A PSpace Algorithm for Graded Modal Logic

  • Stephan Tobies
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1632)

Abstract

We present a PSpace algorithm that decides satisfiability of the graded modal logic Gr(KR)—a natural extension of propositional modal logic KR by counting expressions—which plays an important role in the area of knowledge representation. The algorithm employs a tableaux approach and is the first known algorithm which meets the lower bound for the complexity of the problem. Thus, we exactly fix the complexity of the problem and refute a ExpTime-hardness conjecture. This establishes a kind of “theoretical benchmark” that all algorithmic approaches can be measured with.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AvBN98.
    Y. André, J. van Benthem, and I. Németi. Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 27(3):217–274, 1998.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. BBH96.
    F. Baader, M. Buchheit, and B. Hollunder. Cardinality restrictions on concepts. Artificial Intelligence, 88(1-2):195–213, 1996.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CLN94.
    D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. A Unified Framework for Class Based Representation Formalisms. Proc. of KR-94, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. dHR95.
    W. Van der Hoek, and M. De Rijke. Counting objects. Journal of Logic and Computation, 5(3):325–345, June 1995.Google Scholar
  5. DLNN97.
    F. M. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and W. Nutt. The complexity of concept languages.. Information and Computation, 134(1):1–58, 10 April 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Fin72.
    K. Fine. In so many possible worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 13:516–520, 1972.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. GS96.
    F. Giunchiglia and R. Sebastiani. Building decision procedures for modallogics from propositional decision procedures—the case study of modal K.. Proc. of CADE-13, LNCS 1104. Springer, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. HB91.
    B. Hollunder and F. Baader. Qualifying number restrictions in concept languages. In Proc. of KR-91, pages 335–346, Boston (USA) 1991.Google Scholar
  9. HM92.
    J. Y. Halpern and Y. Moses. A guide to completeness and complexity for model logics of knowledge and belief. Artificial Intelligence 54(3):319–379, April 1992.Google Scholar
  10. HS97.
    U. Hustadt and R. A. Schmidt. On evaluating decision procedures for modal logic. In Proc. of IJCAI-97, volume 1, pages 202–207, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Lad77.
    R. E. Ladner. The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM Journal on Computing,, 6(3):467–480, September 1977.Google Scholar
  12. OS97.
    H. J. Ohlbach and R. A. Schmidt. Functional translation and second-order frame properties of modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 7(5):581–603, October 1997.Google Scholar
  13. OSH96.
    H. J. Ohlbach, R. A. Schmidt, and U. Hustadt. Translating graded modalities into predicate logic.. In H. Wansing, editor, Proof Theory of Modal Logic volume 2 of Applied Logic Series, pages 253–291. Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Sav70.
    W. J. Savitch. Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 4(2):177–192, April 1970.Google Scholar
  15. Sch91.
    K. Schild. A correspondence theory for terminological logics: Preliminary report. In Proc. of IJCAI-91,, pages 466–471, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. Sch97.
    R. A. Schmidt. Resolution is a decision procedure for many propositional modal logics: Extended abstract. In M. Kracht, M. de Rijke, H. Wansing, and M. Zakharyaschev, editors, Advances in Modal Logic ’96. CLSI Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. SSS91.
    M. Schmidt-Schauß and G. Smolka. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 48:1–26, 1991.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Tobies
    • 1
  1. 1.LuFg Theoretical Computer ScienceRWTH AachenGermany

Personalised recommendations