no: 11933. THEME [KBBE.2012.3.5-03] EU KBBE 2012.3.5-03.

References

  1. 1.
    Choukr-Allah R (2012) Perspectives of wastewater reuse in the Mediterranean region. In: Choukr-Allah R, Ragab R, Rodriguez-Clemente R (eds) Integrated water resources management in the Mediterranean region. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 125–137. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4756-2_8
  2. 2.
    Hamdy A, Ragab R, Scarascia ME (2003) Coping with water scarcity: water saving and increasing water productivity. J Irrig Drain 52:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malash NM, Flowers TJ, Ragab R (2008) Effect of irrigation methods, management and salinity of irrigation water on tomato yield, soil moisture and salinity distribution. Irrig Sci 26:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ragab R (2002) A holistic generic integrated approach for irrigation, crop and field management: the SALTMED model. Environ Model Software 17:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ragab R (1997) Constraints and applicability of irrigation scheduling under limited water resources, variable rainfall and saline conditions. Thematic paper (Theme III), ICID-FAO Workshop, Rome, Sept. 12–13, 1995. In: Smith M, Pereira LS, Berengena J, Itier B, Goussard J, Ragab R, Tollefson L, van Hofwegen P (eds) Irrigation scheduling from theory to practice. FAO-ICID Special Publication. Water Reports No. 8. FAO, Rome, pp 149–165Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ragab R (1998) The use of saline/brackish water for irrigation: possibilities and constraints. In Ragab R, Pearce G (eds) Proceedings of an international workshop on the use of Saline and Brackish water for irrigation- implication for the management of irrigation, drainage and crops, 12–41. Bali, Indonesia, July 23–24, 1998. Part of the 49th Annual ICID ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ragab R (2004) Proceedings of the International workshop on “Management of poor quality water for irrigation: Institutional, health and environmental aspects”, Moscow 9–10, 2004. International Commission on Irrigation and drainage, ICID. 276 pp. Available at http://www.ICID.org and at http://www.ceh-wallingford.ac.uk/research/cairoworkshop
  8. 8.
    Ragab R (2015) Integrated management tool for water, crop, soil and N‐fertilizers: the SALTMED model. Irrig Drain 64:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ragab R (ed) (2005) Advances in integrated management of fresh and saline water for sustainable crop production: modelling and practical solutions. Int J Agric Water Manage (Special Issue) 78(1–2):1–164. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ragab R (2010) SALTMED Model as an integrated management tool for water, crop, soil and fertilizers. In: Gheyi, HR, Dias NS, de Lacerda CF (eds) Manejo da salinidade na agricultura: Estudos básicos e aplicados. Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Salinidade, Fortaleza, Brazil, pp 320–336Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen GR, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment. In: XIXth symposia of the society for experimental biology. In the state and movement of water in living organisms. University Press, Swansea, pp 205–234Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cardon EG, Letey J (1992) Plant water uptake terms evaluated for soil water and solute movement models. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1876–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhoades JD, Kandiah A, Mashali AM (1992) The use of saline waters for crop production. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 48. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eckersten H, Jansson P-E (1991) Modelling water flow, nitrogen uptake and production for wheat. Fertil Res 27:313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hillel D (1977) In: Hillel D (ed) Computer simulation of soil-water dynamics; a compendium of recent work. IDRC, Ottawa, 214 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bresler E (1975) Two-dimensional transport of solute during non-steady infiltration for a trickle source. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:604–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fletcher Armstrong C, Wilson TV (1983) Computer model for moisture distribution in stratified soils under tickle source. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 26:1704–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ragab R, Feyen J, Hillel D (1984) Simulating two-dimensional infiltration into sand from a trickle line source using the matric flux potential concept. Soil Sci 137:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang S, Kim S, Oh S, Lee D (2000) Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of soil temperature based on topography, surface cover and air temperature. For Ecol Manage 136:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng D, Hunt J, Running SW (1993) A daily soil temperature model based on air temperature and precipitation for continental applications. Climate Res 2:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnsson H, Bergstrom L, Jansson P-E (1987) Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 18:333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hooghoudt SB (1940) General consideration of the problem of field drainage by parallel drains, ditches, watercourses, and channels. Publ. No. 7 in the series Contribution to the knowledge of some physical parameters of the soil (titles translated from Dutch). Bodemkundig Instituut, Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wesseling J (1973) Subsurface flow into drains. Drainage Principles and Applications Vol. II: Theories of Field Drainage and Watershed Runoff. 2–56. Publ. 16. ILRI, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jarvis PG (1976) The iterepretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc B 273:593–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Körner C (1994) Leaf diffusive conductance in the major vegetative types of the globe. In: Schulze ED, Calwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis, vol 100, Ecol Stud. Springer, Berlin, pp 463–490Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tardieu F, Zhang J, Gowing DJG (1993) Stomatal control by both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for droughted or ABA-fed fieldgrown maize. Plant Cell Environ 16:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loague K, Green RW (1991) Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol 7:51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Ragab
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Choukr-Allah
    • 2
  • A. Nghira
    • 2
  • A. Hirich
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, CEHWallingfordUK
  2. 2.Agronomic and Veterinary Medicine Hassan II Institute, CHA AgadirAit MelloulMorocco

Personalised recommendations