Apport du style linguistique à la modélisation cognitive d'un elève

  • M. P. Daniel
  • L. Nicaud
  • V. Prince
  • M. P. Péry-Woodley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 608)


In the context of an intelligent tutoring system dedicated to definition control (these definitions had been already learnt by students from lectures), this paper addresses more particularly the building of a cognitive profile, on which a dialogue strategy between the system and the student will be based. Among the elements involved in the cognitive profile building, we focus on the information emerging from the linguistic form spontaneously adopted by the student, while giving his/her definition in unconstrained natural language. From two studies on real collected corpora, this contribution draws conclusions aboutthe relevant clues that will allow the system to choose a strategy adapted to the student.


Style Cognitif Clause Relative Intelligent Tutoring System Dialogue Strategy Type Extensif 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.P Daniel: Modélisation cognitive de l'apprenant selon son expression langagière Rapport de DEA Sciences Cognitives, Université Paris 11, Septembre 91Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Gaonac'h: La mémoire: variabilité inter et intra-individuelles, in Reuchlin 90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Hunt: Intelligence as an information-processing concept, British Journal of Psychology, 1980, N∘ 71.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Huteau: Style cognitif et personnalité. La dépendance-indépendance à l'égard du champ, Lille, Presses universitaires de Lille, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Lamontagne: Vers une pratique du profil d'apprentissage, IRPA, Québec, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Lautrey: Structures et fonctionnements cognitifs, thèse d'Université, Paris 5, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Nicaud., V. Prince: TEDDI: An ITS for Definitions Learning, PRICAI'90, pp.877–882, Nagoya, Japon, Novembre 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Nicaud, V. Prince: Modélisation du niveau d'abstraction d'un apprenant dans un tuteur contrôlant l'acquisition des définitions de concepts abstraits, RFIA, Lyon, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.P Péry-Woodley: Textual clues for user modeling in an ITS. Thesis for the degree of Master in Cognitive Science, University of Manchester, Sept 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Prince: Notes sur l'évaluation de la réponse dans TEDDI, LIMSI, Nov 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Schneuwly, M-C. Rosat, J. Dolz: Les organisateurs textuels dans quatre types de textes écrits (élèves de 10,12 et 14 ans). Langue Française N∘ 81, pp 40–58, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Self: Student models: what use are they ? IFIP/TC3 Frascati, Mai 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Daniel
    • 1
  • L. Nicaud
    • 2
  • V. Prince
    • 2
  • M. P. Péry-Woodley
    • 3
  1. 1.IUTOrsayFrance
  2. 2.LIMSIOrsayFrance
  3. 3.UMISTManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations