Extending Social Reasoning to Cope with Multiple Partner Coalitions

  • Nuno David
  • Jaime Simão Sichman
  • Helder Coelho
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1647)

Abstract

We present a utility-driven rationality and a complementary-driven rationality based model, relative to multiple partner coalitions, motivated by relations of dependence and instrumental goal adoption. For this purpose, we analyze social dependency patterns and its corresponding dependency networks. The networks are used as a source of quantitative and qualitative information with which an agent is able to choose the best set of partners and adequate proposals to form coalitions. An e-commerce example is presented, showing the usefulness of the mechanism in real world multi-agent systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cristiano Castelfranchi, Maria Miceli, Amedeo Cesta, Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In Proceedings of MAAMAW’92, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, pages 215–227, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cristiano Castelfranchi, Social power: a point missed in multi-agent, DAI and HCI. In Proceedings of MAAMAW’90, pages 49–62, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steven Ketchpel, Forming coalitions in the face of uncertain rewards. In proceedings of AAAI, pages 414–419, Seattle, WA, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy Lewicki, Joseph Litterer, Negotiation. Irwin, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaime Sichman and Yves Demazeau, Exploiting social reasoning to enhance adaptation in open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of SBIA’95, LNAI 991, J. Wainer and A. Carvalho editors, pages 253–263, LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaime Sichman, Rosaria Conte, Yves Demazeau and Cristiano Castelfranchi, A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Proceedings of ECAI’94, pages 188–192, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reid Smith, The contract net protocol: High-level communications and control is a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on computers, vol.29(12), pages 1104–1113, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park Sunju, Edmund Durfee and William Birmingham, Advantages of strategic thinking in multiagent contracts (a mechanism and analysis). In Proceedings of ICMAS’96, MIT Press, pages 259–266, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Zlotkin and J. Rosenchein, Coalition, cryptograpphy and stability: Mechanisms for coalition formation in task oriented domains. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 432–437, Seattle, WA, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuno David
    • 1
  • Jaime Simão Sichman
    • 2
  • Helder Coelho
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information and Technology SciencesISCTE/DCTILisbonPortugal
  2. 2.LTI/PCS/EP/USPUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.DI/FC/ULUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations