Shape models from image sequences

  • Xinquan Shen
  • David Hogg
Ego-Motion and 3D Recovery
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 800)


This paper describes an adaptive method for the recovery of 3-D shape models from sequences of images. A 3-D surface model, initialised to be spherical, is progressively deformed under the action of simulated external forces arising from the profile of the target object in successive images, obtained using a low-level motion segmentation algorithm. Intrinsic constraints encourage the model to deform smoothly and to remain symmetrical about a vertical plane parallel to the direction of motion.


  1. 1.
    P. J. Besl and R. C. Jain. Three-dimensional Object Recognition. ACM Computing Surveys, 17(1):75–145, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. T. Chin. Model-based Recognition in Robot Vision. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(1):67–108, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Hogg. Shape in Machine Vision. Image and Vision Computing Journal, 2(6):309–316, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. Shen and D. Hogg. Shape models from image sequences. Technical Report Report 93.37, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, October 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Hogg, D. Young, and L-Q Xu. Statistical Regularity in Motion Sequences. Technical report, School of Computer Studies, The University of Leeds, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. M. Bolle and B. C. Vemuri. On Three-dimensional Surface Reconstruction Methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-11(1):1–13, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Terzopoulos, A. Witkin, and M. Kass. Constraints on Deformable Models: Recovering 3D Shape and Nonrigid Motion. Artificial Intelligence, 36(1):91–123, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Terzopoulos and D. Metaxas. Dynamic 3D Model with Local and Global Deformations: Deformable Superquadrics. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 90), pages 606–615, Osaka, Japan, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Pentland and S. Sclaroff. Closed-form Solution for Physically Based Shape Modelling and Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-13(7):715–729, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Gupta and C. Liang. 3-D Model-data Correspondence and Nonrigid Deformation. In CVPR'93, pages 756–757, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Terzopoulos and A. Witkin. Physically-based Models with Rigid and Deformable Components. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 8(6):41–51, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinquan Shen
    • 1
  • David Hogg
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer StudiesThe University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations