Nanoparticles in European Cities and Associated Health Impacts

Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 26)

Abstract

Atmospheric nanoparticles are a pollutant currently unregulated through ambient air quality standards. The aim of this chapter is to assess the environmental and health impacts of atmospheric nanoparticles in European environments. This chapter begins with the conventional information on the origin of atmospheric nanoparticles, followed by their physical and chemical characteristics. A brief overview of recently published review articles on this topic is then presented to guide those readers interested in exploring any specific aspect of nanoparticles in greater detail. A further section reports a summary of recently published studies on atmospheric nanoparticles in European cities. This covers a total of about 45 sampling locations in 30 different cities within 15 European countries for quantifying levels of roadside and urban background particle number concentrations (PNCs). Average PNCs at the reviewed roadside and urban background sites were found to be 3.82 ± 3.25 × 104 and 1.63 ± 0.82 × 104 cm−3, respectively, giving a roadside to background PNC ratio of ~2.4. Engineered nanoparticles are one of the key emerging categories of airborne nanoparticles, especially for the indoor environments. Their ambient concentrations may increase in future due to widespread use of nanotechnology integrated products. Evaluation of their sources and probable impacts on air quality and human health are briefly discussed in the following section. Respiratory deposition doses received by the public exposed to roadside PNCs in numerous European locations are then estimated. These were found to be in the 1.17–7.56 × 1010 h−1 range over the studied roadside European locations. The following section discusses the potential framework for airborne nanoparticle regulations in Europe and, in addition, the existing control measures to limit nanoparticle emissions at source. The chapter finally concludes with a synthesis of the topic areas covered and highlights important areas for further work.

Keywords

Aerosol number and size distributions Engineered nanoparticles European environment Exposure–response doses Ultrafine particles 

References

  1. 1.
    Donaldson K, Tran L, Albert Jimenez LA, Duffin R, Newby DE, Mills N, MacNee W, Stone V (2005) Combustion-derived nanoparticles: a review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Particle Fibre Toxicol 5(6):553–560Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Britter R (2010) A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls. Atmos Environ 44:5035–5052Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morawska L, Wang H, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne ER, Johnson G, Cheung HC, Ling X, He C (2009) JEM spotlight: environmental monitoring of airborne nanoparticles. J Environ Monit 11:1758–1773Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar P, Fennell P, Robins A (2010) Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities. J Nanopart Res 12:1523–1530Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar P, Robins A, ApSimon H (2010) Nanoparticle emissions from biofuelled vehicles – their characteristics and impact on the number-based regulation of atmospheric particles. Atmos Sci Lett 11:327–331Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vardoulakis S, Fisher BEA, Gonzalez-Flesca N, Pericleous K (2002) Model sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using roadside air quality measurements. Atmos Environ 36:2121–2134Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vardoulakis S, Fisher BRA, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca N (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37:155–182Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vardoulakis S, Valiantis M, Milner J, ApSimon H (2007) Operational air pollution modelling in the UK – street canyon applications and challenges. Atmos Environ 41:4622–4637Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buseck PR, Adachi K (2008) Nanoparticles in the atmosphere. Elements 4:389–394Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flagan RC (1998) History of electrical aerosol measurements. Aerosol Sci Technol 28:301–380Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McMurry PH (2000) The history of condensation nucleus counters. Aerosol Sci Technol 33:297–322Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McMurry PH (2000) A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements. Atmos Environ 34:1959–1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simonet BM, Valcárcel M (2009) Monitoring nanoparticles in the environment. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:17–21Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biswas P, Wu C-Y (2005) Nanoparticle and the environment. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 55:708–746Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–22Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR (2008) Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ 400:396–414Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seigneur C (2009) Current understanding of ultra fine particulate matter emitted from mobile sources. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59:3–17Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A, Rodríguez S, Putaud JP, Van Dingenen R (2009) Source apportionment of urban fine and ultra fine particle number concentration in a Western Mediterranean city. Atmos Environ 43:4407–4415Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrison RM, Beddows DCS, Dall’Osto M (2011) PMF analysis of wide-range particle size spectra collected on a major highway. Environ Sci Technol 45:5522–5528Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holmes NS, Morawska L (2006) A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmos Environ 40:5902–5928Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morawska L, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne ER, Keogh DU, Ling X (2008) Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmos Environ 42:8113–8138Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morawska L (2010) Airborne engineered nanoparticles: are they a health problem? Air Qual Climate Change 44:18–20Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morawska L, Jayaratne ER, Knibbs LD, Megatmokhtar M (2010) Regulations and policy measures related to the reduction of ambient particulate matter. In: Zereini F, Wiseman C (eds) Urban particulate matter: origins, chemistry, fate and health impacts. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knibbs LD, Cole-Hunter T, Morawska L (2011) A review of commuter exposure to ultrafine particles and its health effects. Atmos Environ 45:2611–2622Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carpentieri M, Kumar P, Robins A (2011) An overview of experimental results and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles in the wake of moving vehicles. Environ Pollut 159:685–693Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumar P, Ketzel M, Vardoulakis S, Pirjola L, Britter R (2011) Dynamics and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles from road traffic in the urban atmospheric environment – a review. J Aerosol Sci 42:580–603Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Quincey P (2011) Technical challenges in tackling regulatory concerns for urban atmospheric nanoparticles. Particuology 9:566–571Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar P (2011) Footprints of airborne ultrafine particles on urban air quality and public health. J Civ Environ Eng 1:e101. doi:10.4172/jcee.1000e101 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar P, Mulheron M, Fisher B, Harrison RM (2012) New Directions: Airborne ultrafine particle dust from building activities – a source in need of quantification. Atmos Environ, In Press, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.028
  30. 30.
    Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behaviour and measurement of airborne particles. Wiley, London, p 483Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Charron A, Harrison RM (2003) Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the road side atmosphere. Atmos Environ 37:4109–4119Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kittelson DB, Watts WF, Johnson JP (2006) On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols – Part 1: summary of diesel engine results. J Aerosol Sci 37:913–930Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2006) Atmospheric chemistry and physics, from air pollution to climate change. Wiley, New York, p 1203Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kulmala M, Vehkamaki H, Petaja T, Dal Maso M, Lauri A, Kerminen V-M, Birmili W, McMurry PH (2004) Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations. J Aerosol Sci 35:143–176Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lingard JJN, Agus EL, Young DT, Andrews GE, Tomlin AS (2006) Observations of urban airborne particle number concentrations during rush-hour conditions: analysis of the number based size distributions and modal parameters. J Environ Monit 8:1203–1218Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kittelson DB, Watts WF, Johnson JP, Lawson DR (2006) On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosol – Part 2: summary of spark ignition engine results. J Aerosol Sci 37:931–949Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Graskow BR, Kittelson DB, Abdul-Khaleek IS, Ahmadi MR, Morris JE (1998) Characterization of exhaust particulate emissions from a spark ignition engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 980528Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kittelson DB (1998) Engines and nano-particles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 29:575–588Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Anastasio C, Martin ST (2001) Atmospheric nanoparticles. In: Banfield JF, Navrotsky A (eds) Nanoparticles and the environment, vol 44. Mineralogical Society of America, pp 293–349Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dahl A, Gharibi A, Swietlicki E, Gudmundsson A, Bohgard M, Ljungman A, Blomqvist G, Gustafsson M (2006) Traffic-generated emissions of ultrafine particles from pavement-tire interface. Atmos Environ 40:1314–1323Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patra A, Colvile R, Arnold S, Bowen E, Shallcross D, Martin D, Price C, Robins A (2008) On street observations of particulate matter movement and dispersion due to traffic on an urban road. Atmos Environ 42:3911–3926Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vakeva M, Hameri K, Kulmala M, Lahdes R, Ruuskanen J, Laitinen T (1999) Street level versus rooftop concentrations of submicron aerosol particles and gaseous pollutants in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 33:1385–1397Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Holmes N (2007) A review of particle formation events and growth in the atmosphere in the various environments and discussion of mechanistic implications. Atmos Environ 41:2183–2201Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kumar P, Fennell P, Hayhurst A, Britter RE (2009) Street versus rooftop level concentrations of fine particles in a Cambridge street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:3–18Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alam A, Shi JP, Harrison RM (2003) Observations of new particle formation in urban air. J Geophys Res 108:4093–4107Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    O’Dowd CD, Aalto P, Hameri K, Kulmala M, Hoffmann T (2002) Aerosol formation: atmospheric particles from organic vapours. Nature 416:497–498Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    O’Dowd C, Jimenez JL, Bahreinl R, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH, Hamerl D, Pirjola L, Kulmala M, Jennings SG, Hoffmann T (2002) Marine aerosol formation from biogenic iodine emissions. Nature 417:632Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heintzenberg J, Wehner B, Birmili W (2007) ‘How to find bananas in the atmospheric aerosol’: new approach for analyzing atmospheric nucleation and growth events. Tellus 59B:273–282Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wise ME, Semeniuk TA, Bruintjes R, Martin ST, Russell LM, Buseck PR (2007) Hygroscopic behaviour of NaCl-bearing natural aerosol particles using environmental transmission electron microscopy. J Geophys Res 112:D10224. doi:10210.11029/12006JD007678Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ketzel M, Wahlin P, Kristensson A, Swietlicki E, Berkowicz R, Nielsen OJ, Palmgren F (2003) Particle size distribution and particle mass measurements at urban, near-city and rural level in the Copenhagen area and Southern Sweden. Atmos Chem Phys 4:281–292Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rimnácová D, Zdímal V, Schwarz J, Smolík J, Rimnác M (2011) Atmospheric aerosols in suburb of Prague: the dynamics of particle size distributions. Atmos Res 101:539–552Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aitken RJ, Creeley KS, Tran CL (2004) Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review. Research Report 274 Institute of Occupational Medicine for the Health and Safety Executive 2004, p 113Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dawson NG (2008) Sweating the small stuff: environmental risk and nanotechnology. Bioscience 58:690Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roco M (2005) International Perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005. J Nanopart Res 7:707–712Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Peralta-Videa JR, Zhao L, Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008–2010. J Hazard Mater 186:1–15Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Helland A, Wick P, Koehler A, Schmid K, Som C (2007) Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environ Health Perspect 115:1125–1131Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brouwer D (2010) Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicology 269:120–127Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fujitani Y, Kobayashi T, Arashidani K, Kunugita N, Suemura K (2008) Measurement of the physical properties of aerosols in a fullerene factory for inhalation exposure assessment. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:380–389Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Donaldson K, Tran CL (2004) An introduction to the short-term toxicology of respirable industrial fibres. Mutat Res/Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 553:5–9Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Xia T, Li N, Nel AE (2009) Potential health impact of nanoparticles. Annu Rev Public Health 30:137–150Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Choi J-Y, Ramachandran G, Kandlikar M (2009) The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environ Sci Technol 43:3030–3034Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schmid G, Baumle M, Geerkens M, Helm I, Osemann C, Sawitowski T (1999) Current and future applications of nanoclusters. Chem Eng Soc Rev 28:179–185Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    BSI (2007) Nanotechnologies – PD 6699-2:2007. Part 2: guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials. British Standard Institute, p 32. , ISBN 978 0 580 60832 2Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH, So KP, Lee YH, Bae GN, Lee S-B, Ji JH, Cho MH, Yu IJ (2008) Monitoring multi-walled nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol 20:741–749Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yeganeh B, Kull CM, Hull MS, Marr LC (2008) Characterisation of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 42:4600–4606Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Muller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Handy RD, Henry TB, Scown TM, Johnston BD, Tyler CR (2008) Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish-amechanistic analysis. Ecotoxicology 17:396–409Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Handy RD, von der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M (2008) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:287–314Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Valant J, Drobne D, Sepcic K, Jemec A, Kogej K, Kostanjsek R (2009) Hazardous potential of manufactured nanoparticles identified by in vivo assay. J Hazard Mater 171:160–165Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manag 29:2587–2595Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    AQEG (1999) Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter in the United Kingdom. Report of the Airborne Particles Expert Group, p 158. http://www.environment.detr.gov.uk/airq/
  72. 72.
    Baldauf R, Thoma E, Hays M, Shores R, Kinsey J, Gullett B, Kimbrough SJB (2008) Traffic and meteorological impacts on near-road air quality: summary of methods and trends from the Raleigh near-road study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 58:865–878Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chan YC, Simpson RW, Mctainsh GH, Vowles PD, Cohen DD, Bailey GM (1999) Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane (Australia) by receptor modelling. Atmos Environ 33:3251–3268Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fraser MP, Yue ZW, Buzcu B (2003) Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, TX, using organic molecular markers. Atmos Environ 37:2117–2123Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Harrison RM, ApSimon H, Clarke AG, Dewent RG, Fisher B, Hickman J, Mark D, Murrells T, McAughey J, Pooley F, Richards R, Stedman J, Vawda Y, Williams M, Coster S, Mayland R, Prosser H, Hall I, McMohan N (1999) Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter in the United Kingdom. Technical Report, Department of Environment, Transport & the Regions, the Welsh Office, the Scottish Office & the Department of the Environment (North Ireland)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Schauer JJ, Hildermann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (1996) Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos Environ 30:3837–3855Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wåhlin P, Palmgren F, Van Dingenen R (2001) Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relatioship of traffic. Atmos Environ 35:S63–S69Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Johansson C, Norman M, Gidhagen L (2007) Spatial & temporal variations of PM10 and particle number concentrations in urban air. Environ Monit Assess 127:477–487Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kumar P, Fennell P, Langley D, Britter R (2008) Pseudo-simultaneous measurements for the vertical variation of coarse, fine and ultra fine particles in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 42:4304–4319Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kumar P, Fennell P, Symonds J, Britter R (2008) Treatment of losses of ultrafine aerosol particles in long sampling tubes during ambient measurements. Atmos Environ 42:8819–8826Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kumar P, Robins A, Britter R (2008) Fast response measurements for the dispersion of nanoparticles in a vehicle wake and a street canyon. Atmos Environ 43:6110–6118Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kumar P, Fennell P, Britter R (2008) Effect of wind direction and speed on the dispersion of nucleation and accumulation mode particles in an urban street canyon. Sci Total Environ 402:82–94Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Mejla JF, Morawska L (2009) An investigation of nucleation events in a coastal urban environment in the Southern Hemisphere. Atmos Chem Phys 9:7877–7888Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shi JP, Evans DE, Khan AA, Harrison RM (2001) Sources and concentration of nanoparticles (<10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere. Atmos Environ 35:1193–1202Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wehner B, Wiedensohler A (2003) Long term measurements of submicrometer urban aerosols: statistical analysis for correlations with meteorological conditions and trace gases. Atmos Chem Phys 3:867–879Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Li Y, Suriyawong A, Daukoru M, Zhuang Y, Biswas P (2009) Measurement and capture of fine and ultrafine particles from a pilot-scale pulverized coal combustor with an electrostatic precipitator. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59:553–559Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hu S, Fruin S, Kozawa K, Mara S, Winer AM, Paulson SE (2009) Aircraft emission impacts in a neighborhood adjacent to a General Aviation Airport in Southern California. Environ Sci Technol 43:8039–8045Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mazaheri M, Johnson GR, Morawska L (2008) Particle and gaseous emissions from commercial aircraft at each stage of the landing and takeoff cycle. Environ Sci Technol 43:441–446Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Saxe H, Larsen T (2004) Air pollution from ships in three Danish ports. Atmos Environ 38:4057–4067Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hansen D, Blahout B, Benner D, Popp W (2008) Environmental sampling of particulate matter and fungal spores during demolition of a building on a hospital area. J Hosp Infect 70:259–264Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kumar P, Mulheron M, Som C (2012) Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes. J Nanopart Res 14, 771, doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0771-2
  92. 92.
    Buonanno G, Morawska L, Stabile L, Viola A (2010) Exposure to particle number, surface area and PM concentrations in pizzerias. Atmos Environ 44:3963–3969Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Reche C, Querol X, Alastuey A, Viana M, Pey J, Moreno T, Rodríguez S, González Y, Fernández-Camacho R, de la Rosa J, Dall’Osto M, Prévôt ASH, Hueglin C, Harrison RM, Quincey P (2011) New considerations for PM, Black Carbon and particle number concentration for air quality monitoring across different European cities. Atmos Chem Phys 11:6207–6227Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wåhlin P (2009) Measured reduction of kerbside ultrafine particle number concentrations in Copenhagen. Atmos Environ 43:3645–3647Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Harrison RM, Jones AM (2005) Multisite study of particle number concentrations in urban air. Environ Sci Technol 29:6063–6070Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Dall’Osto M, Thorpe A, Beddows DCS, Harrison RM, Barlow JF, Dunbar T, Williams PI, Coe H (2011) Remarkable dynamics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 11:6623–6637Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Atkinson RW, Fuller GW, Anderson HR, Harrison RM, Armstrong B (2010) Urban ambient particle metrics and health: a time-series analysis. Epidemiology 21:501–511Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Harrison RM, Giorio C, Beddows DC, Dall’Osto M (2010) Size distribution of air-borne particles controls outcomes of epidemiological studies. Sci Total Environ 409:289–293Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Morawska L, Johnson G, Ristovski ZD, Agranovski V (1999) Relation between particle mass and number for submicrometer airborne particles. Atmos Environ 33:1983–1990Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Int Panis L, de Geus B, Vandenbulcke G, Willems H, Degraeuwe B, Bleux N, Mishra V, Thomas I, Meeusen R (2010) Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: a comparison of cyclists and car passengers. Atmos Environ 44:2263–2270Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    ICRP (1994) ICRP Publication 66: human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a task group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, pp 1–482Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    EC (2008) Directive on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe (Directive 2008/50/EC). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:152:0001:0044:EN:PDF. Accessed on 20 March 2010
  104. 104.
    Li XL, Wang JS, Tu XD, Liu W, Huang L (2007) Vertical variations of particle number concentration and size distribution in a street canyon in Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ 378:306–316Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Longley ID, Gallagher MW, Dorsey JR, Flynn M, Allan JD, Alfarra D, Inglish D (2003) A case study of aerosol (4.6 nm < Dp < 10 μm) number and mass size distribution measurements in a busy street canyon in Manchester, UK. Atmos Environ 37:1563–1571Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Agus EL, Young DT, Lingard JJN, Smalley RJ, Tate EJ, Goodman PS, Tomlin AS (2007) Factors influencing particle number concentrations, size distributions and modal parameters at a roof-level and roadside site in Leicester, UK. Sci Total Environ 386:65–82Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Shi PJ, Khan AA, Harrison RM (1999) Measurements of ultra fine particle concentration and size distribution in the urban atmosphere. Sci Total Environ 235:51–64Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Can A, Rademaker M, Van Renterghem T, Mishra V, Van Poppel M, Touhafi A, Theunis J, De Baets B, Botteldooren D (2011) Correlation analysis of noise and ultrafine particle counts in a street canyon. Sci Total Environ 409:564–572Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Weber S (2009) Spatio-temporal covariation of urban particle number concentration and ambient noise. Atmos Environ 43:5518–5525Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Voigtlander J, Tuch T, Birmili W, Wiedensohler A (2006) Correlation between traffic density and particle size distribution in a street canyon and the dependence on wind direction. Atmos Chem Phys 6:4275–4286Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Puustinen A, Hämeri K, Pekkanen J, Kulmala M, de Hartog J, Meliefste K, ten Brink H, Kos G, Katsouyanni K, Karakatsani A, Kotronarou A, Kavouras I, Meddings C, Thomas S, Harrison R, Ayres JG, van der Zee S, Hoek G (2007) Spatial variation of particle number and mass over four European cities. Atmos Environ 41:6622–6636Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Boogaard H, Montagne DR, Brandenburg AP, Meliefste K, Hoek G (2010) Comparison of short-term exposure to particle number, PM10 and soot concentrations on three (sub) urban locations. Sci Total Environ 408:4403–4411Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Paatero P, Aalto P, Picciotto S, Bellander T, Castano G, Cattani G, Cyrys J, Koster M (2005) Estimating time series of aerosol particle number concentrations in the five HEAPSS cities on the basis of measured air pollution and meteorological variables. Atmos Environ 39:2261–2273Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Roth E, Kehrli D, Bonnot K, Trouve G (2008) Size distribution of fine and ultrafine particles in the city of Strasbourg: correlation between number of particles and concentrations of NOx and SO2 gases and some soluble ions concentration determination. J Environ Manag 86:282–290Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Ondrácek J, Schwarz J, Zdímal V, Andelová L, Vodicka P, Bízek V, Tsai CJ, Chen SC, Smolík J (2011) Contribution of the road traffic to air pollution in the Prague city (busy speedway and suburban crossroads). Atmos Environ 45:5090–5100Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Gomiscek B, Hauck H, Stopper S, Preining O (2004) Spatial and temporal variations of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP–project. Atmos Environ 38:3917–3934Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Morawska L, Thomas S, Hofmann W, Ristovski Z, Jamriskaa M, Rettenmoser T, Kagerer S (2004) Exploratory cross-sectional investigations on ambient submicrometer particles in Salzburg, Austria. Atmos Environ 38:3529–3533Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Bukowiecki N, Dommen J, Prevot ASH, Weingartner E, Baltensperger U (2003) Fine and ultrafine particles in the Zurich (Switzerland) area measured with a mobile laboratory: an assessment of the seasonal and regional variation throughout a year. Atmos Chem Phys 3:1477–1494Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rodríguez S, Van Dingenen R, Putaud J-P, Dell’Acqua A, Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A, Chenery S, Ho K-F, Harrison RM, Tardivo R, Scarnato B, Gianelle V (2007) A study on the relationship between mass concentrations, chemistry and number size distribution of urban fine aerosols in Milan, Barcelona and London. Atmos Chem Phys 7:605–639Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Gómez-Moreno FJ, Pujadas M, Plaza J, Rodríguez-Maroto JJ, Martínez-Lozano P, Artíñano B (2011) Influence of seasonal factors on the atmospheric particle number concentration and size distribution in Madrid. Atmos Environ 45:3169–3180Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ruuskanen J, Tuch T, Ten Brink H, Peters A, Khlystov A, Mirme A, Kos GPA, Brunekreef B, Buzorius G, Vallius M, Kreyling WG, Pekkanen J (2001) Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities. Atmos Environ 35:3729–3738Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prashant Kumar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lidia Morawska
    • 3
  • Roy M. Harrison
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Civil Engineering (C5); Office 03AA03, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (FEPS), Environmental Flow (EnFlo) Research CentreUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  3. 3.International Laboratory for Air Quality and HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Division of Environmental Health and Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Sciences/ Center of Excellence in Environmental StudiesKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations