Path selection and route preference in human navigation: A progress report

  • Reginald G. Golledge
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 988)


Two critical characteristics of human wayfinding are destination choice and path selection. Traditionally, the path selection problem has been ignored or assumed to be the result of minimizing procedures such as selecting the shortest path, the quickest path or the least costly path. In this paper I draw on existing literature from cognitive mapping and cognitive distance, to define possible route selection criteria other than these traditional ones. Experiments with route selection on maps and in the field are then described and analyzed to determine which criteria appear to be used as the environment changes and as one increases the number of nodes along a path (i.e., as trip chaining replaces a simple Origin-Destination (O-D) pairing.


Route Choice Path Selection Route Selection Destination Choice Trip Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Church, R.L., and ReVelle, C.S. (1976) Theoretical and computational links between the p-median, location set-covering, and the maximal covering location problem. Geographical Analysis, 8, 406–415.Google Scholar
  2. Gärling, T., Böök, A., and Lindberg, E. (1984) Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: The interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environment and Behavior, 16, 3–34.Google Scholar
  3. Golledge, R.G. (1992) Place recognition and wayfinding: Making sense of space. Geoforum, 23, 2: 199–214.Google Scholar
  4. Golledge, R.G. (1995) Defining the Criteria Used in Path Selection. Paper presented to the International Conference on Activity Scheduling, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, May.Google Scholar
  5. Golledge, R.G., and Zannaras, G. (1973) Cognitive approaches to the analysis of human spatial behavior. In W.H. Ittelson (Ed.). Environment and cognition. New York: Seminar Press, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
  6. Kitchin, R.M. (1994) Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 1: 1–19.Google Scholar
  7. Lloyd, R., and Cammack, R. (1995) Constructing cognitive maps with orientation biases. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  8. Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N., and Fukusima, S.S. (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 4: 906–921.Google Scholar
  9. Montello, D.R. (1992) The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Mechanisms and information sources. Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  10. Sadalla, E.K., Burroughs, W.J., and Staplin, L.J. (1980) Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 516–528.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reginald G. Golledge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Research Unit in Spatial Cognition and ChoiceUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara

Personalised recommendations