Advertisement

Information extraction: Techniques and challenges

  • Ralph Grishman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1299)

Keywords

Extraction System Noun Phrase Information Extraction Syntactic Structure International Joint Venturis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Proceedings of the Third Message Understanding Conference (MUC-3). Morgan Kaufmann, May 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Proceedings of the Fourth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-4). Morgan Kaufmann, June 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Proceedings of the Fifth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-5), Baltimore, MD, August 1993. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Douglas Appelt, Jerry Hobbs, John Bear, David Israel, Megumi Kameyama, Andy Kehler, David Martin, Karen Meyers, and Mabry Tyson. SRI International FASTUS system: MUC-6 test results and analysis. In Proc. Sixth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douglas Appelt, Jerry Hobbs, John Bear, David Israel, and Mabry Tyson. FASTUS: A finite-state processor for information extraction from real-world text. In Proc. 13th Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (LJCAI-93), pages 1172–1178, August 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amit Bagga and Alan Biermann. Analyzing the performance of message understanding systems. Technical Report CS-1997-01, Dept. of Computer Science, Duke University, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel Bikel, Scott Miller, Richard Schwartz, and Ralph Weischedel. Nymble: a high-performance learning name-finder. In Proc. Fifth Applied Natural Language Processing Conf., Washington, DC, April 1997. Assn. for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michael Collins. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. In Proc. 34th Annual Meeting Assn. Computational Linguistics, pages 184–191, Santa Cruz, CA, June 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    David Fisher, Stephen Soderland, Joseph McCarthy, Fangfang Feng, and Wendy Lehnert. Description of the UMass system as used for MUC-6. In Proc. Sixth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ralph Grishman. The NYU system for MUC-6 or where's the syntax? In Proc. Sixth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ralph Grishman, Catherine Macleod, and Adam Meyers. Comlex Syntax: Building a computational lexicon. In Proc. 15th Int'l Conf. Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), pages 268–272, Kyoto, Japan, August 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ralph Grishman, Catherine Macleod, and John Sterling. New York University: Description of the Proteus System as used for MUC-4. In Proc. Fourth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-4), pages 233–241, McLean, VA, June 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ralph Grishman and Beth Sundheim. Message Understanding Conference — 6: A brief history. In Proc. 16th Int'l Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING 96), Copenhagen, August 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    George Krupka. SRA: Description of the SRA system as used for MUC-6. In Proc. Sixth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Lehnert, C. Cardie, D. Fisher, J. McCarthy, E. Riloff, and S. Soderland. University of Massachusetts: MUC-4 test results and analysis. In Proc. Fourth Message Understanding Conf., McLean, VA, June 1992. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Lehnert, C. Cardie, D. Fisher, E. Riloff, and R. Williams. University of Massachusetts: Description of the CIRCUS system as used for MUC-3. In Proc. Third Message Understanding Conf., San Diego, CA, May 1991. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    David Magerman. Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. In Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting Assn. Computational Linguistics, pages 276–283, Cambridge, MA, June 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ellen Riloff. Automatically constructing a dictionary for information extraction tasks. In Proc. 11th Annl. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pages 811–816, 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naomi Sager, Carol Friedman, and Margaret Lyman. Medical Language Processing. Computer Management of Narrative Data. Addison Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Soderland, D. Fisher, J. Aseltine, and W. Lenhert. CRYSTAL: Inducing a conceptual dictionary. In Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), pages 1314–1319, Montreal, Canada, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ralph Weischedel. BBN: Description of the PLUM system as used for MUC-6. In Proc. Sixth Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-6), Columbia, MD, November 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Grishman
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations