Finite Element Modelling of Soil-Vegetation Interaction

  • Buddhima Indraratna
  • Behzad Fatahi
  • Hadi Khabbaz
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics 113 book series (SPPHY, volume 113)


Behaviour of soils in the vadose zone is closely linked to water balance between ground and atmosphere. It seems that transpiration is the most uncertain and difficult to evaluate of all the terms in the soil water balance. The key variable to estimate the transpiration rate is the rate of root water uptake, which depends on the hydrological, geological and meteorological conditions. A mathematical model for the rate of root water uptake incorporating the root growth rate, ground conditions, type of vegetation and climatic parameters, has been developed. A conical shape is considered to represent the geometry of the tree root zone. Using this proposed model, the distribution of moisture and the matric suction profile adjacent to the tree are numerically analysed. Field measurements taken from literature published previously are compared with the authors’ numerical model. The predicted results obtained from the numerical analysis, compared favourably with the field measurements, justifying the assumptions upon which the model was developed. The analysis also indicates that soil suction and settlement increase over the time, with the effect being more significant in the first stages of transpiration.

Key words

matric suction settlement root water uptake transpiration finite element interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almeida MSS, Britto AM, Parry RHG (1986) Numerical modelling of a centrifuged embankment on soft clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 23(2):103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biddle PG (1998) Tree Root Damage to Buildings. Willowmead Publishing Ltd., WantageGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress, Teknish Ukebadk 106(39):859–863Google Scholar
  4. Blight GE (1997) Interactions between the atmosphere and the earth, Geotechnique 42(4):715–766Google Scholar
  5. Blight GE (2003) The vadose-zone soil-water balance and transpiration rates of vegetation, Geotechnique 53(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg H, Grimes DW (1986) Depth Development of Roots with Time: An Empirical Description, Trans ASAE 29(1):194–197Google Scholar
  7. Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media, Colorado, U.S.A., Colorado State University, Report No.3Google Scholar
  8. Fatahi B., Indraratna B (2006) A Case Study and Pilot Parametric Study on the Effect of Root-Based Suction on Ground Behaviour, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering (submitted)Google Scholar
  9. Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H (1978) Simulation of field water use and crop yield, Simulation Monograph, Pudoc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  10. Fredlund DG, Morgenstern NR (1977) Stress State Variables for Unsaturated Soils, ASCE J Geotech Div 103(5):447–466Google Scholar
  11. Gerwitz A, Page ER (1974) An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems, Journal of Applied Ecology 11:773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Indraratna B, Fatahi B, Khabbaz H (2006) Numerical analysis of matric suction effects of tree roots, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering 159(2):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khabbaz H (1997) An effective stress theory based numerical model for flow and deformation in unsaturated soils. PhD Thesis, University of NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Khalili N, Geiser F, Blight GE (2004) Effective stress in unsaturated soils: review with new evidence, International Journal of Geomechanics 4(2):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landsberg JJ (1999) The Way Trees Use Water, Water and Salinity Issues in Agroforestry No. 5, RIRDC Publication No. 99/37, Australia 1–24Google Scholar
  16. Nelson JD, Miller DJ (1992) Expansive Soils, Problems and Practice in Foundation and Pavement Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Ng CWW (1998) Observed performance of multopropped excavation in stiff clay, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124(9):889–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raudkivi AJ (1979) Hydrology. Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Samuels SG (1975) Some properties of the Gault Clay from Ely-Ouse Essex water tunnel, Geotechnique 25(2):239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider WH, Hairsh SR, Compton HR, Burgess AE, Wrobel JG (2002) Analysis of hydrologic data to evaluate phytoremediation system performance, Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compoind, Battelle Press, Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  21. Shen JM (1998) Soil Suction in relation to slope stability: A summary of research carried out in Honh Kong in 1978–1997, Proceeding of the annual seminar on slope engineering in Hong Kong 93–99Google Scholar
  22. Smith GN, Smith IGN (2004) Elements of Soil Mechanics. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Standards Australia (1996) Residential slabs and footings construction, AS2870–1996Google Scholar
  24. Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., U.S.A.Google Scholar
  25. Uniform Building Code (1997) International Building Code. International Code Council, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  26. Zapata CE, Houston WN, Houston SL, Walsh KD (2000) Soil-water characteristic curve variability. In: Shackeford et al. (eds) Advances in unsaturated geotechnics. GEO-Institute, ASCE, U.S.A. 84–124Google Scholar
  27. Zhang LL, Fredlund DG, Zhang LM, Tang WH (2004) Numerical study of soil conditions under which matric suction can be maintained, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41(4):569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Buddhima Indraratna
    • 1
  • Behzad Fatahi
    • 1
  • Hadi Khabbaz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil, Mining and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations