Signed Genome Rearrangement by Reversals and Transpositions: Models and Approximations

  • Guo-Hui Lin
  • Guoliang Xue
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1627)


An important problem in computational molecular biology is the genome rearrangement using reversals and transpositions. Analysis of genome evolving by inversions and transpositions leads to a combinatorial optimization problem of sorting by reversals and transpositions, i.e., sorting of a permutation using reversals and transpositions of arbitrary fragments. The reversal operation works on a single segment of the genome by reversing the selected segment. Two kinds of transpositions have been studied in the literature. The first kind of transposition operation deletes a segment of the genome and insert it into another position in the genome. The second kind of transposition operation deletes a segment of the genome and insert its inverse into another position in the genome. Both transposition operations can be viewed as operations working on two consecutive segments. A third transposition operation working on two consecutive segments is introduced which, together with reversal and the first two kinds of transposition operations, forms the complete set of operations on two consecutive segments. In this paper, we study the sorting of a signed permutation by reversals and transpositions. By allowing only the first kind of transpositions, or the first two kinds of transpositions, or all three kinds of transpositions, we have three problem models. After establishing a common lower bound on the numbers of operations needed, we present a unified 2-approximation algorithm for all these problems. Finally, we present a better 1.75-approximation for the third problem.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. Bafna and P.A. Pevzner, Sorting by reversals: genome rearrangements in plant organelles and evolutionary history of X chromosome, Molecular Biology Evolution, 12(1995), 239–246.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Bafna and P.A. Pevzner, Genome rearrangements and sorting by reversals, SIAM Journal on Computing, 25(2)(1996), 272–289.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Bafna and P.A. Pevzner, Sorting by transpositions, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 11(2)(1998), 224–240.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Caprara, Sorting by reversals is difficult, in Proceedings of the First Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, 1997, 75–83.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q.-P. Gu, S. Peng and H. Sudborough, A 2-approximation algorithm for genome rearrangements by reversals and transpositions, Theoretical Computer Science, 210(1999), 327–339.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Hannenhalli and P. Pevzner, Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals, to appear in Journal of the ACM. A preliminary version appeared in the Proceedings of 27th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kececioglu and D. Sankoff, Exact and approximation algorithms for the inversion distance between two permutations, in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, LNCS 684, 1993, 87–105. Extended version appeared in Algorithmica, 13(1995), 180—210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guo-Hui Lin
    • 1
  • Guoliang Xue
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations