pp 1-13 | Cite as
Rehabilitation of Neuromotor Disabilities in Aquatic Microgravity Environment
The aquatic environment has a high potential in rehabilitation treatment of acute lesions and in chronic diseases. The Safe Bearing Back method is proposed to stimulate the reorganization of deteriorated sensory neuromotor skills. The aim of the present study was to verify the effectiveness and the long-term maintenance of the benefits of a specific thermal rehabilitation training in neuromotor and neurological disabilities. Seventy four patients were evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Tinetti Gait-Balance Scale (TIN), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. In addition, a general health index was developed, conceived as a linear combination, with unit weights, of the normalized FIM, TIN, and VAS indicators. Measurements were made at T1 (baseline before treatment), T2 (after a five-month treatment, which was the end of treatment), and T3 (6 months after the end of treatment). Self-sufficiency, walking ability, and subjective pain perception were improved after the treatment. The improvement tapered off during the six-month-long follow-up, but the patients’ condition remained well compared with the baseline level before the implementation of the treatment program. We conclude that hydrokinesitherapy with the Safe Bearing Back method demonstrates is clearly effective in the immediate and medium-term rehabilitation of neuromotor diseases.
KeywordsAquatic microgravity environment Chronic disease Health index Hydrokinesitherapy Neuromotor disabilities Rehabilitation Treatment program
The authors declare no competing interests in relation to this article.
- Alcalde GE, Fonseca AC, Bôscoa TF, Gonçalves MR, Bernardo GC, Pianna B, Carnavale BF, Gimenes C, Barrile SR, Arca EA (2017) Effect of aquatic physical therapy on pain perception, functional capacity and quality of life in older people with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 18(1):317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Baena-Beato PÁ, Artero EG, Arroyo-Morales M, Robles-Fuentes A, Gatto-Cardia MC, Delgado-Fernández M (2014) Aquatic therapy improves pain, disability, quality of life, body composition and fitness in sedentary adults with chronic low back pain. A controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 28(4):350–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Caro-Morán E, Morillas-Ruiz J, Galiano-Castillo N, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Arroyo-Morales M (2013) Aquatic exercise in a chest-high pool for hormone therapy-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors: a pragmatic controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 27(2):123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Battista T, Fortuna F, Maturo F (2016) Parametric functional analysis of variance for fish biodiversity assessment. J Environ Inf 28(2):101–109Google Scholar
- Lambeck J (2001) Hydrotherapy in adult neurology. EWAC Medical http://www.ewac.com. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
- Prins JH (2009) Aquatic rehabilitation. J Sports Sci 3(2):45–51Google Scholar
- Saggini R, Bellomo RG, Iodice P, Di Pancrazio L, Pizella V, Barassi G (2008) The painful shoulder in the sport: bioprogressive optimization rehabilitation project. Euro Med Phys 1(3):44Google Scholar
- Stein J (2004) Motor development, the brain, and aquatic therapy. Aquat Ther J 6(2):19–23Google Scholar
- Zamarioli A, Pezolato A, Mieli E, Shimano C (2008) The significance of water rehabilitation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Fizjoterapia 16(2):3–6Google Scholar