Advertisement

Fuzzy Utilities Comparison in Multicriteria Analysis

  • Hepu Deng
  • Chung-Hsing Yen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1625)

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach for comparing fuzzy utilities in fuzzy multicriteria analysis. The approach developed combines the merit of two prominent concepts individually used in the existing methods: the fuzzy reference set and the degree of dominance. The decisive information of the fuzzy utilities being compared is sensibly used. The computation involved is simple, and the underlying concepts are logically sound and comprehensible. The comparative study conducted on benchmark cases in the literature shows that the approach compares favorably with other methods examined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bass, S.M. and Kwakernaak, H.: Rating and Ranking of Multiple-Aspect Alternatives Using Fuzzy Sets. Automatica 13 (1977) 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bortolan, G. and Degani, R.: A Review of Some Methods for Ranking Fuzzy Subsets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 15 (1985) 1–19.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, S.H.: Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set. Fuzzy Sets Sys 17 (1985) 113–129.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, S.J. and Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York (1992).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain, R.: Decisionmaking in the Presence of Fuzzy Variables. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. SMC-6 (1976) 698–703.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain, R.: A Procedure for Multi-Aspect Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets. J. Syst Sci 8 (1977) 1–7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kerre, E.E.: The Use of Fuzzy Set Theory in Electrocardiological Diagnostics. In: Gupta, M.M. and Sanchez, E. (eds.): Approximating Reasoning in Decision Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982) 277–282.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, E.S. and Li, R.J.: Comparison of Fuzzy Numbers Based on the Probability Measure of Fuzzy Events. Computer and Mathematics with Applications 15 (1987) 887–896.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murakami, S., Maeda, S., and Imamura, S.: Fuzzy Decision Analysis on the Development of Centralized Regional Energy Control System. Proc. IFAC Symposium on Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis (1983) 363–368.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakamura, K.: Preference Relation on a Set of Fuzzy Utilities as a Basis for Decision Making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20 (1986) 147–162.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tong, R.M. and Bonissone, P. P.: Linguistic Solutions to Fuzzy Decision Problems. TIMES/Studies in the Management Sciences 20 (1984) 323–334.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tseng, T.Y. and Klein, CM.: New Algorithm for the Ranking Procedure in Fuzzy Decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet 19 (1989) 1289–1296.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson, S.R., Weiss, J.J., and Donnell, M.L.: Fuzzy Decision Analysis. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. SMC-9 (1979) 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yager, R.R.: Ranking Fuzzy Subsets over the Unit Interval. Proc. CDC (1978) 1435–1437.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yager, R.R.: On Choosing between Fuzzy Subsets. Cybernetics 9 (1980) 151–154.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hepu Deng
    • 1
  • Chung-Hsing Yen
    • 2
  1. 1.Gippsland School of Computing and Information TechnologyMonash UniversityChurchillAustralia
  2. 2.School of Business SystemsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations