COST237 1994: Multimedia Transport and Teleservices pp 256-273 | Cite as
Congestion avoidance for video over IP networks
Abstract
Video/Audio packet transport over IP (ver. 4) networks is not guaranteed for real-time communication if network congestion occurs due to excessive traffic load. Congestion avoidance control is thus necessary for real-time video/audio communication over IP networks. An adaptive video bit rate control scheme that detects the onset of congestion is designed to achieve real-time visual communication and efficient data transport. Congestion over a CSMA/CD LAN is detected from the number of retransmissions caused by collisions. The packet delay is used to detect congestion over connected LANs. The effectiveness of the adaptive video bit rate control scheme is verified in experiments that use a number of video/audio communication terminals and data terminals on IP networks. The interaction of the adaptive video bit rate control and TCP congestion control schemes are investigated and suitable bit rate control scheme is discussed. The adaptive bit rate control scheme expands the possibility of visual communication over IP networks.
Keywords
Congestion Control Packet Delay Round Trip Time Video Traffic Rate Control SchemePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]R. Gusella, “A Measurement Study of Diskless Workstation Traffic on an Ethernet”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 38, no. 9, Sept. 1990.Google Scholar
- [2]W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger and D. V. Wilson, “On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic,” In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '93 pp. 183–193, Sept., 1993.Google Scholar
- [3]W. E. Leland and D. V. Wilson, “ High Time-Resolution Measurement and Analysis of LAN Traffic: Implications for LAN Interconnection,” In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '91, Bal Harbour, FL, 1360–1366, 1991.Google Scholar
- [4]C. Topolcic, S. Casner, C, Lynn, P. Park and K. Schroder. Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, version 2 (ST-II), Internet RFC 1190, Oct., 1990.Google Scholar
- [5]L. Zhang, S. E. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker and D. Zappala, “RSVP: A New Resource Reservation Protocol,” IEEE Network, September, 1993.Google Scholar
- [6]H. Kanakia, P. P. Mishra and A. Reibman, “An Adaptive Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time Packet Video Transport”, In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '93, pp. 20–31, Sept., 1993.Google Scholar
- [7]Van Jacobson, “Congestion Avoidance and Control”, In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, pp. 314–329, Stanford, CA, August, 1988.Google Scholar
- [8]Michael Gilge and Riccardo Gusella, “Motion Video Coding for Packet-Switched Networks — An Integrated Approach”, In Proc S.P.I.E.: Visual Communication, pp. 592–602, Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
- [9]Luca Delgrossi, Christian Halstrick, Dietmar Hehmann, Ralf Guido Herrtwich, Oliver Krone, Josen Sandvoss and Carsten Vogt, “Media Scaling for Audiovisual Communication with the Heiderberg Transport System”, In Proc. ACM Multimedia 93, pp. 99–104, Jun. 1993.Google Scholar
- [10]Jean-Chrysostome Bolot, Thierry Turletti, “A Rate Control Mechanism for Packet Video in the Internet”, In Proc INFOCOM 94.Google Scholar
- [11]CCITT SG XV Document, “Considering on acceptable processing delay in the video codec”, Document AVC-85, 1 August 1991.Google Scholar
- [12]R. Yavatkar, L. Manoj, “Optimistic strategies for large-scale dissemination of multimedia information”, In Proc. ACM Multimedia '93, Anaheim, CA, pp. 1–8, Aug. 1993.Google Scholar
- [13]T. Sakatani, N. Kanemaki, T. Arikawa and K. Shimamura, “Visual Communication Schemes using CSMA/CD LANs”, In Proc IWACA '92, pp. 393–399, Munich, March, 1992.Google Scholar
- [14]T. Sakatani and T. Tajiri, “A Video/Audio Packet Transmission System over LANs”, In Proc the 5 th International Workshop on Packet Video, Berlin, March 1993.Google Scholar