Managing shared ephemeral teleconferencing state: Policy and mechanism

  • Scott Shenker
  • Abel Weinrib
  • Eve Schooler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 882)


In recent years there has been dramatic progress on the enabling technologies for workstation-based multimedia teleconferencing applications. We expect that such applications will soon become an important component of many future social and business interactions. Teleconferencing applications have aspects of their state, such as membership, types of media being used, and encryption, that are under joint control. Much of this state is ephemeral, in that it is of importance only for the duration of a session, and does not have importance outside of the session itself. In this paper we focus on the specification and realization of policies for managing this shared ephemeral teleconferencing state. We first define a broad family of policies which has three dimensions: initiation, voting, and consistency. We then present a mechanism that implements this family of policies for two different communication models.


Vote Rule Multicast Group Shared State Change Operation Joint Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Demers, D. Greene, C. Hauser, W. Irish, J. Larson, H. Sturgis, S. Shenker, D. Swinehart, and D. Terry, “Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance,” Proc. of 6th ACM Symp. on Principles of Dist. Comp., pp. 1–12, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arango et al., “The Touring Machine System,” Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 36, pp. 68–77, Jan. 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Mak, “Session Management for Distributed Multimedia Applications,” Proc. 5th IEEE COMSOCC Int'l Wkshp. on Multimedia '94, Kyoto, Japan, May 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.R. Ahuja and J.R. Ensor, “Coordination and Control of Multimedia Conferencing,” IEEE Comm., Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 33–43, May 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.M. Vin, B.C. Swinehart, P.T. Zellweger, P.V. Rangan, “Multimedia Conferencing in the Etherphone Environment,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 69–79, Oct. 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Altenhofen et al., “The BERKOM Multimedia Collaboration Service,” Proc. ACM Multimedia 93, pp. 457–463, Aug. 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.M. Schooler, “Case Study: Multimedia Conference Control in a Packet-switched Teleconferencing System,” J. of Internetworking: Research and Experience, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 99–120, June 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Turletti, “H.261 Software Codec for Videoconferencing over the Internet”, Research Report 1834, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Sophia-Antipolis, France, Jan. 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Casner, S. Deering, “First IETF Internet Audiocast”, ACM Sigcomm Comp. Comm. Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 92–97, July 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Shenker
    • 1
  • Abel Weinrib
    • 2
  • Eve Schooler
    • 3
  1. 1.XEROX PARCPalo Alto
  2. 2.BellcoreMorristown
  3. 3.USC/Information Sciences Inst.Marina del Rey

Personalised recommendations