Agent-Based Models in Ecology: Patterns and Alternative Theories of Adaptive Behaviour
Ecologists have used agent-based models for a long time, but refer to them as “individual-based models” (IBMs). Common characteristics of IBMs are discrete representation of unique individuals; local interactions; use of adaptive, fitness-seeking behaviour; explicit representation of how individuals and their environment affect each other; and representation of full life cycles.
Ecology has contributed to agent-based modelling in general by showing how to use agent-based techniques to explain real systems. Ecologists have used IBMs to understand how dynamics of many real systems arise from traits of individuals and their environment. Two modelling strategies have proven particularly useful.
The first strategy is “pattern-oriented modelling” (POM). POM starts with identifying a variety of observed patterns, at different scales and at both individual and system levels, that characterize the system’s dynamics and mechanisms. These patterns, along with the problem being addressed and conceptual models of the system, provide the basis for designing and testing an IBM. A model’s variables and mechanisms are chosen because they are essential for reproducing these characteristic patterns. After an IBM is assembled, alternative versions (different theories for individual behaviour; different parameterizations) can be tested by how well they reproduce the patterns.
The second strategy is developing general and reusable theory for the adaptive behaviour of individuals. A “theory” is a model of some specific individual behaviour from which system-level dynamics emerge. Theory can be developed by hypothesizing alternative models for the behaviour, then using the IBM to see which alternative best reproduces a variety of patterns that characterize the system dynamics of interest. Empirical observations are used to develop both theories and the patterns used to test and falsify them.
These two strategies are demonstrated with example models of schooling behaviour in fish, spatiotemporal dynamics in forests, and dispersal of brown bears.
KeywordsAdaptive Behaviour Habitat Selection Ecological Modelling Alternative Theory Beech Forest
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D.B. Botkin (1993) Forest dynamics: an ecological model. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Camazine, J.-L. Deneubourg, N.R. Franks, J. Sneyd, G. Theraulaz, and E. Bonabeau (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- 5.D.L. DeAngelis and L.J. Gross (1992) Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: populations, communities and ecosystems. In: D.L. DeAngelis and L.J. Gross, editors, Individual-based models and approaches in ecology, pp. 523–525. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
- 6.D.L. DeAngelis and W.M. Mooij (2003) In praise of mechanistically-rich models. In: C.D. Canham, J.J. Cole, and W.K. Lauenroth, editors, Models in ecosystem science, pp. 63–82. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- 9.V. Grimm and U. Berger (2003) Seeing the forest for the trees, and vice versa: pattern-oriented ecological modelling. In: L. Seuront and P.G. Strutton, editors, Handbook of scaling methods in aquatic ecology: measurement, analysis, simulation, pp. 411–428. CRC Press, Boca Raton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.V. Grimm and S.F. Railsback (2005) Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
- 12.B.C. Harvey and S.F. Railsback. Elevated turbidity reduces abundance and biomass of stream trout in an individual-based model. in prep.Google Scholar
- 14.A. Huth (1992) Ein Simulationsmodell zur Erklärung der kooperativen Bewegung von polarisierten Fischschwärmen. Phd, Universität Marburg.Google Scholar
- 17.C. Neuert (1999) Die Dynamik räumlicher Strukturen in naturnahen Buchenwäldern Mitteleuropas. Phd, Universität Marburg.Google Scholar
- 18.C. Neuert, C. Rademacher, V. Grundmann, C. Wissel, and V. Grimm (2001) Struktur und Dynamik von Buchenurwäldern: Ergebnisse des regelbasierten Modells before. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 33:173–183.Google Scholar
- 24.S.F. Railsback and B.C. Harvey (2002) Analysis of habitat selection rules using an individual-based model. Ecology, 83:1817–1830.Google Scholar
- 25.S.F. Railsback, B.C. Harvey, R.H. Lamberson, D.E. Lee, N.J. Claasen, and S. Yoshihara (2002) Population-level analysis and validation of an individual-based cuthroat trout model. Natural Resource Modeling, 14:465–474.Google Scholar
- 28.H. Remmert (1991) The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems-an overview. In: H. Remmert, editor, The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems (Ecological Studies 85), pp. 1–21. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Google Scholar
- 31.H.H. Shugart (1984) A theory of forest dynamics: the ecological implications of forest succession models. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- 33.J. Watson (1968) The double helix: a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Atheneum, New York.Google Scholar