Advertisement

Instructional expertise

  • Kris Van Marcke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 608)

Abstract

The paper argues that instructional knowledge can to a large extend be modelled generically and re-applied in a variety of different teaching applications. This generic model is based on three concepts: instructional tasks, instructional methods and instructional objects. It is shown by means of a prototype Generic Tutoring Environment (GTE) how these components can be the building blocks of an instructional knowledge base and how this instructional knowledge base can support instructional interaction with a student.

Keywords

Instructional Method Intelligent Tutor System French Revolution Instructional Program Instructional Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Reiser, B.J. (1985) “Intelligent Tutoring Systems”, in: Science 228, p. 456–462.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cerri, S.A. (1989) “ALICE: Acquisition of Linguistic Items in the Context of Examples” Instructional Science 18. Kluwers Academic Publishers. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clancey, W. (1987), “Methodology for Building an Intelligent Tutoring System”, in: G.P. Kearsley (Cur.) Artificial Intelligence & Instruction: Applications and methods (Addison-Wesley, Reading. 1987) 193–227.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillenbourg, P. (1989) “Designing a self-improving tutor: PROTO-TEG. Instructional Science. 18, 193–216.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodyear, P. (1988) “Approaches to the empirical derivation of teaching knowledge for intelligent tutoring systems. Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-88), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McIntyre, A. (1991), “Representation of author's courseware models”, presented at NATO Advanced Research Workshop on “Authoring Environments for Computerbased Courseware, Maratea, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merrill, M.D. & Li, Z. (1990) An instructional design expert system. In: S. Dijkstra, B.H.A.M. van Hout Wolters & P.C. van der Sijde (Eds), Research on instruction: Design and effects (pp. 21–44). Englewood Cliffs; NJ: Educational technology.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steels, L. (1990) “Components of Expertise”, in AI Magazine”, vol. 11. no.2, Summer 1990, (also VUB AI-Memo 89-2)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Marcke, K. (1987), “KRS: An object-oriented representation language”, in Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, vol. 1, nr. 4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Marcke, K. (1990) “A Generic Tutoring Environment” In proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Marcke, K. (1991) “A Generic Task Model for Instruction” In Nato Advanced Research Workshop on Instructional design models for computer-based learning environments, Twente, July 1–4, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yazdani, M. (1987) “Intelligent Tutoring Systems: an overview”, in: R. W. Lawler, M. Yazdani (Cur.) Artificial intelligence and education Volume One Learning Environments and Tutoring Systems (Ablex Publishing, Norwood) 183–201.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wasson, B. (1990). “Determining the Focus of Instruction: Content Planning for Intelligent Tutoring Systems” Ph.D. Thesis. Laboratory for Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems, University of Saskattchewan, Saskatoon, SK. Canada.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woolf, B. P. (1987), Theoretical Frontiers in Building a Machine Tutor, in: G.P. Kearsley (Cur.) Artificial Intelligence & Instruction: Applications and methods (Addison-Wesley. Reading) 229–267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kris Van Marcke
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Technologies N.V.BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations