Surface based hypothesis verification in intensity images using geometric and appearance data

  • J. H. M. Byne
  • J. A. D. W. Anderson
Poster Session II
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1352)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss current work concerning Appearance-based and CAD-based vision; two opposing vision strategies. CAD-based vision is geometry based, reliant on having complete object centred models. Appearance-based vision builds view dependent models from training images. Existing CAD-based vision systems that work with intensity images have all used one and zero dimensional features, for example lines, arcs, points and corners. We describe a system we have developed for combining these two strategies. Geometric models are extracted from a commercial CAD library of industry standard parts. Surface appearance characteristics are then learnt automatically by observing actual object instances. This information is combined with geometric information and is used in hypothesis evaluation. This augmented description improves the systems robustness to texture, specularities and other artifacts which are hard to model with geometry alone, whilst maintaining the advantages of a geometric description.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Amadasun and R. King. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(5):1264–1274, September/October 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.G. Baumgart. A polyhedral representation for computer vision. In AFIPS National Computer Conference, pages 589–596, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Bhanu. CAD-based robot vision. IEEE Computer, pages 13–16, August 1987.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Brisdon. Hypothesis Verification using Iconic Matching. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK, November 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Brisdon, G.D. Sullivan, and K.D. Baker. Feature aggregation in iconic model evaluation. In Alvey Vision Conf., pages 19–24, Manchester, August 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H.M. Byne and J.A.D.W. Anderson. CAD-based vision. In IEE Colloquium on Industrial Inspection, February 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Foley, A. van Dam, S.K. Feiner, and J.F. Hughes. Computer Graphics-Principles And Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Crewe and A.C. Kak. Interactive learning of a multiple-attribute hash table classifer for fast object recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(3):387–416, May 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.G. Hoel. ELementary Statistics. John Wiley, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.G. Kendall and W.R. Buckland. A Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Longman, London, fourth edition, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. M-Rouhani, A.D. Worrall, and J.A.D.W. Anderson. An interactive CAD-based vision system. In BMVC, pages 681–690, Birmingham, UK, September 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.J. Maybank, A.D. Worrall, and G.D. Sullivan. A filter for visual tracking based on a stochastic model of driver behaviour. In ECCV, Cambridge, UK, April 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Mundy, A. Liu, N. Pillow, A. Zisserman, S. Abdallah, S. Utcke, S. Nayar, and C. Rothwell. An experimental compasision of appearance and geometric model based recognition. Number 1144 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 247–269, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Murase and S.K. Nayar. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14(1):5–24, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Narendra and K. Fukunaga. A branch and bound algorithm for feature subset selection. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 26(9):917–922, September 1977.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.P. Pentland. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Trans. of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):661–673, November 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Pudil, J. Novovičová, and J. Kittler. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, pages 1119–1125, November 1994.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K.V. Ramana and B. Ramamoorthy. Statistical methods to compare the texture features of machined surfaces. Pattern Recognition, 29(9):1447–1459, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    SDRC I-DEAS master series. 2000 Eastman Drive, Milford, Ohio 45150, USA.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.D. Worrall, J.M. Ferryman, G.D. Sullivan, and K.D. Baker. Pose and struture recovery using active models. In BMVC, pages 137–146, Birmingham, UK, September 1995.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.D. Worrall, F.R. Marslin, G.D. Sullivan, and K.D. Baker. Model based tracking. In BMVC, pages 310–318, Glasgow, UK, September 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. M. Byne
    • 1
  • J. A. D. W. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceUniversity of ReadingBerksUK

Personalised recommendations