VCHCI 1993: Human Computer Interaction pp 315-328 | Cite as

Natural training wheels: Learning and transfer between two versions of a computer application

  • Marita Franzke
  • John Rieman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 733)

Abstract

Users of personal computers must deal with frequent major upgrades of software packages. Major upgrades typically provide increased functionality without changing the conceptual framework of the program, but they may force the user to learn how to use new menus, dialog boxes, and other controls. We suggest that early versions of a program provide a natural training wheels environment, in which novice users can learn a program's basic operation while avoiding potential confusion caused by advanced features. Experiments with two versions of a graphing program confirm this hypothesis, with some restrictions.

Keywords

Transfer Time Graph Task Diary Study Learning Time Sample Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R. (1993) Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carroll, J.M. (1990). The Nürnberg Funnel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll, J.M., and Rosson, M.B. (1987). The paradox of the active user. In J.M. Carroll (ed.), Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 80–111.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ericsson, K.A., and Simon, H.A. (1984). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitajima, M., and Polson, P.G. (1992) A computational model of skilled use of a graphical user interface. Proceedings of CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 241–249.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polson, P.G. (1987). A quantitative theory of human-computer interaction. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polson, P.G. and Lewis, C.H. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 191–220.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rieman, John (1993). The diary study: A workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. Proceedings of InterCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 321–326.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singley, M.K., and Anderson, J.R. (1989). The Transfer of Cognitive Skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marita Franzke
    • 1
  • John Rieman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations