Advertisement

Some pronominalization issues in generation of texts in romance languages

  • Laurence Danlos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 377)

Keywords

Relative Clause Direct Object Personal Pronoun Main Clause Romance Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Danlos, L., 1985, Génération automatique de textes en langues naturelles, Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Danlos, L., 1987a, The linguistic basis of text generation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Danlos, L., 1987b, A French and English Syntactic Component for Generation, Natural Language Generation: New results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics, Kempen G. ed, Dortrecht/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Danlos, L., Namer, F., 1988, Morphology and cross dependencies in the synthesis of personal pronouns in Romance languages, Proceedings of COLING-88, Budapest.Google Scholar
  5. Elia, A., Martinelli, M., D'Agostino, E., 1981, Lessico e strutture sintattiche. Introduzione alla sintassi del verbo italiano, Napoli Liguori, Napoli.Google Scholar
  6. Gross, M., 1968, Grammaire transformationnelle du français: syntaxe du verbe, Larousse, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Gross, M., 1975, Méthodes en syntaxe, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Gross, M., 1986, Lexicon-Grammar, The Representation of Compound Words, in Proceedings of Coling '86,11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bonn.Google Scholar
  9. Hirst, G., 1981, Discourse oriented Anaphora resolution, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 7, no 2.Google Scholar
  10. Lancel, J.M., Otani, M., Simonin, N., Danlos, L., 1988, Sentence Parsing and Generation with a Semantic Dictionary and a Lexicon-Grammar, in Proceedings of Coling'88, Budapest.Google Scholar
  11. McKeown, K., 1985, Text generation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Reinhart, T., 1983, Anaphora and semantic interpretation, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  13. Sidner, C., 1981, Focusing for Interpretation of Pronouns, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 7, no 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence Danlos
    • 1
  1. 1.LADL, Université de Paris 7Paris Cedex 07

Personalised recommendations