Advertisement

The development of a virtual world for learning newtonian mechanics

  • Christopher J. Dede
  • Marilyn Salzman
  • R. Bowen Loftin
3 New Technologies for Virtual Reality
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1077)

Abstract

We are collaboratively designing “ScienceSpace,” a collection of virtual worlds designed to explore the potential utility of physical immersion and multisensory perception to enhance science education. This paper describes the creation and formative evaluation of NewtonWorld, a virtual environment for investigating the kinematics and dynamics of one-dimensional motion. Through this research, we are developing design heuristics, assessment methodologies, and insights about multisensory learning generalizable to a wide range of educational environments. We are also gaining an understanding the strengths and weaknesses of virtual reality as a vehicle for learning.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Virtual Environment Virtual World Haptic Feedback Multimodal Interface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blicken, M. & Byrne, C. M. (1993) Summer students in virtual reality. In Wexelblat, A. (ed.), Virtual Reality: Applications and Exploration. New York: Academic Press, Inc. 199–218.Google Scholar
  2. Clement, J. (1982) Students' Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics 50, 66–71.Google Scholar
  3. Dede, C. (1995) The Evolution of Constructivist Learning Environments: Immersion in Distributed, Virtual Worlds. Educational Technology 35, 5 (September–October), 46–52.Google Scholar
  4. Dede, C. (1993) Evolving from Multimedia to Virtual Reality. In H. Maurer (ed.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 123–130.Google Scholar
  5. Erickson, T. (1993) Artificial realities as data visualization environments. In Wexelblat, A. (Ed.) Virtual Reality: Applications and Explorations. New York: Academic Press Professional. 1–22.Google Scholar
  6. Frederiksen, J., & White, B. (1992) Mental models and understanding: a problem for science education. In Scanlon, E., & O'Shea, T. (eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology New York: Springer Verlag. 211–226/Google Scholar
  7. Fosnot, C. (1992) Constructing constructivism. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 167–176.Google Scholar
  8. Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a) The initial knowledge state of college students. American Journal of Physics 53, 1043–1055.Google Scholar
  9. Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b) Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics 53, 1056–1065.Google Scholar
  10. Kalawsky, R. S. (1993) The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Krueger, M. (1991) Artificial Reality II. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1984) Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow, R. E., & Farr, M. J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and instruction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. McDermott, L. C. (1991) Millikan lecture 1990: what we teach and what is learned — closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315.Google Scholar
  14. Papert, S. (1988) The conservation of Piaget: The computer as grist for the constructivist mill. In G. Foreman & P.B. Pufall (eds.), Constructivism in the computer age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 3–13.Google Scholar
  15. Perkins, D. (1991) Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology 31, 5 (May), 18–23.Google Scholar
  16. Piantanida, T., Boman, D. K., & Gille, J. (1993) Human perceptual issues and virtual reality. Virtual Reality Systems, 1 (1), 43–52.Google Scholar
  17. Pimentel, K., & Teixeira, K. (1993) Virtual Reality. Through the new looking glass. New York: Intel/Windcrest Books/ McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Regian, J. W., Shebilske, W., & Monk, J. (1992) A preliminary empirical evaluation of virtual reality as a training tool for visual-spatial tasks. Journal of Communication, 42, 136–149.Google Scholar
  19. Reif, F., & Larkin, J. (1991) Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 743–760.Google Scholar
  20. Salzman, M., Dede, C., and Loftin, B. (1995) Learner Centered Design of Sensorily Immersive Microworlds Using a Virtual Reality Interface. In J. Greer (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education. 554–564.Google Scholar
  21. Sherin, B., Disessa, A. A., & Hammer, D. M. (1993). Dynaturtle revisited: Learning physics through collaborative design of a computer model. Interactive Learning Environments, 3, 2, 91–118.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, R. B. (1987) Experiences with the alternate reality kit: an example of the tension between literalism and magic. In Proceedings of CHI+GI 1987. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 324–333Google Scholar
  23. Stuart, R., & Thomas, J. C. (1991) The implications of education in cyberspace. Multimedia Review, 2, 17–27.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, J. (1990). Through the Looking Glass. In B. Laurel (ed.), The art of computer-human interface design. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. 213–245.Google Scholar
  25. Wenzel, E. M. (1992) Localization in virtual acoustic displays. Presence, 1(1), 80–107.Google Scholar
  26. White, B. (1993) Thinkertools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1–100.Google Scholar
  27. Wickens, C. (1992) Virtual Reality and Education. IEEE Spectrum, 42–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Dede
    • 1
  • Marilyn Salzman
    • 1
  • R. Bowen Loftin
    • 2
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.University of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations