Advertisement

Addressing Variability and Heterogeneity of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes

  • Sherri M. Biendarra-Tiegs
  • Frank J. Secreto
  • Timothy J. NelsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 1212)

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer great promise in the areas of disease modeling, basic research, drug development, and regenerative medicine. Much of their value comes from the fact that they can be used to create otherwise inaccessible cell types, such as cardiomyocytes, which are genetically matched to a patient or any other individual of interest. A consistent issue plaguing the iPSC platform, however, involves excessive variability exhibited in the differentiated products. This includes discrepancies in genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional features, cell signalling, the cell types produced from cardiac differentiation, and cardiomyocyte functionality. These properties can result from both the somatic source cells and environmental conditions related to the derivation and handling of these cells. Understanding the potential sources of variability, along with determining which factors are most relevant to a given application, are essential in advancing iPSC-based technologies.

Keywords

Cardiomyocytes Cellular microenvironment Differentiation Induced pluripotent stem cells Phenotypic variability Stem cell heterogeneity 

Abbreviations

AP

action potential

APD

action potential duration

cGMP

current Good Manufacturing Practice

CNV

copy number variation

DEG

differentially expressed gene

EB

embryoid body

ECM

extracellular matrix

ESA

etoposide sensitivity assay

ESC

embryonic stem cell

ESC-CM

embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

iPSC

induced pluripotent stem cell

iPSC-CM

induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte

mtDNA

mitochondrial DNA

SNV

single nucleotide variation

XCI

X-chromosome inactivation

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Todd and Karen Wanek Family Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome at Mayo Clinic. Figures were created with BioRender.

Conflict of interest

T.J.N and Mayo Clinic have licensed reprogramming technology to ReGen Theranostics, Inc. in Rochester, MN.

Ethical approval

The authors declare that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

References

  1. Abyzov A et al (2012) Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 492:438–442.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11629CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Andoh-Noda T et al (2017) Differential X chromosome inactivation patterns during the propagation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Keio J Med 66:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2016-0015-OACrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anguera MC et al (2012) Molecular signatures of human induced pluripotent stem cells highlight sex differences and cancer genes. Cell Stem Cell 11:75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibald PRT, Chandra A, Thomas D, Chose O, Massourides E, Laabi Y, Williams DJ (2016) Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39:1847–1858.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1659-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Avior Y, Biancotti JC, Benvenisty N (2015) TeratoScore: assessing the differentiation potential of human pluripotent stem cells by quantitative expression analysis of teratomas. Stem Cell Rep 4:967–974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ban K et al (2015) Non-genetic purification of ventricular cardiomyocytes from differentiating embryonic stem cells through molecular beacons targeting IRX-4. Stem Cell Rep 5:1239–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.10.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ban K, Bae S, Yoon YS (2017) Current strategies and challenges for purification of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Theranostics 7:2067–2077.  https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.19427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauwens CL, Peerani R, Niebruegge S, Woodhouse KA, Kumacheva E, Husain M, Zandstra PW (2008) Control of human embryonic stem cell colony and aggregate size heterogeneity influences differentiation trajectories. Stem Cells 26:2300–2310.  https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2008-0183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauwens CL et al (2011) Geometric control of cardiomyogenic induction in human pluripotent stem cells. Tissue Eng Pt A 17:1901–1909.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ben-Ari M et al (2016) Developmental changes in electrophysiological characteristics of human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. Heart Rhythm 13:2379–2387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Binah O, Weissman A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rosen MR (2013) Integrating beat rate variability: from single cells to hearts. Heart Rhythm 10:928–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bizy A et al (2013) Myosin light chain 2-based selection of human iPSC-derived early ventricular cardiac myocytes. Stem Cell Res 11:1335–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2013.09.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Blauwkamp TA, Nigam S, Ardehali R, Weissman IL, Nusse R (2012) Endogenous Wnt signalling in human embryonic stem cells generates an equilibrium of distinct lineage-specified progenitors. Nat Commun 3:1070.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruck T, Benvenisty N (2011) Meta-analysis of the heterogeneity of X chromosome inactivation in human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res 6:187–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2010.12.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Burridge PW et al (2011) A Universal system for highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells that eliminates interline variability. PLoS One 6:ARTN e18293.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burridge PW et al (2014) Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 11:855–860.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmeth.2999CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Burrows CK, Banovich NE, Pavlovic BJ, Patterson K, Gallego Romero I, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y (2016) Genetic variation, not cell type of origin, underlies the majority of identifiable regulatory differences in iPSCs. PLoS Genet 12:e1005793.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Carcamo-Orive I et al (2017) Analysis of transcriptional variability in a large human iPSC library reveals genetic and non-genetic determinants of heterogeneity. Cell Stem Cell 20:518–532 e519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Carson D et al (2016) Nanotopography-induced structural anisotropy and sarcomere development in human cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:21923–21932.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11671CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen XL, Chen A, Woo TL, Choo ABH, Reuveny S, SKW O (2010) Investigations into the metabolism of two-dimensional colony and suspended microcarrier cultures of human embryonic stem cells in serum-free media. Stem Cells Dev 19:1781–1792.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen G et al (2011) Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat Methods 8:424–429.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen ZF et al (2017) Subtype-specific promoter-driven action potential imaging for precise disease modelling and drug testing in hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Eur Heart J 38:292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng L et al (2012) Low incidence of DNA sequence variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by nonintegrating plasmid expression. Cell Stem Cell 10:337–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Chetty S, Pagliuca FW, Honore C, Kweudjeu A, Rezania A, Melton DA (2013) A simple tool to improve pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Nat Methods 10:553–556.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2442CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Choi J et al (2015) A comparison of genetically matched cell lines reveals the equivalence of human iPSCs and ESCs. Nat Biotechnol 33:1173–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3388CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Churko JM et al (2018) Defining human cardiac transcription factor hierarchies using integrated single-cell heterogeneity analysis. Nat Commun 9:ARTN 4906.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07333-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crombie DE et al (2017) Development of a modular automated system for maintenance and differentiation of adherent human pluripotent stem cells. SLAS Discov 22:1016–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2472555217696797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dalton S (2015) Linking the cell cycle to cell fate decisions. Trends Cell Biol 25:592–600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. D’Antonio M et al (2018) Insights into the mutational burden of human induced pluripotent stem cells from an integrative multi-omics approach. Cell Rep 24:883–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. DeBoever C et al (2017) Large-scale profiling reveals the influence of genetic variation on gene expression in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 20:533–546 e537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.03.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Denning C et al (2016) Cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells: from laboratory curiosity to industrial biomedical platform. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863:1728–1748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.10.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Devalla HD et al (2015) Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. Embo Mol Med 7:394–410.  https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201404757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Dorn T et al (2015) Direct Nkx2-5 transcriptional repression of Isl1 controls cardiomyocyte subtype identity. Stem Cells 33:1113–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Du DTM, Hellen N, Kane C, Terracciano CMN (2015) Action potential morphology of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes does not predict cardiac chamber specificity and is dependent on cell density. Biophys J 108:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Dubois NC et al (2011) SIRPA is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29:1011–U1082.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Elliott DA et al (2011) NKX2-5(eGFP/w) hESCs for isolation of human cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 8:1037–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Espinosa Angarica V, Del Sol A (2016) Modeling heterogeneity in the pluripotent state: a promising strategy for improving the efficiency and fidelity of stem cell differentiation. Bioessays 38:758–768.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Fazeli A et al (2011) Altered patterns of differentiation in karyotypically abnormal human embryonic stem cells. Int J Dev Biol 55:175–180.  https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103177afCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Flaim CJ, Teng D, Chien S, Bhatia SN (2008) Combinatorial signaling microenvironments for studying stem cell fate. Stem Cells Dev 17:29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2007.0085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fong AH et al (2016) Three-dimensional adult cardiac extracellular matrix promotes maturation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Tissue Eng Pt A 22:1016–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Forsyth NR, Kay A, Hampson K, Downing A, Talbot R, McWhir J (2008) Transcriptome alterations due to physiological normoxic (2% O-2) culture of human embryonic stem cells. Regen Med 3:817–833.  https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.6.817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. French A et al (2015) Enabling consistency in pluripotent stern cell-derived products for research and development and clinical applications through material standards. Stem Cells Transl Med 4:217–223.  https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2014-0233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Friedman CE et al (2018) Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of cardiac differentiation from human PSCs reveals HOPX-dependent cardiomyocyte maturation. Cell Stem Cell 23:586–598 e588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Gallagher MM et al (2006) Distribution and prognostic significance of QT intervals in the lowest half centile in 12,012 apparently healthy persons. Am J Cardiol 98:933–935.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gao L et al (2018) Large cardiac muscle patches engineered from human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cells improve recovery from myocardial infarction in swine. Circulation 137:1712–1730.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Garitaonandia I et al (2015) Increased risk of genetic and epigenetic instability in human embryonic stem cells associated with specific culture conditions. PLoS One 10:ARTN e0118307.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Geens M et al (2016) Female human pluripotent stem cells rapidly lose X chromosome inactivation marks and progress to a skewed methylation pattern during culture. Mol Hum Reprod 22:285–298.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaw004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Germain PL, Testa G (2017) Taming human genetic variability: transcriptomic meta-analysis guides the experimental design and interpretation of iPSC-based disease modeling. Stem Cell Rep 8:1784–1796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gorospe G, Zhu RJ, Millrod MA, Zambidis ET, Tung L, Vidal R (2014) Automated grouping of action potentials of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:2389–2395.  https://doi.org/10.1109/Tbme.2014.2311387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Guo GJ et al (2016) Serum-based culture conditions provoke gene expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells as revealed by single-cell analysis. Cell Rep 14:956–965.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Gupta P, Hourigan K, Jadhav S, Bellare J, Verma P (2017) Effect of lactate and pH on mouse pluripotent stem cells: importance of media analysis. Biochem Eng J 118:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hannes T et al (2015) Electrophysiological characteristics of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes are cell line-dependent. Cell Physiol Biochem 35:305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000369697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hartjes KA, Li X, Martinez-Fernandez A, Roemmich AJ, Larsen BT, Terzic A, Nelson TJ (2014) Selection via pluripotency-related transcriptional screen minimizes the influence of somatic origin on iPSC differentiation propensity. Stem Cells 32:2350–2359.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Hiura H et al (2013) Stability of genomic imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. BMC Genet 14:32.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-32CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoekstra SD, Stringer S, Heine VM, Posthuma D (2017) Genetically-informed patient selection for iPSC studies of complex diseases may aid in reducing cellular heterogeneity. Front Cell Neurosci 11:164.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Hong SH, Rampalli S, Lee JB, McNicol J, Collins T, Draper JS, Bhatia M (2011) Cell fate potential of human pluripotent stem cells is encoded by histone modifications. Cell Stem Cell 9:24–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hrstka SC, Li X, Nelson TJ, Wanek Program Genetics Pipeline G (2017) NOTCH1-dependent nitric oxide signaling deficiency in hypoplastic left heart syndrome revealed through patient-specific phenotypes detected in bioengineered cardiogenesis. Stem Cells 35:1106–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hussein SM et al (2011) Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471:58–62.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. International Stem Cell I (2018) Assessment of established techniques to determine developmental and malignant potential of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 9:1925.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04011-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. International Stem Cell Initiative C et al (2010) Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 46:247–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-010-9297-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Iseoka H et al (2018) Pivotal role of non-cardiomyocytes in electromechanical and therapeutic potential of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered cardiac tissue. Tissue Eng Pt A 24:287–300.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ishida M et al (2018) Transplantation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes is superior to somatic stem cell therapy for restoring cardiac function and oxygen consumption in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Transplantation 103(2):291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ivanov NA et al (2016) Strong components of epigenetic memory in cultured human fibroblasts related to site of origin and donor age. PLoS Genet 12:e1005819.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005819CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Jacobs K, Mertzanidou A, Geens M, Nguyen HT, Staessen C, Spits C (2014) Low-grade chromosomal mosaicism in human somatic and embryonic stem cell populations. Nat Commun 5:4227.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Jacobs K et al (2016) Higher-density culture in human embryonic stem cells results in DNA damage and genome instability. Stem Cell Rep 6:330–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jeziorowska D et al (2017) Differential sarcomere and electrophysiological maturation of human iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes in monolayer vs. aggregation-based differentiation protocols. Int J Mol Sci 18:ARTN 1173.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johnson AA, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Nelson TJ, Pulido JS, Marmorstein AD (2017) Disease modeling studies using induced pluripotent stem cells: are we using enough controls? Regen Med 12:899–903.  https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2017-0101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Josowitz R et al (2014) Identification and purification of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial-like cardiomyocytes based on sarcolipin expression. PLoS One 9:ARTN e101316.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Josowitz R et al (2016) Autonomous and non-autonomous defects underlie hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in BRAF-mutant hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep 7:355–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.07.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jung CB et al (2012) Dantrolene rescues arrhythmogenic RYR2 defect in a patient-specific stem cell model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Embo Mol Med 4:180–191.  https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201100194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Kalmar T, Lim C, Hayward P, Munoz-Descalzo S, Nichols J, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Martinez Arias A (2009) Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7:e1000149.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Kane C, Terracciano CMN (2017) Concise review: criteria for chamber-specific categorization of human cardiac myocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 35:1881–1897.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Kane C, Du DTM, Hellen N, Terracciano CM (2016) The fallacy of assigning chamber specificity to iPSC cardiac myocytes from action potential morphology. Biophys J 110:281–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Kang E et al (2016) Age-related accumulation of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in adult-derived human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 18:625–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kapoor N, Liang WB, Marban E, Cho HC (2013) Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18. Nat Biotechnol 31:54–62.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Karakikes I et al (2014) Small molecule-mediated directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells toward ventricular cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells Transl Med 3:18–31.  https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2013-0110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kato R et al (2016) Parametric analysis of colony morphology of non-labelled live human pluripotent stem cells for cell quality control. Sci Rep 6:34009.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Kattman SJ et al (2011) Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 8:228–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kilpinen H et al (2017) Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs. Nature 546:370–375.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Kim KP et al (2007) Gene-specific vulnerability to imprinting variability in human embryonic stem cell lines. Genome Res 17:1731–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6609207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Kim C et al (2010) Non-cardiomyocytes influence the electrophysiological maturation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes during differentiation. Stem Cells Dev 19:783–795.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2009.0349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kobayashi T, Kageyama R (2010) Hes1 regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation by suppressing Notch signaling. Genes Cells 15:689–698.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01413.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Kobayashi T, Mizuno H, Imayoshi I, Furusawa C, Shirahige K, Kageyama R (2009) The cyclic gene Hes1 contributes to diverse differentiation responses of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev 23:1870–1875.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1823109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Konagaya S, Ando T, Yamauchi T, Suemori H, Iwata H (2015) Long-term maintenance of human induced pluripotent stem cells by automated cell culture system. Sci Rep 5:ARTN 16647.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kowalski MP, Yoder A, Liu L, Pajak L (2012) Controlling embryonic stem cell growth and differentiation by automation: enhanced and more reliable differentiation for drug discovery. J Biomol Screen 17:1171–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057112452783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Kuppusamy KT et al (2015) Let-7 family of microRNA is required for maturation and adult-like metabolism in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E2785–E2794.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424042112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kyttala A et al (2016) Genetic variability overrides the impact of parental cell type and determines iPSC differentiation potential. Stem Cell Rep 6:200–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Laco F et al (2018) Unraveling the inconsistencies of cardiac differentiation efficiency induced by the GSK3 beta inhibitor CHIR99021 in human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 10:1851–1866.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lee JH, Protze SI, Laksman Z, Backx PH, Keller GM (2017) Human pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes develop from distinct mesoderm populations. Cell Stem Cell 21:179–194.e4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Lemme M et al (2018) Atrial-like engineered heart tissue: an in vitro model of the human atrium. Stem Cell Rep 11:1378–1390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Li C et al (2015) Genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells: results from 24 clones derived from a single C57BL/6 mouse. PLoS One 10:e0120585.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120585CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Lian XJ et al (2015) Chemically defined, albumin-free human cardiomyocyte generation. Nat Methods 12:595–596.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3448CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Liang G, Zhang Y (2013) Genetic and epigenetic variations in iPSCs: potential causes and implications for application. Cell Stem Cell 13:149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Lim HJ, Han JY, Woo DH, Kim SE, Kim SK, Kang HG, Kim JH (2011) Biochemical and morphological effects of hypoxic environment on human embryonic stem cells in long-term culture and differentiating embryoid bodies. Mol Cell 31:123–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-0016-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lin YS et al (2017) Heparin promotes cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells in chemically defined albumin-free medium, enabling consistent manufacture of cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells Transl Med 6:527–538.  https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Lipsitz YY, Tonge PD, Zandstra PW (2018) Chemically controlled aggregation of pluripotent stem cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 115:2061–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Liu YW et al (2018) Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes restore function in infarcted hearts of non-human primates. Nat Biotechnol 36:597–605.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Lundy SD, Zhu WZ, Regnier M, Laflamme MA (2013) Structural and functional maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 22:1991–2002.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0490CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Mallon BS, Hamilton RS, Kozhich OA, Johnson KR, Fann YC, Rao MS, Robey PG (2014) Comparison of the molecular profiles of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells of isogenic origin. Stem Cell Res 12:376–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2013.11.010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Mantsoki A, Devailly G, Joshi A (2016) Gene expression variability in mammalian embryonic stem cells using single cell RNA-seq data. Comput Biol Chem 63:52–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.02.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Marczenke M, Fell J, Piccini I, Ropke A, Seebohm G, Greber B (2017) Generation and cardiac subtype-specific differentiation of PITX2-deficient human iPS cell lines for exploring familial atrial fibrillation. Stem Cell Res 21:26–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.03.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Mayshar Y et al (2010) Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:521–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Mekhoubad S, Bock C, de Boer AS, Kiskinis E, Meissner A, Eggan K (2012) Erosion of dosage compensation impacts human iPSC disease modeling. Cell Stem Cell 10:595–609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Merkle FT et al (2017) Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations. Nature 545:229–233.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Mihic A et al (2014) The effect of cyclic stretch on maturation and 3D tissue formation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials 35:2798–2808.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Mitalipova MM et al (2005) Preserving the genetic integrity of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 23:19–20.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0105-19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Moretti A et al (2010) Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med 363:1397–1409.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Muller FJ et al (2011) A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nat Methods 8:315–317.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. Musunuru K et al (2018) Induced pluripotent stem cells for cardiovascular disease modeling and precision medicine: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circ Genom Precis Med 11:e000043.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HCG.0000000000000043CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. Narsinh KH et al (2011) Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest 121:1217–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44635CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Nazareth EJP et al (2013) High-throughput fingerprinting of human pluripotent stem cell fate responses and lineage bias. Nat Methods 10:1225–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmeth.2684CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. Newman AM, Cooper JB (2010) Lab-specific gene expression signatures in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:258–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Nguyen HT, Geens M, Spits C (2013) Genetic and epigenetic instability in human pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod Update 19:187–205.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Nishino K, Umezawa A (2016) DNA methylation dynamics in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Cell 29:97–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-016-0139-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Nishizawa M et al (2016) Epigenetic variation between human induced pluripotent stem cell lines is an indicator of differentiation capacity. Cell Stem Cell 19:341–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Nunes SS et al (2013) Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 10:781–787.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2524CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Osterloh JM, Mulelane K (2018) Manipulating cell fate while confronting reproducibility concerns. Biochem Pharmacol 151:144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2018.01.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Paci M, Passini E, Severi S, Hyttinen J, Rodriguez B (2017) Phenotypic variability in LQT3 human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and their response to antiarrhythmic pharmacologic therapy: an in silico approach. Heart Rhythm 14:1704–1712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. Paige SL, Osugi T, Afanasiev OK, Pabon L, Reinecke H, Murry CE (2010) Endogenous Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling is required for cardiac differentiation in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 5:e11134.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Parikh SS et al (2017) Thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones promote functional T-tubule development in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ Res 121:1323–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1161/Circresaha.117.311920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Pauklin S, Vallier L (2014) The cell-cycle state of stem cells determines cell fate propensity. Cell 156:1338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Paull D et al (2015) Automated, high-throughput derivation, characterization and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Methods 12:885–892.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmeth.3507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Pei F et al (2017) Chemical-defined and albumin-free generation of human atrial and ventricular myocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res 19:94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.01.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Pekkanen-Mattila M, Chapman H, Kerkela E, Suuronen R, Skottman H, Koivisto AP, Aalto-Setala K (2010) Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: demonstration of a portion of cardiac cells with fairly mature electrical phenotype. Exp Biol Med 235:522–530.  https://doi.org/10.1258/ebm.2010.009345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Perales-Clemente E et al (2016) Natural underlying mtDNA heteroplasmy as a potential source of intra-person hiPSC variability. EMBO J 35:1979–1990.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201694892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Pick M, Stelzer Y, Bar-Nur O, Mayshar Y, Eden A, Benvenisty N (2009) Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 27:2686–2690.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Protze SI, Liu J, Nussinovitch U, Ohana L, Backx PH, Gepstein L, Keller GM (2017) Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat Biotechnol 35:56–68.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Qiu XX et al (2017) Rapamycin and CHIR99021 coordinate robust cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells via reducing p53-dependent apoptosis. J Am Heart Assoc 6:ARTN e005295.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Rao MS et al (2018) Illustrating the potency of current Good Manufacturing Practice-compliant induced pluripotent stem cell lines as a source of multiple cell lineages using standardized protocols. Cytotherapy 20:861–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.03.037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Reynolds N et al (2012) NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 10:583–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Ribeiro AJ et al (2015) Contractility of single cardiomyocytes differentiated from pluripotent stem cells depends on physiological shape and substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:12705–12710.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508073112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  132. Rouhani F, Kumasaka N, de Brito MC, Bradley A, Vallier L, Gaffney D (2014) Genetic background drives transcriptional variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS Genet 10:e1004432.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. Ruan JL et al (2015) Mechanical stress promotes maturation of human myocardium from pluripotent stem cell-derived progenitors. Stem Cells 33:2148–2157.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. Ruan JL et al (2016) Mechanical stress conditioning and electrical stimulation promote contractility and force Maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human cardiac tissue. Circulation 134:1557–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1161/Circulationaha.114.014998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. Salomonis N et al (2016) Integrated genomic analysis of diverse induced pluripotent stem cells from the progenitor cell biology consortium. Stem Cell Rep 7:110–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sanchez C et al (2014) Inter-subject variability in human atrial action potential in sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. PLoS One 9:ARTN e105897.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Sanchez-Freire V et al (2014) Effect of human donor cell source on differentiation and function of cardiac induced pluripotent stem cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:436–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. Sartiani L, Bettiol E, Stillitano F, Mugelli A, Cerbai E, Jaconi ME (2007) Developmental changes in cardiomyocytes differentiated from human embryonic stem cells: a molecular and electrophysiological approach. Stem Cells 25:1136–1144.  https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006.0466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Schocken D et al (2018) Comparative analysis of media effects on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in proarrhythmia risk assessment. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 90:39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2017.11.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Schuster J et al (2015) Transcriptome profiling reveals degree of variability in induced pluripotent stem cell lines: impact for human disease modeling. Cell Rep 17:327–337.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2015.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Schwach V et al (2017) A COUP-TFII human embryonic stem cell reporter line to identify and select atrial cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep 9:1765–1779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Schweizer PA et al (2017) Subtype-specific differentiation of cardiac pacemaker cell clusters from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 8:229.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0681-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Scuderi GJ, Butcher J (2017) Naturally engineered maturation of cardiomyocytes. Front Cell Dev Biol 5:50.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Secreto FJ et al (2017) Quantification of etoposide hypersensitivity: a sensitive, functional method for assessing pluripotent stem cell quality. Stem Cells Transl Med 6:1829–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. Serra M et al (2010) Improving expansion of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells in perfused bioreactors through oxygen control. J Biotechnol 148:208–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.06.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Shen N et al (2017) Steps toward maturation of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes by defined physical signals. Stem Cell Rep 9:122–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Sheng XW, Reppel M, Nguemo F, Mohammad FI, Kuzmenkin A, Hescheler J, Pfannkuche K (2012) Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: response to TTX and lidocain reveals strong cell to cell variability. PLoS One 7:ARTN e45963.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Silva SS, Rowntree RK, Mekhoubad S, Lee JT (2008) X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4820–4825.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712136105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. Silva M et al (2015) Generating iPSCs: translating cell reprogramming science into scalable and robust biomanufacturing strategies. Cell Stem Cell 16:13–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.12.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Singer ZS et al (2014) Dynamic heterogeneity and DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 55:319–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. Singh AM (2015) Cell cycle-driven heterogeneity: on the road to demystifying the transitions between “poised” and “restricted” pluripotent cell states. Stem Cells Int 2015:219514.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/219514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. Singh AM et al (2014) Cell-cycle control of developmentally regulated transcription factors accounts for heterogeneity in human pluripotent cells. Stem Cell Rep 2:398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Smith A (2013) Nanog heterogeneity: tilting at windmills? Cell Stem Cell 13:6–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. Smith RCG, Stumpf PS, Ridden SJ, Sim A, Filippi S, Harrington HA, MacArthur BD (2017) Nanog fluctuations in embryonic stem cells highlight the problem of measurement in cell biology. Biophys J 112:2641–2652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. Sturrock M, Hellander A, Matzavinos A, Chaplain MA (2013) Spatial stochastic modelling of the Hes1 gene regulatory network: intrinsic noise can explain heterogeneity in embryonic stem cell differentiation. J R Soc Interface 10:20120988.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0988CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. Taapken SM, Nisler BS, Newton MA, Sampsell-Barron TL, Leonhard KA, McIntire EM, Montgomery KD (2011) Karotypic abnormalities in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29:313–314.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Tan Y et al (2015) Silicon nanowire-induced maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nano Lett 15:2765–2772.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl502227aCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. Tanasijevic B, Dai B, Ezashi T, Livingston K, Roberts RM, Rasmussen TP (2009) Progressive accumulation of epigenetic heterogeneity during human ES cell culture. Epigenetics 4:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Tanwar V et al (2014) Gremlin 2 promotes differentiation of embryonic stem cells to atrial fate by activation of the JNK signaling pathway. Stem Cells 32:1774–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1703CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. Tesarova L, Simara P, Stejskal S, Koutna I (2016) The aberrant DNA methylation profile of human induced pluripotent stem cells is connected to the reprogramming process and is normalized during in vitro culture. PLoS One 11:e0157974.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157974CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. Tiburcy M et al (2017) Defined engineered human myocardium with advanced maturation for applications in heart failure modeling and repair. Circulation 135:1832–1847.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. Titmarsh DM, Ovchinnikov DA, Wolvetang EJ, Cooper-White JJ (2013) Full factorial screening of human embryonic stem cell maintenance with multiplexed microbioreactor arrays. Biotechnol J 8:822–834.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201200375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Tohyama S et al (2013) Distinct metabolic flow enables large-scale purification of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Stem Cell 12:127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Tohyama S et al (2016) Glutamine oxidation is indispensable for survival of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Metab 23:663–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.03.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Tsankov AM et al (2015) A qPCR ScoreCard quantifies the differentiation potential of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 33:1182–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. Tu C, Chao BS, Wu JC (2018) Strategies for improving the maturity of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ Res 123:512–514.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. Uosaki H, Fukushima H, Takeuchi A, Matsuoka S, Nakatsuji N, Yamanaka S, Yamashita JK (2011) Efficient and scalable purification of cardiomyocytes from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells by VCAM1 surface expression. PLoS One 6:ARTN e23657.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Veevers J et al (2018) Cell-surface marker signature for enrichment of ventricular cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 11:828–841.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Vestergaard ML et al (2017) Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes self-arrange with areas of different subtypes during differentiation. Stem Cells Dev 26:1566–1577.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Vitale AM, Matigian NA, Ravishankar S, Bellette B, Wood SA, Wolvetang EJ, Mackay-Sim A (2012) Variability in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells: importance for disease modeling. Stem Cells Transl Med 1:641–650.  https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2012-0043CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. Wahlestedt M, Ameur A, Moraghebi R, Norddahl GL, Sten G, Woods NB, Bryder D (2014) Somatic cells with a heavy mitochondrial DNA mutational load render induced pluripotent stem cells with distinct differentiation defects. Stem Cells 32:1173–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Wang G et al (2014) Modeling the mitochondrial cardiomyopathy of Barth syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cell and heart-on-chip technologies. Nat Med 20:616–623.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. Weng ZH et al (2014) A simple, cost-effective but highly efficient system for deriving ventricular cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 23:1704–1716.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2013.0509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. Wu JC, Fan YJ, Tzanakakis ES (2015) Increased culture density is linked to decelerated proliferation, prolonged G(1) phase, and enhanced propensity for differentiation of self-renewing human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 24:892–903.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Wutz A (2012) Epigenetic alterations in human pluripotent stem cells: a tale of two cultures. Cell Stem Cell 11:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Wyles SP et al (2016) Modeling structural and functional deficiencies of RBM20 familial dilated cardiomyopathy using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 25:254–265.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Xu H et al (2012) Highly efficient derivation of ventricular cardiomyocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells with a distinct epigenetic signature. Cell Res 22:142–154.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Yassa ME, Mansour IA, Sewelam NI, Hamza H, Gaafar T (2018) The impact of growth factors on human induced pluripotent stem cells differentiation into cardiomyocytes. Life Sci 196:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.01.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Yazawa M, Hsueh B, Jia X, Pasca AM, Bernstein JA, Hallmayer J, Dolmetsch RE (2011) Using induced pluripotent stem cells to investigate cardiac phenotypes in Timothy syndrome. Nature 471:230–234.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  181. Yechikov S, Copaciu R, Gluck JM, Deng W, Chiamvimonvat N, Chan JW, Lieu DK (2016) Same-single-cell analysis of pacemaker-specific markers in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte subtypes classified by electrophysiology. Stem Cells 34:2670–2680.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. Yeo D et al (2013) Improving embryonic stem cell expansion through the combination of perfusion and Bioprocess model design. PLoS One 8:e81728.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  183. Yiangou L et al (2019) Method to synchronize cell cycle of human pluripotent stem cells without affecting their fundamental characteristics. Stem Cell Rep 12:165–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.11.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Yoshida Y, Yamanaka S (2017) Induced pluripotent stem cells 10 years later: for cardiac applications. Circ Res 120:1958–1968.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Young MA et al (2012) Background mutations in parental cells account for most of the genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10:570–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  186. Yu J et al (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318:1917–1920.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Yu L et al (2018a) Low cell-matrix adhesion reveals two subtypes of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 11:142–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Yu P, Nie Q, Tang C, Zhang L (2018b) Nanog induced intermediate state in regulating stem cell differentiation and reprogramming. BMC Syst Biol 12:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-018-0552-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  189. Zhang QZ et al (2011) Direct differentiation of atrial and ventricular myocytes from human embryonic stem cells by alternating retinoid signals. Cell Res 21:579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Zhang DH, Shadrin IY, Lam J, Xian HQ, Snodgrass HR, Bursac N (2013) Tissue-engineered cardiac patch for advanced functional maturation of human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials 34:5813–5820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. Zhu WZ, Xie YH, Moyes KW, Gold JD, Askari B, Laflamme MA (2010) Neuregulin/ErbB signaling regulates cardiac subtype specification in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Circ Res 107:776–U258.  https://doi.org/10.1161/Circresaha.110.223917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. Zhu RJ, Millrod MA, Zambidis ET, Tung L (2016) Variability of action potentials within and among cardiac cell clusters derived from human embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep 6:ARTN 18544.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18544CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherri M. Biendarra-Tiegs
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frank J. Secreto
    • 2
    • 3
  • Timothy J. Nelson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome-Center for Regenerative MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Department of Cardiovascular MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  5. 5.Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric CardiologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations