Advertisement

An intelligent interface for computer assisted language learning

  • Eve Wilson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 753)

Abstract

This paper begins by contrasting teacher directed computer assisted language learning with the student directed approaches of recent hypertext learning programmes. It concludes that what is needed is an approach where the level and order of the exercises can be tailored to the needs and requirements of individual students. To do this requires:
  1. 1.

    a means of constructing an original user profile and of updating this in the light of student performance in the tutorial exercises, and

     
  2. 2.

    a means of generating exercises of an appropriate level from text databases.

     

The paper next looks at how texts may be automatically assigned a readability grade based on Gunning's Fog Index or Information Density, and how this can be used to generate exercises of varying levels of difficulty. The paper emphasises the importance of giving students feedback to win their co-operation in devising and adhering to a tuition programme. It concludes by discussing the work still to be done.

Keywords

Information Density Text Sample Readability Grade Subordinate Clause Text Database 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

References

  1. 1.
    Howe, T., The development of a computerised system to aid the assessment of the readability and cohesion of text, Project Report, University of Kent at Canterbury, (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kearsley, G. P., & Hillelsohn, M. J., “Human factors considerations for computerbased training”, Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 8(4), pp. 74–84, (1982)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romiszowski, A. J., Designing instructional systems, Kogan Page, London, (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Skinner, B. F., “Teaching machines”, Scientific American, (November 1961), pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsutsumi, M., Implementation of hypertoefi, Project Report, University of Kent, (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson, E., Lindley, I., and Pullen, S., “CALLGUIDE: using programmable hypertext as a shell for CALL programs” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computers and Learning, Acadia, (June 1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson, E., “The language learner and the computer: modes of interaction”, ACH/ALLC Joint International Conference, Washington, DC, (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing LaboratoryUniversity of Kent at CanterburyCanterburyEngland

Personalised recommendations