Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 706)
The experimental paradigm in software engineering
KeywordsSoftware Engineering Software Engineer Software Engineering Research Closed Loop Process Advance Computer Study
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- V. R. Basili, “Quantitative Evaluation of Software Engineering Methodology,” Proc. of the First Pan Pacific Computer Conference, Melbourne, Australia, September 1985.Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, “Software Development: A Paradigm for the Future”, Proceedings, 13th Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Keynote Address, Orlando, FL, September 1989Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, “The Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm”, white paper, University of Maryland, 1990.Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, G. Caldiera, F. McGarry, R. Pajerski, G. Page, S. Waligora, “The Software Engineering Laboratory — an Operational Software Experience Factory”, International Conference on Software Engineering, May, 1992, pp. 370–381.Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, H. D. Rombach “The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-14, no. 6, June 1988, pp. 758–773.Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, R. W. Selby, Jr., “Data Collection and Analysis in Software Research and Management,” Proc. of the American Statistical Association and Biomeasure Society Joint Statistical Meetings, Philadelphia, PA, August 13–16, 1984.Google Scholar
- V. R. Basili, R. W. Selby, D. H. Hutchens, “Experimentation in Software Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.SE-12, no.7, July 1986, pp.733–743.Google Scholar
- NSF Report on Research in Software Engineering — unpublished.Google Scholar
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993