Finite Elements Modeling in Diagnostics of Small Closed Pneumothorax
Posttraumatic pneumothorax still remains to be a serious clinical problem and requires a comprehensive diagnostic and monitoring during treatment. The aim of this paper is to present a computer method of modeling of small closed pneumothorax. Radiological images of 34 patients of both sexes with small closed pneumothorax were taken into consideration. The control group consisted of X-rays of 22 patients treated because of tension pneumothorax. In every single case the model was correlated with the clinical manifestations. The procedure of computational rapid analysis (CRA) for in silico analysis of surgical intervention was introduced. It included implementation of computerize tomography images and their automatic conversion into 3D finite elements model (FEM). In order to segmentize the 3D model, an intelligent procedure of domain recognition was used. In the final step, a computer simulation project of fluid-structure interaction was built, using the ANSYS\Workbench environment of multi-physics analysis. The FEM model and computer simulation project were employed in the analysis in order to optimize surgical intervention. The model worked out well and was compatible with the clinical manifestations of pneumothorax. We conclude that the created FEM model is a promising tool for facilitation of diagnostic procedures and prognosis of treatment in the case of small closed pneumothorax.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Computer modeling Diagnostic Finite elements method In silico analysis Pneumothorax
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.
- Lorkowski J, Teul I, Hładki W, Kotela I (2014b) The evaluation of procedure and treatment outcome in patients with tension pneumothorax. Ann Acad Med Stetin 60(1):18–23Google Scholar
- Moore FO, Goslar PW, Coimbra R, Velmahos G, Brown CV, Coopwood TB Jr, Lottenberg L, Phelan HA, Bruns BR, Sherck JP, Norwood SH, Barnes SL, Matthews MR, Hoff WS, de Moya MA, Bansal V, Hu CK, Karmy-Jones RC, Vinces F, Pembaur K, Notrica DM, Haan JM (2011) Blunt traumatic occult pneumothorax: is observation safe? – results of a prospective, AAST multicenter study. J Trauma 70(5):1019–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myers JW, Neighbors M, Tannehill-Jones R (2002) Principles of pathophysiology and emergency medical care. Delmar Thomson Learning, Albany, p 121. ISBN 0-7668-2548-5Google Scholar
- Plourde M, Emond M, Lavoie A, Guimont C, Le Sage N, Chauny JM, Bergeron E, Vanier L, Moore L, Allain-Boulé N, Fratu RF, Dufresne M (2014) Cohort study on the prevalence and risk factors for delayed pulmonary complications in adults following minor blunt thoracic trauma. Can J Emerg Med Care 16(2):136–143Google Scholar
- Roberts DJ, Leigh-Smith S, Faris PD, Ball CG, Robertson HL, Blackmore C, Dixon E, Kirkpatrick AW, Kortbeek JB, Stelfox HT (2014) Clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 3:3. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-3 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar