Combining sedimentation velocity with SEC-MALLS to probe the molecular structure of heterogeneous macromolecular systems that cannot be preparatively separated: application to three rice starches

  • T. Tongdang
  • H. F. J. Bligh
  • K. Jumel
  • S. E. Harding
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science book series (PROGCOLLOID, volume 113)

Abstract

A combined approach using sedimentation velocity in the Beckman Optima XL-I ultracentrifuge together with high performance size exclusion chromatography coupled to multiangle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS) was used to assess the molecular structure of rice amylose from three different rice starches without pre-separation by preparative means. The amylose content of the rice starches was analysed by the iodo-colorimetric method. We found for the three species of amylose starch studied (Thaibonnet, Cypress and Dixiebell): (1) the weight average molecular weights, M w, (from SEC-MALLS) for the amyloses were similar (4.9, 4.8, 5.1 × 10su5 g/mol); (2) the sedimentation coefficients, s 20w ° (from apparent distribution of sedimentation coefficient analysis) were also similar (5.7, 5.3, 7.1 S), despite the fact that the amylose content (relative to amylopectin) for the three rice starches was quite different. The study also shows that attempts to obtain molecular weight by sedimentation velocity (s-D and s- k s on the unseparated materials are not useful: SEC-MALLs is the method of choice for these substances. For heterogeneous materials where preparative separation is not possible, the utility of using SEC-MALLs to characterize component molecular weights and velocity sedimentation to characterize sedimentation coefficients is thus indicated.

Key words

Rice amylose Sedimentation velocity Size exclusion chromatography-multiangle laser light scattering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fronimos P (1990) MPhil Dissertation. University of Leicester, UK; see also Aberle T, Berchard W, Vorwerg W, Radota S (1994) Starch/Starke 46:329Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hizukuri S, Takeda Y, Abe J, Hanashio I, Matsunobu G (1997) In: Frazier PJ, Richmond P, Donald AM (eds) Starch structure and functionality. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 121–128Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banks W, Greenwood CT (1975) Starch and its components. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeda Y, Hizukuri S, Juliano BO (1986) Carbohydr Res 48:299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert ML, Gilbert AG, Spragg PS (1964) In: Whistler LR (ed) Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, vol 4. Academic Press, New York, pp 25–27Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jane JL, Chen JF (1992) Cereal Chem 69:60Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Metheson KN, Welsh AL (1988) Carbohydr Res 180:301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kringler WR, Zimbalski M (1992) Starch/Starke 44:414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ong MH, Jumel K, Tokarczuk FP, Blanshard MVJ, Harding SE (1994) Carbohydr Res 260:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandez A (1996) PhD Thesis. University of Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wyatt PJ (1992) In: Harding SE, Sattelle DB, Bloomfield VA (eds) Laser light scattering in biochemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 35–58Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Juliano BO (1984) In: Whistler RL, Bemiller JN, Paschall EF (eds) Starch chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 507–525Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO (1987) Rice—determination of amylose content. ISO 6647 (E) International Organization for Standardization, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furst A (1997) Eur Biophys J 35:307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stafford W (1992) Anal Biochem 203:295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beckman Instruments (1997) The instruction manual of the Optima XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge with integrated optical systems. The Spinco Business of Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CalifGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanford C (1961) Physical chemistry of macromolecules. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fujii M, Honda K, Fujita H (1973) Biopolymers 12:1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gralen N (1944) PhD Dissertation. University of Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramesh M, Ali SZ, Bhattacharya KR (1999) Carbohydr Polym 38:337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banks W, Greenwood CT, Sloss J (1969) Carbohydr Res 11:399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimm BH (1948) J Chem Phys 16:1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Juliano OB (1985) In: Juliano OB (ed) Rice: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, Minn pp 59–175Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Philo J (1994) In: Schuster TM, Laue TM (eds) Modern analytical ultracentrifugation. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 156–170Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rowe AJ (1977) Biopolymers 16:2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harding SE (1995) Biophys Chem 55:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harding SE, Rowe AJ, Creeth JM (1983) Biochem J 209:893–896Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harding SE, Day K, Dhami R, Lowe PM (1997) Carbohydr Polym 32:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harding SE, Horton JC, Colfen H (1997) Eur Biophys J 25:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harding SE (1997) Prog Biophys Mol Biol 68:207–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Tongdang
    • 1
  • H. F. J. Bligh
    • 2
  • K. Jumel
    • 1
  • S. E. Harding
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological ScienceNCMH Unit, University of NottinghamSutton BoningtonUK
  2. 2.Division of Plant ScienceUniversity of Nottingham School of Biological ScienceNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations