On the power of simple diagrams

  • Roberto Di Cosmo
Regular Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1103)

Abstract

In this paper we focus on a set of abstract lemmas that are easy to apply and turn out to be quite valuable in order to establish confluence and/or normalization modularly, especially when adding rewriting rules for extensional equalities to various calculi. We show the usefulness of the lemmas by applying them to various systems, ranging from simply typed lambda calculus to higher order lambda calculi, for which we can establish systematically confluence and/or normalization (or decidability of equality) in a simple way. Many result are new, but we also discuss systems for which our technique allows to provide a much simpler proof than what can be found in the literature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Akama. On Mints' reductions for ccc-Calculus. In TLCA, n. 664 in LNCS, pages 1–12. Springer Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Barbanera. Combining term-rewriting and type-assignment systems. In 3rd It. Conf. on TCS, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Barbanera, M. Fernandez, and H. Geuvers. Modularity of strong normalization and confluence in the algebraic-λ-cube. In LICS, Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Barendregt. The Lambda Calculus; Its syntax and Semantics (revised edition). North Holland, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bellè. Syntactical properties of an extension of girard's system f where types can be taken as “generic” inputs. 1995. Available as ftp://idefix.disi.unige.it/pub/gbelle/systemFC.ps.Z.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Breazu-Tannen. Combining algebra and higher order types. In LICS, pages 82–90, July 1988.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Breazu-Tannen and J. Gallier. Polymorphic rewriting preserves algebraic strong normalization. TCS, 83:3–28, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Breazu-Tannen and J. Gallier. Polymorphic rewiting preserves algebraic confluence. Inf. and Comp., 114:1–29, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cubric. On free CCC. Distributed on the types mailing list, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.-L. Curien and R. Di Cosmo. A confluent reduction system for the λ-calculus with surjective pairing and terminal object. JFP, 1995. To appear. A preliminary version appeared in ICALP 91.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Di Cosmo and D. Kesner. Simulating expansions without expansions. MSCS, 4:1–48, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Di Cosmo and D. Kesner. Combining algebraic rewriting, extensional lambda calculi and fixpoints. TCS, 1995. To appear.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Di Cosmo and D. Kesner. Rewriting with polymorphic extensional λ-calculus. In CSL'95 (extended abstract), 1995. Full version accepted for CSL95 Proceedings, to appear in 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Di Cosmo and A. Piperno. Expanding extensional polymorphism. In M. Dezani-Ciancaglini and G. Plotkin, editors, TLCA, volume 902 of LNCS, pages 139–153, Apr. 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. J. Dougherty. Some lambda calculi with categorical sums and products. In RTA, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Gallier. On Girard's “Candidats de Reductibilité”, pages 123–203. Logic and Computer Science. Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Geser. Relative termination. Dissertation, Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik, Universität Passau, Germany, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Ghani. βη-equality for coproducts. In M. Dezani-Ciancaglini and G. Plotkin, editors, TLCA, volume 902 of LNCS, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Ghani. Extensionality and polymorphism. University of Edimburgh, Submitted, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.-Y. Girard, Y. Lafont, and P. Taylor. Proofs and Types. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Huet Résolution d'équations dans les langages d'ordre 1, 2,..., ω. Thèse d'Etat, Université Paris VII, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. B. Jay and N. Ghani. The Virtues of Eta-expansion. JFP, 5(2):135–154, Apr. 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Longo, K. Milsted, and S. Soloviev. The Genericity Theorem and effective Parametricity in Polymorphic lambdacalculus. TCS, 121:323–349, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Mints. Teorija categorii i teoria dokazatelstv.I. Aktualnye problemy logiki i metodologii nauky, pages 252–278, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Okada. Strong normalizability for the combined system of the types lambda calculus and an arbitrary convergent term rewrite system. In Symp. Symb. and Alg. Comp., 1989.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. Tannen, P. Buneman, and L. Wong. Naturally embedded query languages. In 4th Int. Conf. on Database Theory, n. 646 in LNCS, 1992. Available as ftp://www.cis.upenn.edu/pub/papers/db-research/icdt92.dvi.Z.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. van Oostrom. Developing developments. Draft, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Wong. Querying nested collections. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1994. Available as ftp://www.cis.upenn.edu/pub/papers/db-research/limsoonphd.ps.Z.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Di Cosmo
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Normale SupérieureDMI-LIENS (CNRS URA 1327)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations