Advertisement

On the approximation of finding various minimal, maximal, and consistent sequences

  • Martin Middendorf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 834)

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the complexity of finding various kinds of common super- and subsequences with respect to one or two given sets of strings. We show how these problems can be related to finding sequences having a fixed character composition. This leads to a unified approach for characterizing the complexity of such problems. Moreover, we derive interesting results on the approximability of problems which are dual to the well known Shortest Common Supersequence and Longest Common Subsequence problems.

Keywords

Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme Longe Common Subsequence Consistent Sequence Longe Common Subsequence Binary Alphabet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, R. Sundan, M. Szegedy, Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems, in: Proc. 33rd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1992) 14–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Jiang, M. Li, On the complexity of learning strings and supersequences, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 119 (1993) 336–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Maier, The complexity of some problems on subsequences and supersequences, J. ACM. 25 (1978), 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Middendorf, The shortest common nonsubsequence Problem is NP-complete, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 108 (1993), 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Papadimitriou, M. Yannakakis, Optimization, Approximation and Complexity Classes, 20th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, (1988) 229–234.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Pitt, L.G. Valiant, Computational limitations on learning from examples. J. ACM. 35 (1988) 965–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.-J. Räihä, E. Ukkonen, The shortest common supersequence problem over binary alphabet is NP-complete. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 16 (1981) 187–198.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. G. Timkovsky, Complexity of common subsequence and supersequence problems and related problems, Cybernetics 25 (1990), 565–580.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.G. Valiant, A theory of the learnable. Comm. ACM. 27 (1984) 1134–1142.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Zhang, The Approximation of Longest Common Non-Supersequences and Shortest Common Non-Subsequences is Hard, submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Middendorf
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Angewandte Informatik und Formale BeschreibungsverfahrenUniversität KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations